155 East Burks Drive, Bloomington, IN 47401
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Golden Living Center - Bloomington Costs & Pricing
At Golden Living Center in Bloomington, the monthly cost for a semi-private room stands at $6,093, which significantly exceeds both the county average of $3,381 and the state average of $3,739. This disparity underscores the center's position within the local long-term care market, potentially reflecting higher levels of service or specialized care. While the costs are notably higher than those of comparable facilities in Monroe County and across Indiana, prospective residents and their families may find that the premium pricing is justified by enhanced amenities or a superior quality of care that aligns with their specific needs.
| Floor plans | Golden Living Center - Bloomington | Monroe County | Indiana |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $6,093 | $3,381 | $3,739 |
Overall Review of Golden Living Center - Bloomington
Pros
The team has worked together for years and are always available when needed.- Golden Living is a very homey place; it's clean and people are friendly.
- The staff at the Golden Living Center are very kind and caring; they have been wonderful to my grandmother.
- It is refreshing to see consistently that people are well cared for in this facility.
- The staff are very friendly and professional; the facility is clean, and residents are treated with respect and promptly helped with call lights.
- An amazing place with staff who love and care for their residents.
- The staff look out for residents' best interests and treat them with dignity.
Cons
The facility does not take proper care of residents.- The place should be condemned due to roaches and neglect.
- The staff ignore patients' call lights and failed to provide medication.
- A patient was left without sheets and proper bedding, while management remained complacent.
- The building reeked of urine.
- The administrator never answers the phone and is unprofessional.
- The staff are rude and not helpful, with patients screaming for help.
- The facility had gnats, spiders, holes in socks, and a pervasive stench.
- There were signs that medications and nutritional needs were being neglected, resulting in a patient ending up in the emergency room.
Review
This community is best suited for families who want a warm, home-like atmosphere and are prepared to be deeply involved in oversight. Golden Living Center – Bloomington often attracts residents with moderate care needs and families that can actively monitor care planning and daily operations. The setting can work for short-term rehabilitation or assisted living when expectations are realistic about day-to-day variability. However, this is not a guaranteed fit for those requiring consistently reliable healthcare, strict cleanliness, or unwavering administrative responsiveness. Prospective residents should plan to stay engaged and be ready to advocate if problems arise.
On the upside, several reviewers describe a staff that is capable, caring, and approachable when operations run smoothly. Long-tenured teams that know residents well contribute to a sense of stability, and families note moments when caregivers treat residents with dignity and respect. The facility’s cleanliness is praised in some accounts, with residents able to participate in activities and enjoy interactions with staff. When call lights are answered promptly and routine care is managed attentively, the experience can be positive, reinforcing a sense of daily normalcy and personal attention that matters to families seeking a humane, personable environment.
Yet the drawbacks are substantive and cannot be dismissed. Multiple accounts portray unsanitary conditions and pervasive odors, with pests reportedly present in parts of the building. There are repeated stories of call lights being ignored, beds unmade, and medications not being administered, serious safety concerns that strike at the core of resident wellbeing. Problems with laundry, nutrition handling, and even transportation suggest systemic operational gaps. Administrative responsiveness is repeatedly questioned, with administrators said to be difficult to reach or slow to return calls. Taken together, these issues create real risk for residents who depend on reliable oversight and timely interventions.
Because the positives center on staff warmth and a generally clean environment, they help offset some frustrations, yet not enough to counter the fundamental clinical and safety gaps. For residents who need consistent medication management, immediate response to call bells, or reliable housekeeping, the downsides substantially weaken the care proposition. The presence of third-party arrangements, like VA contracts mentioned in one review, can complicate accountability when problems arise. Leadership accessibility, or the lack of it, appears to drive much of the variability in care. When management is visible and proactive, families report respectful treatment and quicker problem resolution; when it is not, the risk to vulnerable residents increases significantly.
For families weighing options, a disciplined due-diligence plan is essential. Schedule an on-site tour, speak with residents and multiple staff about medication processes, call-light tracking, and housekeeping routines, and demand a concrete point of contact for issues. Request a detailed daily care plan and insist on a realistic schedule for meals, activities, and mobility assistance. Observe the facility for odors, pests, and overall cleanliness, and verify that administrative leadership is reachable and willing to engage. Consider designating a family liaison to review daily notes and intervene quickly if concerns arise. If these controls cannot be established, it is prudent to consider facilities with a stronger, more consistent track record in safety and reliability.
In sum, Golden Living Center – Bloomington offers a mixed value proposition. It can deliver a warm, engaging atmosphere and a cadre of caring staff within a reasonably clean setting, but persistent safety concerns, inconsistent care delivery, and limited administrative call-through undermine its reliability. Families prioritizing strong clinical oversight, impeccable housekeeping, and rapid administrative accountability should look elsewhere. For those who can commit to vigilant oversight and advocate for steady improvement, and who value a home-like culture despite episodic service gaps, the facility may meet needs, at least for shorter stays or for residents who require moderate assistance. The decision should hinge on willingness to maintain strict oversight and to switch when red flags persist, rather than accepting a facility whose quality fluctuates with management and staffing realities.
153 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Memory Care
Skilled Nursing Facility
Activities off-site
Air-conditioning
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Devotional services on-site
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
24-hour call system
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes
Safeguarding Your Memory Through the Golden Years: Eight Ways to Preserve Cognitive Health
Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment