797 Tarpan Place, Castle Rock, CO 80104
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Assured Assisted Living 2 Costs & Pricing
Assured Assisted Living 2 offers a distinctive pricing structure that reflects its premium services in the context of both Douglas County and Colorado as a whole. For those considering semi-private accommodations, the monthly cost is set at $5,900, which notably exceeds the county average of $4,298 and the state average of $4,009. Similarly, private rooms at Assured Assisted Living 2 are priced at $6,900, significantly higher than both the Douglas County rate of $4,485 and the Colorado average of $4,142. These costs suggest that while Assured Assisted Living 2 may be on the higher end of the market spectrum, it likely provides enhanced amenities and personalized care designed to meet the needs of its residents effectively.
| Floor plans | Assured Assisted Living 2 | Douglas County | Colorado |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $5,900 | $4,298 | $4,008 |
| Private | $6,900 | $4,485 | $4,142 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$700 / mo
Serenity House Assisted Living Portland Drive
$5,200 to $6,500 / month17.0 miles away -
from -$700 / mo
Serenity House Assisted Living Hunters Hill
$5,200 to $6,500 / month12.9 miles away -
from -$700 / mo
Serenity House Assisted Living Hinsdale
$5,200 to $6,500 / month13.7 miles away -
from -$450 / mo
MorningStar of Observatory Park
$5,450 to $8,300 / month20.0 miles away -
from -$700 / mo
Serenity House Assisted Living Littleton
$5,200 to $6,400 / month16.7 miles away
Overall Review of Assured Assisted Living 2
Pros
The staff were really good people, diligent with their work and very caring.- They had the resident's best interests in mind, making the family very comfortable with him.
- The staff tailored the care to the resident's specific needs and wants.
- Even the chef would prepare whatever the resident wanted.
- The facility and staff are great and did a good job taking care of the loved one.
- The staff-to-resident ratio was excellent, with men and women working together.
- The community offered a variety of activities, including daily music, memory games, and physical therapy–type exercises to keep residents active.
- All caregivers had been there for a while and worked as a cohesive team.
Cons
It was not a good fit; the care did not meet her needs.- It was dementia-focused care and she did not have dementia, making communication with staff difficult.
- She claimed a staff member pulled her out of bed by her legs and threw her into a wheelchair.
- She waited several hours every morning to be cared for.
- She was awakened every 15 minutes at night due to incontinence concerns.
- The transfer method used by staff was unsafe; they had her clasp her hands around their neck to transfer instead of using proper equipment.
- The food was mostly processed with very little fresh food.
Review
Assured Assisted Living 2 in Castle Rock is best suited for residents who benefit from a smaller, hands-on assisted-living environment with a stable, caregiving-focused staff. The community tends to work well for seniors who need help with daily activities, value structured routines, and respond to memory-support oriented programming delivered by long-tenured caregivers who know residents well. Families should be aware that this setting is less ideal for those who crave expansive outdoor spaces, very high-acuity medical oversight, or a dementia-dedicated environment designed for someone without a dementia diagnosis. For those needs, alternatives with a broader nursing footprint or more outdoor programming may be a better fit.
The strongest asset is the care team itself. Across reviews, the staff emerges as steady, dedicated, and capable of tailoring care to individual preferences, with teams that collaborate and maintain a high degree of consistency. The presence of long-tenured caregivers adds a reassuring continuity, and programming that includes daily activities, music, memory games, and gentle exercises helps residents stay engaged. A favorable staff-to-resident ratio is repeatedly cited, contributing to a sense that caregivers can respond more attentively to daily needs and behavioral cues, which is a meaningful advantage when seeking dependable, day-to-day support.
Yet serious safety concerns shadow one firsthand account. A troubling report described rough handling during transfers and a failure to use proper assistive devices, creating a credible risk warning about oversight and training. Communication challenges can intensify risk for residents who are hard of hearing or speak a language different from staff, especially when paired with long waits for basic care or disruptive nocturnal routines. Food quality was also questioned in that account, and small room sizes plus limited outdoor activity may contribute to restlessness for some residents, particularly those with memory issues who benefit from a broader environment.
These strengths and concerns do not exist in isolation; the positive, stable caregiving framework can offset many routine frustrations if rigorous safeguards are in place. When staff are consistently present and responsive, families gain confidence through clear expectations, open lines of communication, and well-documented care plans. The best avenue to maximize safety and satisfaction is to insist on written protocols for transfers, explicit training standards, and ongoing supervision. The more that families verify these elements, and observe the interaction between staff and residents, the more reliably the pros translate into steady, high-quality daily living.
For families weighing options, it’s prudent to consider alternatives if outdoor access, larger living spaces, or a higher level of skilled medical oversight is paramount. Residents with advanced dementia or complex medical needs requiring frequent skilled intervention may fare better in a setting specializing in memory care or skilled nursing. Language and communication considerations should also guide choices toward communities with multilingual staff or clearer communication supports. If the decision centers on memory-friendly engagement and a stable, caring team, Assured Assisted Living 2 remains a credible contender worth a thorough, written due-diligence process.
Bottom line: Assured Assisted Living 2 offers a solid option for families prioritizing dependable staffing, personalized attention, and structured programming within a contained setting. It warrants serious consideration for residents who will thrive with careful supervision, routine consistency, and memory-support activities. Before committing, demand specifics in writing about transfer protocols and equipment usage, staff training standards, meal programs, and opportunities to observe an activity schedule firsthand. When these safeguards align with the resident’s needs and the family’s risk tolerance, the community can deliver reliable daily living with the right safeguards in place.
9 resident community capacity
1-bedroom apartments
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services on-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Respite or short term stays offered
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Hospice waiver
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
How to Communicate with a Loved One Living with Dementia: 10 Supportive Strategies