9073 Olive Street, Fontana, CA 92335
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Mountain View Residential Care
Cons
The place is dirty and infested with bed bugs, cockroaches, mice, and deadly spiders such as black widows and brown recluses.- They claim to fix the place, but the electrical and plumbing are all bad.
- The place is corrupt and illegal and will be shut down soon.
- The staff don't care and send residents to the hospital on a monthly basis.
- The staff are not licensed caregivers or nurses.
- They serve food with improper handling and engage in under-table dealings.
- The owner hides from responsibilities and ruins her other properties.
- A sewer leaks into the fresh water source, creating a health hazard.
- The premises are neglected, not up to code, with expired licenses, and look like a city dump.
Review
This Mountain View Residential Care in Fontana is best suited for families who have exhausted other options and are prepared to accept serious quality and safety deficiencies as a condition of care. The consensus in the strongest reviews is that the facility struggles with basic cleanliness, pest control, and ongoing maintenance, all of which create an environment where health and daily comfort are compromised. In short, it is not a good fit for anyone who expects reliable care, licensed supervision, and a sanitary living space. If safety and up-to-date operating standards are non-negotiable, this community should be crossed off the short list.
Those considering alternatives should focus on facilities with verifiable licenses, licensed caregivers, clean surroundings, and transparent governance. Families dealing with dementia, mobility challenges, or medical needs will want a setting where trained staff are consistently available, appropriately credentialed, and monitored by state agencies. If a loved one requires regular hospital visits, clear care plans, and predictable routines, the search should pivot toward communities that demonstrate a track record of compliance, proactive maintenance, and accountable administration rather than idealized promises.
The most troubling elements in the feedback are the persistent claims of dirtiness and infestations, combined with reported structural and utility neglect. Bed bugs, cockroaches, mice, and sewer-related issues are described as pervasive, with plumbing and electrical systems allegedly in disrepair and the premises treated as neglected. The implication of unlicensed or inadequately trained staff handling meals and resident care compounds the risk, and the broader picture painted is one of a facility operating with limited oversight. The accusation that operators evade responsibilities and that operating licenses are expired or not properly renewed adds a layer of regulatory concern that cannot be ignored when evaluating safety.
A lone 4-star rating appears to indicate that at least one reviewer found value elsewhere, but without corroborating detail, that rating loses traction against the prevailing negative evidence. The absence of consistent documentation about cleanliness, safety, and professional care means that any potential positives are unproven and insufficient to offset the tangible hazards described. Families should not rely on a single favorable impression when multiple reports emphasize the possibility of harm, frequent hospitalizations among residents, and ongoing maintenance failures. The overall risk profile is outsized relative to any perceived benefits.
For families evaluating options, a disciplined due-diligence plan is essential. Verify the facility’s current license status with the California Department of Social Services and obtain the most recent inspection reports, including any citation histories and corrective action plans. Schedule unscheduled visits to observe housekeeping, pest control activity, and kitchen safety, and interview residents about daily routines, meal quality, and responsiveness of staff. Request a detailed staff roster, including credentials and training records, and review nurse coverage and medical oversight arrangements. Insist on transparent maintenance logs, emergency procedures, and a clear escalation path if concerns arise. If anything smells like a lack of accountability, it should trigger an immediate move-away decision.
In the final calculus, Mountain View Residential Care presents a high-risk proposition. The combination of cleanliness failures, infestation concerns, maintenance neglect, and questions about licensure creates a risk-to-wellbeing that most families should not gamble with. Alternatives that offer verifiable licensing, consistent professional care, and well-maintained environments will deliver far stronger peace of mind for residents and families. If options are truly limited, impose strict, milestone-based conditions and maintain a rapid exit strategy; otherwise, redirect the search toward communities with transparent operations, licensed staff, and proven safety records.
24 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Ontario International (10 miles away)
24-hour call system
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Small, intimate board-and-care with 24-hour supervision, meals, ADL support, and transportation coordination.
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities
Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration