Res-Care Group Home

Pros

• It is a much-needed service.
• The reviewer loved their clients at ResCare.
• The clients deserve more, as well as the employees.

Cons

• The reviewer complains that ResCare will not answer the phone when they are out of state.
• The reviewer questions why drug-involved individuals are allowed into a group home with disabled clients and argues there should be adult supervision, alleging staff may be biased due to benefits.
• The reviewer states that a ResCare staff member hit them in their area.
• The reviewer labels ResCare a bad place to live.
• The reviewer says they have seen how ResCare treats staff and consumers, notes low pay, and asserts the company does not care about keeping staff or clients happy.
• The reviewer explains they loved their clients but did not love ResCare because there is too much work for too little pay, and that clients and employees deserve more.
• The reviewer alleges ResCare workers in their area are disrespectful, play loud music, have visitors while working, ignore quiet hours, and would not be trusted to care for a loved one.

Review

Across the scattered comments about ResCare and related services, a troubling pattern emerges: people see the concept of group homes and in-home care as essential and even life-changing, but the lived reality too often feels unsafe, mismanaged, or undervalued. Several voices say they loved the clients and the idea of the work, yet they are decisively unhappy with the company behind the service. The tension between the noble aims of caregiving and the harsh realities of compensation, supervision, and conduct creates a chorus of warnings and grievances.

One strong thread comes from someone who used to live in a ResCare setting years ago. The reviewer describes a direct, painful experience: a staff member assaulted them in a personal area, an incident that shines a light on perceived safety failures. Beyond that personal harm, there is a broader accusation that the environment allows people who are involved with drugs to work in a group home, placing disabled residents at risk. The reviewer questions how a problem individual who provokes conflicts with a client is treated - are they judged as dangerous, or do systemic factors and misunderstandings overshadow the needs and safety of the client? There is a plea for better adult supervision and a sense that staff may be taking sides, perhaps due to incentives or benefits that bias their actions. In short, this voice frames the situation as not just a personnel issue but a governance and safety concern for vulnerable residents.

Another set of remarks centers around the lived experience of working at ResCare. The sentiment is blunt: it's a bad place to live for residents and a tough place to work for staff. The reviewer emphasizes that there is a lot of work but not enough pay, and they argue that the strains on staff translate into a neglect of both staff welfare and client care. The implication is that the company's compensation and management practices undermine morale and possibly the quality of care. There is a sense that the workers are stretched thin, and that dissatisfaction among staff bleeds into how residents are treated, creating a cycle of discontent that is difficult to break.

A separate voice foregrounds a duality: genuine affection for the clients but a clear rejection of ResCare as an employer. The comment underscores that the clients deserve better than what is offered and hints at ongoing frustration that the company's practices - perhaps in hiring, supervision, and compensation - do not align with the needs of those in the homes or the staff who care for them. The remark "Maybe this is how Apex came along" implies a belief that corporate changes or consolidations may have followed in an attempt to address or mask these longstanding issues, though the reviewer remains skeptical about the outcome.

Several entries pivot to concerns about behavior outside the care setting, highlighting issues with how staff conduct themselves in public spaces tied to the residences. One anonymous but resolute note captures the frustration of neighbors who feel disrespected by staff who play loud music in cars, invite friends and families to visit on the clock, and seemingly prioritize socializing over resident needs. The reviewer points to the conflict of rules - quiet hours and community standards - being ignored by staff who appear to be more engaged in their own group dynamics than in safeguarding the residents they are supposed to protect. The implication is that if these practices are tolerated publicly, what does that say about the care happening inside the residences? The fear is that a lack of accountability at the staff level translates into subpar or inconsistent care for residents who rely on these workers.

Taken together, these reviews sketch a broader critique: while there is an undeniable need for services that support people with disabilities, the execution matters as much as the intention. The commenters consistently argue that clients deserve more robust supervision, safer environments, and clearer accountability for staff conduct. They call for better pay and working conditions to attract and retain qualified workers, as well as stronger safeguards against staff misbehavior. The recurring worry is that without systemic improvements - better training, more consistent supervision, and stricter enforcement of rules - residents will bear the brunt of frustration, safety gaps, and inconsistent care.

On the level of tone and takeaway, the voices are a mix of candid pain and hard-won advocacy. Several contributors express love for the clients themselves and for the essential mission of care, tempered by a deep disappointment in the company's practices, management priorities, and the consequences those priorities have for everyday life in the homes. A common thread is the appeal for adult supervision that is fair, impartial, and focused on resident safety rather than on internal politics, pay scales, or perceived benefits for staff. These impressions combine into a compelling, if troubling, portrait of an industry that can do important, meaningful work but is struggling under the weight of inconsistent standards and insufficient support for the people who live in these facilities and the workers who dedicate themselves to their care.

This part of Evansville, Indiana, offers a convenient and bustling environment for senior living. With a variety of dining options nearby including fast food chains like Taco Bell and McDonald's, as well as sit-down restaurants like Hacienda Mexican Restaurant and Hardee's, seniors will have plenty of choices for meals. There are also places of worship such as Gethsemane Church and Lutheran Church of Our Redeemer within close proximity for spiritual needs. Additionally, there are several healthcare facilities in the area including Indiana MRI Evansville and Deaconess Hospital, ensuring easy access to medical care. Pharmacies like CVS and Walgreens are also nearby for medication needs. For those looking to socialize or enjoy some entertainment, there is Someplace Else Night Club and Corner Pocket just a short distance away. Overall, this neighborhood provides convenience and accessibility to essential services for seniors looking to settle in the Evansville area.

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (0.5 miles)
• McDonald's (1.4 miles)
• Someplace Else Night Club (1.5 miles)
• Hardee's (1.6 miles)
• Hacienda Mexican Restaurants (1.6 miles)
• Corner Pocket (1.8 miles)
• Subway (1.8 miles)

Places of Worship

• Gethsemane Church (1 miles)
• Lutheran Church of Our Redeemer (1.9 miles)
• St Boniface Catholic Church (2.6 miles)

Physicians

• Indiana Mri Evansville (1.2 miles)
• Terry W Talley (1.3 miles)
• Orthopaedic Associates (1.3 miles)
• Evansville Pulmonary Associates (1.3 miles)
• Evansville Radiology PC (1.3 miles)
• Deaconess Critical Care (1.4 miles)
• Deaconess Clinic (1.4 miles)

Hospitals

• Deaconess Hospital (1.4 miles)
• Deaconess ICU (1.4 miles)
• Evansville State Hospital (2.9 miles)
• St Marys Womens Hospital (3 miles)
• St Mary's Auxiliary and Gift Shoppe (3.1 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.2 miles)
• Target Pharmacy (2.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.5 miles)
• Walgreens (2.8 miles)
• Meijer Pharmacy Drive Thru (2.9 miles)
• Walgreens (2.9 miles)

Cafes

• Donut Bank Bakery and Coffee Shop (1.6 miles)
• Starbucks (2.9 miles)
• Donut Bank Bakery and Coffee Shop (3 miles)
• Starbucks (3.1 miles)
• Parlor Doughnuts (3.2 miles)
• Donut Bank Bakery and Coffee Shop (3.2 miles)