Oakwood Apartments Costs & Pricing
Oakwood Apartments offers a competitive rental rate of $875 per month for a two-bedroom unit, significantly lower than both the Douglas County average of $5,514 and the state of Colorado's average of $4,580. This pricing position provides an attractive option for potential tenants seeking affordability without compromising on quality. The considerable difference in costs highlights Oakwood's commitment to providing accessible housing solutions within the broader market context, making it an appealing choice for individuals and families looking to settle in a desirable location while maintaining budget-friendly living expenses.
| Floor plans | Oakwood Apartments | Douglas County | Colorado |
|---|
| 2 Bedrooms | $875 | $5,514 | $4,580 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Pinewood Lodge
$879 to $1,055 / month
22.6 miles away
-
About the same
Eaton Terrace Residences
$879 to $3,411 / month
24.8 miles away
-
from -$84 / mo
The Village at Hampden Town Center
$791 to $915 / month
18.3 miles away
-
from -$34 / mo
Campbell Stone Memorial Residence
$841 to $1,081 / month
24.9 miles away
-
from -$145 / mo
Southview Place Towers
$730 to $890 / month
17.4 miles away
Overall Review of Oakwood Apartments
caveat
21 reviews mention this
Firearms policy sparks strong backlash
A large share of reviewers criticize the communityâs firearms and weapons rules.
Many of the lowest-rated reviews describe frustration with a perceived ban on firearms or weapons, framing it as a threat to resident safety or personal rights. Some reviewers connect the policy to concerns about being an easier target. The same safety concern theme also appears in discussion of how residents would be left unarmed. Other reviews describe the opposite experience, but the overall tone around weapons is clearly contentious.
common
10 reviews mention this
Staff and management feel responsive
Residents often describe management and office staff as kind and responsive.
Across multiple reviews, residents highlight cheerful, kind, and efficient communication from staff in the office and on-site. Several mention that issues are handled promptly and that problems get taken care of rather than left hanging. A few reviews go the other direction, criticizing how management responds or communicates, which helps explain why opinions vary. Still, positive day-to-day interactions with staff are a recurring thread.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Repairs and safety can slip
Some reviewers report slow maintenance and serious building issues.
While some residents praise how quickly management addresses problems, other reviewers describe maintenance taking days to respond. These concerns include reports of leaks and heat or lighting problems, along with general statements that things are âfalling apart.â Taken together, the reviews suggest maintenance responsiveness is not consistent for everyone. If you prioritize building upkeep and urgent repairs, itâs worth paying close attention to what current residents say.
common
4 reviews mention this
Clean, updated apartments and grounds
Multiple residents describe the property as clean and updated.
Several reviews emphasize cleanliness and updated apartment conditions, including mentions of updated interiors and well-kept grounds. Others describe the overall upkeep as strong for an income-based property, with apartments in good condition. There are also a couple of contrasting reviews that describe deterioration and delayed attention to issues, which may reflect how maintenance varies over time or by resident experience. Overall, cleanliness and condition are common points of positive feedback.
common
2 reviews mention this
Pet-friendly community
Residents say the community is pet-friendly for cats and small dogs.
At least a couple of reviews call out the community as pet-friendly, including explicit mention of animals being welcome. This aligns with the way the community is presented as allowing cats and dogs. While most of the praise is brief, itâs consistent enough to stand out as a practical benefit for pet owners. If youâre considering bringing a pet, these repeated mentions are a useful signal.
common
2 reviews mention this
On-site common areas and activities
The property offers on-site common spaces and resident activities.
One review highlights an on-site outdoor terrace with seating and a view, along with shared spaces for games, puzzles, and quiet time. The community also gets described as having a place for activities and âfun,â though at least one reviewer says management has changed the experience over time. That combination suggests the physical spaces for gatherings exist, but resident experiences with how consistently activities are supported may vary. If you value being able to socialize on-site, itâs worth reading the comments closely for current patterns.
common
3 reviews mention this
Rent pricing is described as affordable
Some residents describe the rent as affordable for their situation.
A few reviews explicitly mention affordability and income-based context, including one resident who says theyâre happy with where they live because itâs affordable. Another review provides a specific monthly rent figure (with additional utilities), reinforcing that cost is a factor in choosing this property. The listing pricing also indicates rent is priced well below broader benchmarks for at least a two-bedroom unit type. Still, there are negative reviews that complain about rules and management behavior, so affordability doesnât remove other concerns.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.