2701 W State Street, Tampa, FL 33609
To contact a resident: (813) 447-3819
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Arthur Home Assisted Living Facility Costs & Pricing
Arthur Home Assisted Living Facility offers competitive pricing for its services when compared to the broader market in both Hillsborough County and the state of Florida. For semi-private rooms, residents will find that Arthur Home's rate of $3,000 per month is slightly below the county average of $3,096 and notably lower than the state average of $3,009. Similarly, the facility's private room rate stands at $3,500, which is more economical than the county's average of $3,384 and significantly less than the state-wide figure of $3,699. This pricing strategy makes Arthur Home an appealing option for families seeking quality assisted living care without incurring excessive costs.
| Floor plans | Arthur Home Assisted Living Facility | Hillsborough County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $3,096 | $3,009 |
| Private | $3,500 | $3,384 | $3,699 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$500 / mo
Garden Oasis Alf
$2,500 to $3,500 / month12.2 miles away -
About the same
Mary's Assisted Living Facility House
$3,000 / month8.3 miles away -
from -$300 / mo
Alafia Village
$2,700 to $4,000 / month12.6 miles away -
from -$500 / mo
Mi Bello Hogar Living Facility
$2,500 / month2.9 miles away -
from +$435 / mo
A Care Connection - Tampa, FL
$3,435 to $3,450 / month1.7 miles away
Overall Review of Arthur Home Assisted Living Facility
Pros
The facility has an excellent team that provides excellent care to residents.- The notes are in excellent condition.
- The administration is 100% attentive.
- The relationship between residents and workers is exceptional.
- Hyde Park Alf is highly recommended, with caring and responsive staff, a clean environment, and happy residents.
- The staff are helpful, the facility is consistently clean and smells nice, and the food looks great.
- Arthur Home is very clean; the staff are awesome and treat residents like family; families are kept informed.
Cons
The female owner doesn't care about much beyond profits.- The food is mostly canned and boxed.
- Rats and cockroaches are in the walls and rooms everywhere.
- The facility has a constant skeleton crew and horrible housekeeping.
- The staff refuse to let residents control their own medicine.
- They pass out narcotics to patients like candy.
Review
Arthur Home Assisted Living Facility in Tampa is best suited for families seeking a small, home-like setting where administration is highly involved and direct relationships with staff can be cultivated. Several reviews point to an attentive, capable administrative team, strong notes documentation, and a staff culture that builds ties with residents. When things go well, residents feel cared for, with caregivers who know them, visits that feel personal, and ongoing family updates. This makes it a reasonable choice for families who value visibility, daily communication, and a sense that the home is personally managed rather than purely institutional.
Yet this community is not for everyone. Those prioritizing consistently spotless environments, rigorous cleanliness standards, and flawless operational reliability should consider alternatives. Several reviews raise serious red flags about maintenance and hygiene, describing infestations, dirty spaces, and overall conditions that do not meet basic expectations. For families with loved ones who require strict adherence to dietary restrictions, precise medication management, or comprehensive daily assistance, the inconsistencies highlighted by multiple residents suggest risk that could outweigh the positives. In short, if cleanliness, predictable staffing, and robust day-to-day support are non-negotiable, alternatives deserve careful consideration.
The strongest arguments in favor of Arthur Home rest on the personal touch and the responsiveness of a hands-on administration. When staffing holds steady, residents benefit from attentive caregivers, clear communication with families, and a culture that feels more like a close-knit household than a cold facility. Positive notes about the care team, the quality of resident–staff interactions, and the pride some workers take in their roles cannot be dismissed. For families who can participate actively, visiting often, asking questions, and monitoring daily rhythms, the potential for a warm, well-coordinated routine is real and meaningful.
However, the main cons are not minor. Repeated reports describe skeleton crews, limited assistance beyond emergencies, and a lack of accommodations for dietary needs or allergy restrictions. Housekeeping quality is a recurring complaint, alongside assertions that ownership expectations may skew toward profit rather than resident welfare. Medication control is another sore point, with claims that families lose some control over their loved one’s regimen. Such issues, if they recur, can erode trust quickly, making the care feel inconsistent and reactive rather than proactive.
These pros and cons don’t cancel each other out; they offset in ways that hinge on individual circumstances. For a family that can maintain an active presence, insist on stringent daily oversight, and demand rapid responsiveness, Arthur Home’s strengths become a considerable asset. The intimate scale can translate into meaningful, daily recognition of a resident’s needs, and the administrative commitment can support timely updates and problem-solving. But for households facing high medical complexity, strict dietary restrictions, or an expectation of uniformly flawless upkeep, the gaps cited in several reviews may loom too large.
In the final assessment, Arthur Home is a practical fit for families valuing a small, operator-involved setting where staff relationships matter and where family engagement can drive a steady, attentive routine. It works best when cleanliness and consistent, wide-ranging support are achievable through vigilant oversight and ongoing dialogue with the team. For those who prioritize immaculate facilities, predictable daily care, or advanced medical and dietary support, alternatives, such as other Tampa ALFs highlighted by reviewers for stronger cleanliness and more dependable operations, should be explored before making a commitment. A candid, on-site visit with a prepared list of questions about staffing, housekeeping, medication control, and dietary accommodations will reveal whether Arthur Home can meet the resident’s essential needs or if another option offers greater peace of mind.
Board and Care Home
Day Program
Bath tubs
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Tampa International (3 miles away)
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Meals provided
BBQs or picnics
Birthday parties
Comprehensive Insights and Practical Strategies to Help Older Adults Avoid Falls
6 Crucial Ways an Elder Law Attorney Assists Families
Navigating the Tax Landscape of Caregiving: Credits, Deductions, and Beyond
