8422 Andromeda Lane, Bakersfield, CA 93307
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Northpoint Village Assisted Living II
Pros
He was liked and taken good care of at North Point Village.
Cons
The reviewer says the owner Denis Coe is two-faced and out for money.- The reviewer claims he owes them $2,830.00.
- The reviewer notes he has changed his email address and phone number for his business.
- The reviewer has heard that he has a very colorful background.
- The reviewer states that greed is evil and the work of the Devil.
- The reviewer indicates there may be a need to sue him to recover the money.
Review
This community is best suited for families that prize a small, personally attentive living environment where caregivers can establish steady, positive relationships with residents. A resident-facing emphasis on daily care comes through clearly, with one account noting that a resident’s father was liked and well taken care of. In Bakersfield, Northpoint Village Assisted Living II presents as a setting where frontline staff can deliver meaningful, day-to-day support and companionship, which can be decisive for seniors who want warmth and familiarity in their daily routines.
At the same time, those who require ironclad financial transparency and governance should seriously consider alternatives. The most serious concern raised is not the quality of care, but the behavior of the ownership. The reviewer characterizes the owner as primarily money-driven, cites an outstanding personal debt, and notes changes to contact details as well as a background that allegedly raises questions about trust and reliability. Taken together, these points signal potential ongoing risk around billing, accountability, and easy access to management when issues arise. For families who need clear, reliable lines of communication and predictable financial arrangements, this is a critical fault line.
The positive caregiving dynamic cannot be dismissed. The resident who spoke on behalf of their father describes consistent, affectionate attention from staff and an environment where the resident was “liked and taken good care of.” That kind of daily care, reliable staff presence, responsiveness, and person-centered attention, often translates into improved mood, reduced anxiety, and better overall well-being for residents. When weighed against concerns about ownership conduct, these care strengths still matter, especially for residents who require hands-on assistance with mobility, medication reminders, meals, and social integration. The question becomes whether the strength of daily care justifies accepting elevated business risk or opaque financial handling.
The main drawbacks, perceived opportunistic financial behavior, irregularity in owner contact, and the suggestion of a contentious history, directly challenge the long-term stability many families seek. The possibility of disputes, debt, or rapid changes in management can complicate future planning, especially if needs intensify or if caregiving requirements escalate. These factors don’t eliminate the value of good day-to-day care, but they do translate into a real, practical cost: ongoing uncertainty about contracts, billing, and the ability to escalate concerns quickly and effectively.
For families weighing options, several practical steps are prudent. Seek a detailed, written baseline for all fees, deposits, and ongoing charges, with a clear dispute-resolution process and whom to contact for urgent concerns. Request references from other families and independent, third-party testimonials about governance and responsiveness. Confirm that the community operates with a clear, documented management structure, ideally with an administrator or managing partner who is reachable through formal channels. Verify licensing status and any complaint history with state regulators, and demand a transparent point of contact for billing and resident care plans.
Ultimately, the community will best serve families who value the personal warmth of the caregiving staff and are comfortable accepting some ambiguity around ownership and financial practices. It is less suited for households requiring strict, highly professionalized governance, or for those who cannot absorb potential friction between ownership and resident care. If this balance feels precarious, exploring other Bakersfield options with a track record of transparent ownership, stable contact points, and documented, objective care metrics is a wise move. A tour that prioritizes conversations with both care staff and an independent administrator can reveal whether the daily experience aligns with family expectations, and whether governance reflects the reliability demanded by more risk-averse loved ones.
Board and Care Home
Meadows (9 miles away)
Compassionate Conversations: How to Comfort Someone Who Is Grieving
Home Health Care Aides: Understanding Their Role and Supporting Your Family
Urinary Tract Infections in Older Adults: Comprehensive Insights on Symptoms, Treatment, and Prevention