8900 Highway 107, Sherwood, AR 72120
To contact a resident: (501) 835-5931
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Retirement Center of Arkansas
Pros
The Retirement Center of Arkansas is great and takes care of residents' needs, with staff who treat them well.
The staff are friendly, nice, and caring.
The building is older but well maintained.
Meals are good with a varied menu.
Rooms are spacious and include large bathrooms.
The outside environment is quiet and has a pleasant patio and view.
The center provides living room areas and activities to keep residents engaged.
Families report satisfaction and residents enjoy living there.
Cons
The facility was dirty, smelled badly, and felt sad and scary.
The admission staff were rude and annoyed with visitors during lunchtime.
The building was not in the best condition on the inside or outside, and bedbugs were present.
The place consistently smelled of urine and did not ensure basic care like showers, haircuts, or nail trims.
The center had little parking and required sharing bathrooms, which the reviewer disliked.
The reviewer would not want anyone's worst enemy to be cared for at this facility.
The reviewer would not recommend this place for anyone needing care.
Review
Best suited for: The Retirement Center of Arkansas serves best for seniors who want a straightforward, private-room environment with regular meals and attentive staff, and who can live with an older facility that shows its age but is kept reasonably functional. It fits residents who prize routine, safety, and social access, think someone who enjoys on-site dining options, communal living rooms, and a calm, residential setting rather than a glossy, modern campus. Those who are relatively independent but prefer some daily assistance will find it workable, especially if a limited budget is a factor. It is less appropriate for anyone requiring intensive, high-level medical care, constant cleanliness, or a pristine physical plant.
People who should consider alternatives include those who demand meticulous cleanliness and pest control, as at least one account describes persistent odors and bedbug issues. Prospective residents who cannot tolerate smells or inconsistent upkeep should look elsewhere. Those requiring reliable, frequent showers, grooming, or nails care may be frustrated if staff capacity is strained. Those seeking ample parking, single-occupancy bathrooms, or a recently modernized building may be disappointed here. Families with higher acuity care needs or those wanting a more modern campus experience will likely find better value in newer communities with tighter quality controls and clearer admissions processes.
Key advantages center on people and routine: staff members described as nice and available, a private room in a home-like setting, and regular meals with diversity. The on-site common areas and outdoor spaces support social interaction, and the overall environment can feel safe and welcoming for visits and daily life. Counterbalancing these positives are a cluster of durability issues tied to age: the facility’s interior and exterior show wear, and multiple accounts mention odors or inconsistent cleanliness. Parking is limited, and shared bathrooms can complicate daily living. Admissions experiences can be rough when the campus is busy, leaving a negative first impression for families arriving with a loved one.
The positives can offset the drawbacks for families prioritizing routine, nutrition, and accessible staff. A private room plus predictable meals reduces daily stress and helps maintain dignity, while social spaces and structured activities prevent isolation and help residents stay connected. When care needs require a higher level of cleanliness, more consistent maintenance, or a more modern infrastructure, however, these offsets start to wane. In other words, the value hinges on tolerance for aging facilities and on whether dependable staffing and safety outweigh concerns about upkeep and odors.
Families evaluating this community should conduct pointed due diligence: tour during active hours to observe cleanliness and odor firsthand; ask staff what daily care tasks are performed and how often showers, haircuts, and nails are addressed; request candid input from current residents about day-to-day life; inspect the physical plant for maintenance issues and verify parking adequacy; review the admissions process, billing structure, and what is included in the monthly rate; and sample the meals if possible. If the impression is that upkeep is inconsistent or if a higher standard of cleanliness is non-negotiable, consider alternatives with stronger infrastructure. A disciplined comparison against peer facilities will reveal whether the value proposition aligns with care needs and financial realities.
Bottom line: Retirement Center of Arkansas offers dependable staffing, decent meals, and a private room within a budget-conscious, home-like setting. It works best for seniors who value routine, social contact, and a safe, simple environment more than pristine interiors. Families should pursue alternatives if cleanliness, modern amenities, or high-level caregiving are essential. A careful appraisal against better-maintained peers will illuminate whether this community truly fits the loved one’s care needs and budget.








Funding and Affording Assisted Living: A Thorough Overview
Assisted Living Expenses and Long-Term Care Insurance: A Comprehensive Exploration
Securing Financial Support for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Overview