Glassford Place Costs & Pricing
At Glassford Place, residents can expect to pay $3,556 for a studio apartment, which is slightly higher than the average cost in Yavapai County at $3,552 but still more affordable compared to the state average of $3,829. For those seeking a one-bedroom unit, the monthly rate increases to $5,532. This price significantly surpasses both the county's average of $3,927 and Arizona's statewide average of $3,532. Overall, while Glassford Place offers competitive pricing for studios relative to local averages, its one-bedroom options command a premium that reflects the unique services and amenities provided at this residence.
| Floor plans | Glassford Place | Yavapai County | Arizona |
|---|
| Studio | $3,556 | $3,552 | $3,829 |
| 1 Bedroom | $5,532 | $3,927 | $3,532 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Pronghorn Assisted Living
$3,500 to $6,000 / month
4.6 miles away
-
from -$386 / mo
Granite Gate
$3,170 to $5,230 / month
5.0 miles away
-
from -$556 / mo
Pleasant Valley Care Home
$3,000 to $3,400 / month
7.8 miles away
-
About the same
Touchmark At The Ranch
$3,500 to $4,550 / month
5.3 miles away
-
from -$556 / mo
Hidden Oasis
$3,000 to $3,500 / month
2.1 miles away
Overall Review of Glassford Place
common
20 reviews mention this
Friendly, respectful care stands out
Residents and families consistently describe staff as respectful, attentive, and easy to work with.
Across many reviews, residents and families say the staff treats people with respect and learns individuals well. Several mentions highlight timely responses to call buttons and staff being proactive about concerns. Multiple reviewers also describe staff as helpful with practical needs like arranging care follow-ups and supporting day-to-day routines, including help with transfers, toileting, and showers. A few reviews include sharper complaints about staff communication or professionalism, but the overall tone is that staff are caring and supportive day to day.
common
12 reviews mention this
Clean building and comfortable environment
Reviews repeatedly point to a clean, well-kept setting.
Many reviewers say the community is clean and well maintained, including descriptions of it being bright and fresh-smelling. Several also mention cleanliness alongside a comfortable, home-like feel, including one-floor layouts and a central outdoor courtyard that helps the space feel inviting. A small number of reviews contrast this by calling out odors or areas that felt dirty or run down, which suggests experiences can vary from visitor to visitor. Still, cleanliness is a frequent positive theme in day-to-day impressions.
caveat
7 reviews mention this
Staffing issues show up in reviews
Some reviews describe staffing strain that affects consistency and responsiveness.
A recurring concern is that the community can feel shorthanded at times, with comments about limited staffing and uneven coverage. Several reviewers connect staffing strain to communication gaps and to fewer activities actually happening as planned. A few reviews describe especially negative outcomes tied to understaffing and care not meeting expectations, while others say staff do what they can despite shortages. Taken together, the pattern is that care quality is often praised, but staffing levels are a clear vulnerability in some reviews.
common
6 reviews mention this
Activities are a hit or miss
Residents often get daily activities, though some reviews say programming can be inconsistent.
Many reviews mention frequent activities such as games, music, crafts, exercise classes, and outings or community-sponsored events. Some families say their loved ones stayed engaged and didnât spend all day in their rooms. At the same time, multiple reviews criticize a lack of consistencyâeither too few participants, activities not carried out, or limited options depending on staffing. The theme that comes through is that activity availability can vary over time or by unit circumstances.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Dining quality ranges from good to bland
Dining reviews are mixed, with some calling meals tasty and others calling them average or bland.
Several reviews praise meals as well prepared and accommodating, including mentions of room service and staff being willing to adjust meals for preferences. Others describe dining as average cafeteria food, bland, or not appetizing, and a few specifically mention issues like cold plates or portioning. A handful of comments focus on diet needs, including diabetic-related needs and restricted diets, sometimes positively and sometimes as an unmet expectation. Overall, dining is frequently mentioned, but the direction of feedback is not consistent.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
Pricing feels high for some
Some reviewers feel the cost is high relative to what they experienced.
A few reviews mention the overall price as a concern or question whether the experience was worth the money. One review references a high monthly payment and contrasts expectations with what happened shortly after move-in. Another reviewer notes improvements they wanted but still expressed that they didnât feel they got their moneyâs worth. The structured price range provided also shows community pricing varies by unit type, with both units appearing around or above different benchmarks depending on the comparison used.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.