2485 Ridgecrest Ave, Orange Park, FL 32065
To contact a resident: (904) 327-5584
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Acacia Grove Costs & Pricing
At Acacia Grove, the monthly costs for accommodations reflect the quality of care and services offered. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $3,500, which is slightly above the average in Clay County at $3,261 and higher than the state average of $3,009. In contrast, a private room at Acacia Grove is priced at $4,000, again surpassing both local and state averages - Clay County's average is $3,948 while Florida's overall average stands at $3,699. These figures indicate that while Acacia Grove may be positioned as a premium option within the region, it also emphasizes an elevated standard of living and personalized care that many families find essential for their loved ones.
| Floor plans | Acacia Grove | Clay County | Florida |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,261 | $3,009 |
| Private | $4,000 | $3,948 | $3,699 |
Overall Review of Acacia Grove
Pros
The facility is super clean.
It is a small facility with personalized care for residents.
Residents are checked on constantly.
Acacia Grove has the appropriate amount of staff and expertise to meet the needs of bed-bound or wheelchair-bound residents.
The presence of a family member there has been phenomenal.
The reviewer would recommend Acacia Grove to others.
Cons
The staff reportedly violated health regulations and failed to meet the standards for assisted living facilities.
The staff were described as outrageous and verbally abusive toward residents and their visitors.
Review
Acacia Grove in Orange Park, FL is best suited for families seeking intimate, high-touch care in a small, clean setting. It works for residents who require substantial daily attention, particularly bed-bound or wheelchair-dependent individuals, because the staff-to-resident dynamics are tight and personalized care plans can be maintained with visible consistency. The environmentâs cleanliness and manageable size support predictable routines and a steady pace of monitoring, yielding a sense of safety through accessible, familiar staff presence. This is not a large, impersonal campus; it is a home-like option where caregivers can deliver frequent checks and steady supervision.
Those who might want alternatives are families who cannot tolerate concerns around safety and staff conduct. If regulatory compliance and a culture of respectful interaction are non-negotiable, Acacia Grove may not meet expectations. Allegations of health violations and verbal abuse toward residents and visitors raise serious red flags about safety, dignity, and the reliability of care. For families prioritizing formal oversight, transparent inspection records, and a consistently professional environment, larger facilities with clearer processes and stronger external accountability could be a better match.
The strong points, cleanliness, small size, personalized attention, and constant check-ins, do offer meaningful benefits for high-need residents. A tightly staffed, attentive team can manage complex mobility needs and ensure timely assistance, translating into fewer unmet needs and more opportunities for safe, engaging routines within a familiar, supportive setting. These advantages arenât trivial; they create a baseline of daily reliability that a caregiver must have to avoid genuine safety gaps. For residents who value steady human contact and predictable, hands-on care, these factors carry real weight.
Yet the downsides are not minor. If the claims about health violations and abusive behavior hold true, they undermine every positive attribute and create a risk profile that can overwhelm potential gains. Dignity and emotional well-being are jeopardized when residents are subjected to verbal harassment or when regulatory standards appear compromised. In a setting where care needs are high, trust between families, residents, and staff is essential; once that trust frays, continuity of care becomes precarious and residents may endure avoidable distress.
For families considering Acacia Grove, a disciplined due-diligence process is essential. Demand the latest state inspection results and any corrective-action records; meet with the administrator and the direct-care leadership; request to observe a shift to witness actual interactions; verify staffing ratios on different shifts; inquire about training, incident reporting, and the consequences for staff who violate standards. If responses feel defensive or opaque, or if records show repeated compliance issues, those signals strongly favor looking elsewhere and continuing the search for a community with a stronger track record of safe, respectful care.
Bottom line: Acacia Grove can be a strong fit for residents who need constant, personalized attention in a small, clean setting, and for families willing to actively monitor tone, culture, and safety. For others, especially those who demand unwavering regulatory compliance, a consistently respectful environment, and a proven record of abuse-free care, alternative communities with clearer safeguards and broader oversight should be prioritized. The decision hinges on whether intimate, high-contact care in a compact home supersedes the potential risk of regulatory concerns and staff behavior that could erode safety and peace of mind.








In-Home Care Costs in 2025: A Detailed State-by-State Exploration
Understanding Home Health Care: A Comprehensive Guide
Home Health Care Demystified: A Comprehensive Guide for Families and Caregivers