1395 North San Antonio Avenue, Upland, CA 91786
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
M.A.M. Family Home II Costs & Pricing
M.A.M. Family Home II offers competitive monthly fees that are thoughtfully positioned within the local and state market. For a semi-private room, the cost is $3,000, which is slightly above the San Bernardino County average of $2,958 but more affordable than the broader California average of $3,333. Private room accommodations are priced at $3,500, closely aligning with the county's average of $3,561 while remaining below the state average of $3,939. Similarly, studio units at M.A.M. Family Home II also reflect this advantageous pricing strategy at $3,500 - slightly under the county's rate of $3,455 and significantly lower than California's statewide average of $4,145. Overall, M.A.M. Family Home II presents a balanced approach to pricing that prioritizes affordability while maintaining quality care in a competitive environment.
| Floor plans | M.A.M. Family Home II | San Bernardino County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $2,958 | $3,333 |
| Private | $3,500 | $3,561 | $3,939 |
| Studio | $3,500 | $3,455 | $4,145 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$500 / mo
Valley Spring Elderly Care
$2,500 to $3,000 / month21.5 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Comfort Keepers Home Care
$3,500 to $6,500 / month18.4 miles away -
About the same
Best Elderly Care I
$3,000 to $3,500 / month23.0 miles away -
from -$200 / mo
Bianca's Home Care
$2,800 to $3,400 / month21.4 miles away -
from +$500 / mo
Sunny Ridge Manor Home
$3,500 to $4,000 / month23.9 miles away
Overall Review of M.A.M. Family Home II
Pros
The staff were very nice and the home was nice.- The tour staff were punctual and answered questions in detail.
- The community had many nice amenities and the home was clean.
- The outside of the home was clean and well maintained.
- The tour guide was good and suitable for their needs.
- The community has been amazing.
- The staff are kind and loving, offer excellent care, great food, and communicate wonderfully with families.
- A caregiver named July is amazing.
- The place is kept very clean and the staff does everything they can to ensure residents eat and take their medications.
- Joy came to their home to discuss offerings and reassure them prior to moving in.
Cons
All patients seem to be very low functioning.- They don’t go on outings regularly or do activities due to the patients can’t get out or just don’t do it.
- The residents, though clean, seemed to be lined up against one wall in front of a TV in the living area.
- The house needs alot of work.
- Only had one shared room.
- They don't seem to have any activities though.
Review
M.A.M. Family Home II in Upland is best suited for families seeking a compact, home-like setting where residents receive steady, compassionate supervision and caregivers treat each person as a family member. The strongest draw is not clinical polish but everyday warmth: a clean, pleasant residence where staff know residents by name, anticipate needs, and foster familiar routines that feel less institutional and more like living with trusted caregivers. For many families nearby, the personal touch and straightforward, predictable environment translate into real peace of mind when a loved one requires hands-on assistance with meals, medications, and daily activities within a relaxed, intimate setting.
This community will appeal most to those who prioritize relational care over programmed activity or campus-style amenities. Those who expect a bustling activity calendar, frequent outings, or a wide array of on-site programs may want alternatives. Several reviews describe a calm, quiet atmosphere with limited ongoing programming and a menu that may not meet every expectation. If a loved one thrives on variety, regular off-site excursions, and a dynamic, ever-changing schedule, this setting may feel too restrained. Families seeking extensive private-room options or a broader range of integrated health services should compare other facilities.
The standout positives are unmistakable: consistently warm, attentive staff; a home that is clean and well maintained; and strong, two-way communication with families. The testimonials repeatedly highlight caregivers who go beyond routine tasks, and a few individuals receive standout recognition for their impact, examples include instances of staff creating memorable moments or the warmth of daily interactions that keep residents engaged. This level of personal connection can offset some limitations in programming by ensuring that the resident’s emotional and nutritional needs are consistently met, which matters deeply for low-functioning seniors who rely on stable routines and trusted caregivers.
Those advantages, however, only partially offset the notable drawbacks. Limited activities and outings can leave residents with fewer opportunities for social engagement, exercise, or stimulating experiences, and several observations point to days that feel anchored by a single TV-viewing routine or predictable patterns rather than varied stimulation. Maintenance concerns and constrained room configurations also surface in reviews, signaling that the physical footprint may not meet every family’s expectations for space, modernity, or adaptability. The blend of high-touch care with a static activity landscape means outcomes hinge on how much value is placed on daily reassurance and personal attention versus structured enrichment.
Practical decision cues help translate these impressions into a clear choice. Room availability appears modest, with at least one report noting a single shared-room option, while another review describes a more open shared-space with outdoor access. Prospective residents should verify current room types, sizes, and any pricing differentials, then demand an up-to-date activity calendar and sample menu to understand real-world offerings. It is essential to observe staffing consistency during multiple visits and to meet several caregivers, not just the lead staff, to gauge how care feels on a typical day. Ask for references from families with residents at similar care levels to ensure expectations align with what the community can reliably deliver.
In the end, M.A.M. Family Home II represents a reliable, heart-centered choice for families who value a genuine, home-like atmosphere and steadfast caregiver devotion. It stands out for clean, comfortable surroundings and a culture of warmth and open communication that can deliver substantial reassurance during transitions. Yet for families requiring a vibrant programming slate, frequent outings, or a broader array of room configurations and modern conveniences, alternatives may better meet those demands. The decision should hinge on three pillars: the resident’s need for predictable, affectionate care; the family’s appetite for structured activities and engagement; and the practicality of securing the right room type with transparent cost terms. When these align, this community can offer a stable, comforting home where meaningful connections outweigh the gaps in programming.
6 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Dogs allowed
Activities on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ontario International (5 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Dementia Behaviors: In-Depth Understanding and Effective Coping Strategies
5 Early Indicators of Dementia and What You Can Do
8 Important Indicators That Memory Care May Be Necessary