1545 Kelleys Close, Stone Mountain, GA 30088
For more information about senior living options: (844) 490-3973
What level of care are you interested in?

Assisted Living

Memory Care

Independent Living

Skilled Nursing Facility

Continuing Care Retirement Community (CCRC)CCRC

Other
Two accounts converge on a troubling portrait of a home care agency where pay disputes, murky communications, and a pattern of disfavor toward staff seem to be the norm. The first writer describes a squad of red flags from the moment they stepped into a client's home: a home manager who is described as the most unprofessional person they've encountered, so rude that the employee can barely get a word in after introducing themselves. The initial impression is punctuated by a long wait - an hour - before any acknowledgment or conversation occurs. The manager's demeanor is paired with a dismissive phone conversation, leaving the staff and the employee with the sense that questions or concerns are unwelcome. The overall sense is that communication between management and staff is inaccurate and lacking, and that the on-site dynamics are inconsistent and confusing.
Compounding the frustration is the sense of unequal treatment and a culture of accessibility that feels asymmetrical. The in-office manager, the reviewer notes, does not want to be contacted outside of business hours, yet paradoxically, it seems acceptable for him to reach out to employees whenever he chooses. This double standard contributes to a perception of unfairness, especially when shifts are filled at short notice and then interpreted in ways that feel misconstrued or punitive. The writer conveys a sense of being misled or undervalued, and they even signal that they might involve an attorney because the operating mechanics of the agency feel unjust and opaque. The sense of "something fishy" pervades, as if the organization relies on unclear processes and mixed messages to manage its workforce.
In a call for credibility and accountability, the writer urges others to take notes, document interactions, and even take photos if necessary. They claim to have firsthand evidence that staff on hand misses pill passes and covers it up, a serious concern in a home care setting. The insistence on proof underscores a broader theme: employees feel compelled to protect themselves in a system they view as prone to mismanagement and concealment. The tone is accusatory and defensive at once, reflecting a workplace where ordinary duties - like reporting a concern or seeking clarification - are shadowed by fear of retaliation or dismissal, rather than supported by transparent, constructive feedback.
A second experience adds another layer to the portrait: a firm critique of management quality, pay, and the overall value proposition of the job. Here, the pay is labeled as bad for what is expected, and promise or disclosure of details is described as minimal or misleading. The reviewer asserts that recruiters tell you what you want to hear simply to get someone to start, with the implication that people often quit within the first week after discovering the reality of the operation. The environment is depicted as outdated in every sense - physical surroundings, processes, and perhaps even attitudes toward employees. Bed bugs are mentioned as part of the concerns about the home environment, reinforcing a broader narrative of neglect in basic standards of care and safety.
The second account emphasizes a willingness to speak frankly about the risks of staying with the agency. The reviewer warns that the organization will dispose of you as if you had never worked there or never filled out any forms, a claim that hints at a precarious sense of job security and a lack of formal, supportive HR or payroll processes. The advice offered is to back up all documents - contracts, pay records, and other relevant paperwork - and to take pictures if necessary. The message is clear: protect yourself from a system that appears to operate with little consistency, where quitting could trigger delays or disputes over final pay. The broader condemnation centers on a combination of bad business practices and a lack of basic professional etiquette, with a lingering concern about how the organization treats both workers and the integrity of its operations.
Across these two sets of experiences, several threads emerge as common and alarming. There is a persistent complaint about communication breakdowns, with messages from management and staff frequently described as inaccurate or inconsistent. Pay issues loom large, framed as withheld or delayed payouts that accompany a sense of being undervalued or dismissed, sometimes at moments when workers need those wages most. The portrayal of management is consistently negative: unprofessional conduct, a reluctance to be accessible after hours, and a culture that seems to protect itself over supporting employees or clients. The physical and procedural environment is described as outdated and precarious, with safety concerns such as bed bugs surfacing as indicators of broader neglect. The result is a workforce that feels unsupported, anxious about job security, and ready to document every detail in anticipation of disputes or formal action.
What emerges from these reviews is a portrait of a care agency that appears to operate with minimal regard for clear, respectful communication, reliable payroll, or consistent management practices. The repeated warnings to preserve contracts, record interactions, and capture any irregularities reflect a climate where workers feel they must shield themselves from retaliation or mishandling. For anyone considering engagement with this agency, these narratives suggest serious caution: verify every term of employment in writing, confirm how and when you will be paid, and insist on transparent communication channels with both management and payroll. The stories collectively depict a workplace where uncertainty, delayed compensation, and questionable practices coalesce into a troubling environment that affects both staff morale and the quality of care provided to clients.
Heartease is a vibrant assisted living community located in Stone Mountain, GA. Our community offers a wide range of amenities and care services to ensure the comfort and well-being of our residents.
Upon entering our community, you will be greeted by a warm and inviting dining room where residents can enjoy delicious meals prepared by our talented culinary team. Each living space is fully furnished, providing a comfortable and homely atmosphere for our residents.
Our beautiful garden and outdoor spaces offer a tranquil setting for relaxation and socialization. Residents can take part in various outdoor activities or simply unwind amidst nature's beauty.
To ensure a hassle-free move, we offer move-in coordination services, assisting residents with every step of the process. Our dedicated housekeeping team ensures that each resident's living space remains tidy and clean at all times.
We understand the importance of staying connected in today's digital age, which is why we provide telephone and Wi-Fi/high-speed internet access to all residents.
At Heartease, we prioritize the well-being of our residents by offering assistance with daily activities such as bathing, dressing, and transfers. Our caring staff members coordinate with healthcare providers to ensure that each resident receives the necessary support for their individual needs. We also provide diabetes diet management, medication management, and special dietary restrictions to promote optimal health outcomes.
Transportation arrangements are available for medical appointments, ensuring that residents have easy access to necessary healthcare services. Additionally, transportation to nearby restaurants, parks, places of worship, pharmacies, and physicians' offices allows our residents to remain active within their local community.
Our community fosters an engaging environment with scheduled daily activities designed to enhance physical fitness, mental stimulation, and social interaction among residents.
Located near four parks, eight pharmacies, four physicians' offices, 20 restaurants, one hospital,and nine places of worship; Heartease ensures that residents have convenient access to essential amenities within close proximity.
At Heartease in Stone Mountain,Ga, our goal is to provide a supportive community where residents can live comfortably, enjoy an active lifestyle, and receive the care they need. We invite you to experience the warmth and hospitality of Heartease.
Heartease - Community Living Arrangement is located at 1545 Kelleys Close, Stone Mountain, GA 30088 in DeKalb County, Georgia
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Assisted living for adults with disabilities has transformed to provide personalized care and support services aimed at improving residents' quality of life while balancing independence and assistance. However, low-income individuals often face challenges in affording these services, requiring navigation of various financial resources and advocacy for better policies and solutions.
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted living facilities provide support for older adults needing help with daily activities without extensive medical care, but their costs can be high and vary by location and services offered. Families often seek various funding options and financial strategies to manage these expenses effectively while considering future needs and potential price increases.
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
The article discusses assisted living expenses, the importance of long-term care insurance in covering these costs, and various financing options, highlighting the need for careful policy review and early planning to address potential needs. It also clarifies common misconceptions about Medicare and private health insurance limitations regarding long-term care coverage.