4944 Buffington Road, El Monte, CA 91732
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II Costs & Pricing
St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II offers a range of room options at competitive rates when compared to both Los Angeles County and the broader California state averages. For semi-private accommodations, the cost is set at $3,500 per month, which is slightly higher than the county average of $3,349 and the state average of $3,333. Studio apartments are priced at $4,500, surpassing both local and state figures - $4,172 and $4,145 respectively. Interestingly, for private rooms, St. Judes aligns its pricing with the county's $4,197 but notably exceeds the state's average of $3,939. Overall, while St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II's rates may be above some benchmarks in specific categories, they reflect a commitment to quality care and comfortable living for residents.
| Floor plans | St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,500 | $3,349 | $3,333 |
| Studio | $4,500 | $4,172 | $4,145 |
| Private | $4,500 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II
Pros
The staff provides outstanding and vigilant care for residents.
The facility is friendly, welcoming, and has a warm, family-like atmosphere.
The staff is caring, alert, patient, professional, and personable.
The level of care is very satisfying, with attentive and professional staff.
Lenora Womack's work ethic, passion, and commitment to providing the best senior care are commendable.
The facility is clean, well-maintained, and free of unpleasant odors.
The activities program includes music, walking, and games that support residents’ well-being.
The staff and medical team communicate effectively to address issues necessary for quality care.
The facility comes highly recommended by families.
Residents are treated with care, patience, and kindness, even in challenging moments.
Cons
They would not recommend this facility, noting that their mother was transferred to another facility without consent and that they did not know her whereabouts.
They described the place as a “horror house,” alleging neglect, unsafe conditions, and that most nurse aides are poorly trained or indifferent.
They claimed the staff is understaffed and that many aides are lazy and do not care about residents.
They witnessed a resident fall, blaming insufficient supervision and safety measures.
Review
St. Judes Homes For The Elderly II in El Monte is best suited for families seeking a warm, intimate, staff-led environment where care feels personal and communication with caregivers is consistently solid. The community earns strong marks for a cohesive team, reception, nurses, doctors, and social workers all functioning as one, delivering attentive, respectful care. The Director of Social Services, Lenora Womack, is repeatedly cited as a standout advocate who coordinates services with ethics and genuine commitment. The setting itself reads as a small, family-like facility: clean, calm, and conducive to meaningful interaction, with a sense that staff know residents well and make an effort to involve families in daily life and decisions.
Still, potential residents should weigh notable caveats. A minority of exasperated voices describe severe administrative missteps and alleged neglect, including a transfer to another facility without family consent and concerns about safety during transitions, along with a perception of under-staffing and slow responses in emergencies. These accounts cannot be dismissed, especially for families needing rigid oversight, airtight consent processes, and consistently proactive governance. While not representative of the majority experience, the unfavorable anecdotes signal the importance of scrutinizing policies and ensuring that care plans, transfers, and emergency decisions are transparently documented and consistently honored.
Against these concerns, the strongest positives are hard to ignore. The staff’s professionalism, vigilance, and kindness consistently emerge in reviews, with families praising the level of care provided to loved ones. Families report that issues are addressed promptly, and the team remains attentive and responsive to requests. The leadership, particularly Lenora Womack, is credited with keeping care coordinated and with maintaining clear channels of communication. Cleanliness, safety, and the ability for residents to engage in purposeful activities, music, walking, games, help create a high-quality daily routine that many families value highly when evaluating long-term care options.
Environment and daily life reinforce the care dynamic. Residents benefit from a smaller, less impersonal setting that still offers a broad, safe campus feel. The facility’s social atmosphere and routines appear designed to foster independence within a secure perimeter, with staff who recognize visitors and keep families informed about residents’ activities and changes. For seniors who thrive on regular engagement and personal attention, the combination of professional medical care and meaningful, structured activity tends to translate into a sense of normalcy and dignity. In short, the day-to-day experience tends to be reassuring for families prioritizing ongoing involvement and visible compassion.
Operational diligence remains essential. Prospective families should request explicit transfer policies, consent procedures, and how family input is recorded and acted upon. Meeting multiple staff members, reviewing current care plans, and examining incident logs provide a clearer sense of how the facility handles crises and changes in a resident’s status. Inquire about weekend and night coverage, staffing ratios, and how safety checks are conducted. Given the seriousness of the one-handful of negative reviews, a thorough due-diligence process, tour, discussions, and reference checks, becomes a non-negotiable step before any commitment.
Ultimately, this community stands up well for families seeking dependable, compassionate care delivered in a home-like setting. The consistent praise for staff dedication, clean and safe environments, and engaging activities points to strong day-to-day quality of life for residents. The main caveat, administrative inconsistencies surfaced in a small number of reviews, means potential residents should secure a clear understanding of governance, consent, and transfer procedures before choosing. For families aligned with a culture of open communication and hands-on involvement, St. Judes II offers a compelling balance of warmth and professionalism. If those conditions match the family’s expectations, this is a viable, even excellent, long-term care option.














An In-Depth Look at Reminiscence Therapy in Dementia Care
Dementia-Related Hallucinations: Causes, Experiences, and Practical Approaches
Illuminating Insights About Alzheimer's Disease: Ten Crucial Realities