2130 Harrison Street, Quincy, IL 62301
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Good Samaritan Home Of Quincy
Pros
The staff seems to be very helpful and encourages independence to get residents back home as soon as possible.- The nursing home is very clean and well-organised.
- The facility provides great service.
Cons
The staff do not care about the residents.- The staff are rude.
- They adjust staff hours even when workers stay late to help.
- They charge staff to eat there and have raised prices for meals with family members.
- Every shift fails to take care of residents' families.
- They drive away the aides who go the extra mile for residents.
- The DON slacks at her job and only cares about RCCs.
- They stole a grandmother's money and did nothing despite multiple reports.
- The care there was awful.
- The reviewer finds the care very unsatisfying.
Review
Good Samaritan Home of Quincy is best suited for seniors who prioritize a clean, orderly setting and a rehab-minded approach that aims to get residents back home as soon as possible. This community can work for families that are ready to be actively involved in care planning, monitor routines across shifts, and scrutinize finances closely. It is less ideal for those requiring consistently high-touch, compassionate care around the clock, or for families seeking a facility with airtight safeguards against financial mismanagement and a consistently stable staff culture.
On the positive side, observers repeatedly note a very clean, well-organized environment. The facility’s apparent emphasis on order, safety, and practical day-to-day operations gives families a baseline of reliability in terms of cleanliness and structure. Reports also describe staff as helpful and focused on independence, with an eye toward discharge or return to home when appropriate. When care aligns with a resident’s goals and a family’s oversight, these elements can translate into meaningful progress and a smoother transition back to a familiar routine.
The strongest warnings come from persistent concerns about care consistency and staff demeanor. Several reviews allege that some employees do not care about residents, are rude, or fail to provide adequate attention across every shift. Add to that the disturbing claims of financial abuse and the perception that management priorities may sideline frontline caregivers, and the risk profile shifts markedly. These elements undermine trust and paint a picture of a facility where good days may occur, but bad days, driven by staffing gaps or leadership decisions, can jeopardize safety and comfort.
In weighing pros and cons, the clean, organized setting and the emphasis on independence are meaningful when matched with vigilant oversight. If a resident’s goals include maintaining autonomy and progressing toward a home-based routine, and if a family can consistently monitor care plans, staffing responsiveness, and financial transactions, the positives can partially offset the institutional risks. However, the potential for inconsistent care, negative staff interactions, and allegations of financial mishandling cannot be dismissed. Those factors can erode the very independence this community aims to foster.
Practical due diligence is nonnegotiable. Prospective families should arrange multiple visits at different times, speak with various shifts of direct care staff, and request a transparent tour of dining, activity, and medical support areas. Ask for current resident-care plans, response times, and exact oversight procedures for personal funds and resident accounts. Clarify policies on staff meals, meal pricing, and how family meals or guest access are handled. Request documented grievance channels and recent staff turnover data, and verify how the DON’s role interfaces with frontline caregivers and RCCs to ensure balanced accountability.
Ultimately, families that can commit to rigorous oversight and want a tidy, organized environment with some encouraging signs from staff may find Good Samaritan Home of Quincy workable for a period of transition or shorter-term care. The decision hinges on appetite for risk: the potential for compassionate moments and orderly operation against the backdrop of staffing variability and serious concerns about trust and financial integrity. If those risks feel too high, or if unwavering, consistently attentive care and ironclad financial protections are nonnegotiable, exploring stronger-aligned alternatives is a prudent path.
26 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)
Independent Living
Memory Care
Respite Care
Skilled Nursing Facility
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
