1725 W San Tan Street, Chandler, AZ 85224
To contact a resident: (480) 474-4766
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Golden Touch at Andensen Costs & Pricing
Golden Touch at Andensen offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader market costs in Maricopa County and the state of Arizona. For semi-private rooms, Golden Touch charges $2,000 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $2,801 and the state average of $2,820. Similarly, private rooms at Golden Touch are priced at $2,500, which is notably more affordable than both Maricopa County's average of $3,318 and Arizona's average of $3,345. These cost advantages position Golden Touch at Andensen as an appealing option for individuals seeking quality care without compromising on affordability.
| Floor plans | Golden Touch at Andensen | Maricopa County | Arizona |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $2,801 | $2,820 |
| Private | $2,500 | $3,318 | $3,345 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Home Instead - Fountain Hills, AZ
$1,945 to $3,525 / month22.1 miles away -
from -$139 / mo
Endeavor Senior In-Home - Mesa
$1,861 / month7.7 miles away -
About the same
Garcia's Assisted Living Home LLC
$2,000 / month10.8 miles away -
About the same
Santo Nino Villas 2
$2,000 to $2,300 / month4.4 miles away -
About the same
Martha Bonilla Care Loving Home
$2,000 to $2,200 / month4.3 miles away
Overall Review of Golden Touch at Andensen
Cons
The group home is the worst the reviewer has ever lived in.- Emily is rude and neglectful.
- Emily barely spoke to the reviewer during the seven months they lived there.
- Emily is greedy and shouted at the reviewer when they had no money to pay her upon leaving the nursing home.
- The food Emily serves is disgusting and Spartan.
Review
Golden Touch at Andensen in Chandler is best suited for residents who want a compact, home-like setting and can tolerate a less formal operation where staff interactions may be uneven. This is a place where the environment can feel intimate, potentially allowing for individual attention if the right staff members are on duty. Families that prize a small-house atmosphere and are prepared to supervise and advocate for care daily will find a fit here. For seniors who require steady, proactive oversight and consistently respectful communication, this community may not deliver reliably, and that critical gap should weigh heavily in the decision.
Those considering alternatives should note that the strongest red flags arise from interpersonal dynamics and care responsiveness. A review highlights rude, neglectful behavior by a caregiver-operator who allegedly shouted at a resident when funds were tight, signaling potential for inconsistent care and unpredictable interactions. If dependable staffing, transparent finances, predictable routines, and courteous, proactive care are priorities, this community will likely fall short. In short, approach with caution unless the family is prepared to insist on accountability and steady, respectful care at every shift.
On the upside, the existence of a five-star rating among two reviews suggests there may be moments of genuine rapport and satisfactory care. There could be times when staff members connect well with residents and provide attentive, personalized service. However, the harsh, firsthand account of neglect and coercive behavior dominates the narrative, creating a troubling contrast. This implies significant variability in service quality, hinging on which staff member is on duty and how management responds to concerns. For families prioritizing consistency and dignity, that volatility is a decisive risk.
Key pros, the likely small size and potential for individualized attention, do not sufficiently offset the most serious cons. A resident feeling neglected or shouted at, coupled with reports of subpar meals, undermines safety, dignity, and overall well-being. For residents with cognitive challenges or mobility needs, inconsistent engagement can lead to missed assistance, late meals, or incorrect routines. These are not minor irritants; they are fundamental threats to daily quality of life. Even when some days go smoothly, the documented pattern raises legitimate concerns for anyone who cannot monitor day-to-day care closely.
Prospective movers should pursue a rigorous vetting process: request a day-in-the-life tour at different times, meet multiple caregivers, and observe interactions with residents. Ask for a sample weekly menu and meal timing; verify dietary needs are accommodated. Review recent state inspections and licensing reports, and contact a resident advocate or ombudsman to understand common complaints. Demand clear policies on billing and deposits and observe how management handles issues as they arise. If leadership demonstrates transparency, accountability, and stable staffing, the option becomes more viable; if not, alternatives should be prioritized.
In summary, Golden Touch at Andensen appears best aligned with families who can tolerate a highly intimate, potentially inconsistent care environment and who value a smaller, less polished setting. For most families seeking dependable care, respectful staff relationships, and predictable routines, the balance tips toward exploring other communities. The documented issues, rudeness, neglect, and coercive financial behavior, outweigh intangible advantages of a cozy vibe. Approach decisions with a clear checklist, insist on accountability, and be prepared to move quickly if care standards do not improve. When safety, dignity, and reliable communication are non-negotiable, stronger options will offer far greater confidence.
Board and Care Home
Private
Phoenix Sky Harbor International (11 miles away)
Diabetic care
Intimate 5-resident setting with 24/7 staff, personalized ADL support, diabetes-friendly meals, and engaging activities.
A Comprehensive Exploration of Common Misunderstandings about Powers of Attorney
Senior Move Management: Understanding the Role, Value, and Associated Costs
Weight Training for Seniors: Building Strength and Vitality