Chandler Village

Pros

• The complex is a good place to live, with interior and exterior improvements.
• The complex has been remodeled inside and out, with nice landscaping and brand new air conditioners for every apartment.
• There are good people in the community who hand out food boxes to families in need.
• A reviewer gave the complex five stars for the new management and extensive improvements inside and out.
• Former residents have loved living there.

Cons

• The apartment complex is horrible.
• The complex provides little to no maintenance.
• A door has been missing for two months.
• A maintenance worker messed up the door size and never replaced it.
• There is mold in the bathtub.
• The renovation was poorly done; stairs are falling apart, upstairs cabinet crooked, and the window crooked.
• The office staff cannot manage their duties, including allowing family to move in, providing false information to have cars towed, and issuing parking stickers to relatives.
• The area is described as ghetto.
• There are bed bugs or roaches that eat bed bugs.
• The place is not safe.

Review

The complex comes across as a true mosaic of opinions, with families and individuals offering wildly different snapshots of life there. After two years without a strong sense of consensus, the voices are loud enough to tell a story of stubborn challenges mixed with stubborn resilience. On the one hand, several tenants insist that the place is a low-income housing option that often falls short in the basics. They point to maintenance as a chronic problem, noting that air filters are replaced on a monthly schedule with cheaply sourced, subpar filters, and that practical concerns pile up: a missing door for months, a door that was the wrong size when it was finally replaced, and a sense that repairs are made in a way that feels provisional or temporary rather than thorough. Mold in the bathtub, stairways and upstairs cabinets that feel crooked, and a window that never seems to sit right all add up to a living environment that many tenants describe as far from healthy or pleasant. A renovation period is also recalled with a rueful smile - the work was done, they say, but it looked more like a patchwork than a coherent upgrade, leaving important features unstable or out of alignment.

Other reviewers pull in a harsher social critique that goes beyond fixtures and paint. The atmosphere is described as "kinda ghetto" by those who aren't from the area, with an uneasy undercurrent of safety concerns that clashes with moments of quiet or even neighborliness. One account mentions the complex being unusually quiet during a visit, while others harshly insist that the place is not safe or not well maintained. The same thread of skepticism runs through a memorable claim about office staff and rules: allegations of nepotism and manipulation, including accusations that management tolerated family members moving in, provided misleading information to get cars towed, and expanded parking privileges for relatives. Taken together, these anecdotes sketch a community in which processes and protections feel unstable or unevenly applied, leaving some residents feeling sidelined or underserved.

Pest concerns appear in vivid terms in several accounts - one outright warning about bed bugs or fat roaches that allegedly eat bed bugs - an image that sticks with readers long after the paragraph is finished. Such statements sharpen fears around cleanliness and health, even as other reviews pivot to more positive notes about remodeling and comfort. In this same landscape, there are not just warnings but also moments of validation; some reviewers swear by improvements that followed changes in management. A number of posts celebrate the more positive side of the recent remodels: interior upgrades, landscaping work, and the prospect of brand-new air conditioning in every apartment. For these residents, the complex has become noticeably nicer, suggesting a recent pivot toward a more thoughtfully designed living space.

Human warmth and community also appear in the dialogue, offering a counterpoint to the more critical notes. Visitors and residents alike describe staff or neighbors who were helpful or friendly, even if the overall experience remains muddled. One visitor recalls being aided by people who wanted to help during a weekend visit, and another expresses hope about returning because the environment could be made to feel more welcoming with continued improvements. There are mentions of new management receiving praise in the form of a five-star sentiment, underscoring the belief that leadership changes may be steering the property in a more favorable direction. Nostalgia creeps in too - someone who grew up in the complex says they loved it back then, hinting at a community that has long been a part of local memory and identity.

Equally persistent is the concern for families with children. Several readers lament the lack of engaging playground facilities, describing a hot, underutilized outdoor space that feels more like a bare field than a place where kids can safely play and grow. Run-down playground equipment and a noticeable absence of swings or other activities paint a picture of a space that fails to meet the needs of younger residents. The critique is framed not just in terms of equipment, but of atmosphere: if the area is low income, the expectation is that the complex should still be a place where kids can be kids, roam freely, and experience safe, supervised play. The overall sentiment suggests a real push for amenities that encourage outdoor activity and safe, supervised recreation, especially in a community that could benefit from stronger, more kid-friendly features.

Against the mosaic background, there remains a clear split between experiences that feel workable and experiences that feel deeply disappointing. Some reviewers call the complex "mediocre at best" on first glance but concede that a closer look reveals more serious TLC needs inside and out, while others insist the place has become a good spot to live thanks to renovations and new management. A handful of comments are pragmatic and concise: low-income housing can function and even be adequate, and for certain residents, it does work. Yet other accounts are unabashedly negative, labeling the property as poorly kept, unsafe, or simply not up to the standards one would expect in a well-run community. The spectrum is wide, and the conclusions depend as much on timing, personal expectations, and individual experiences as on any single, objective measure.

In the end, the picture that emerges is not a simple verdict but a living, evolving debate. Some residents remember better days with fondness and a sense of community pride, while others hold fast to the belief that ongoing neglect and management issues undermine the very idea of a stable, healthy home. The same complex that hosts stories of friendly neighbors, food-sharing generosity, and moments of kindness also bears witness to maintenance gaps, safety worries, and a sense that improvements are uneven or incomplete. The balance between new management and old habits, between renovations and ongoing neglect, shapes a place that can feel welcoming and warm at times and frustrating or even alarming at others. For anyone considering moving in, the enduring takeaway is clear: there is potential here, but it comes with a package of significant caveats that deserve careful consideration.

This part of Chandler, Arizona offers a variety of amenities that may be appealing to seniors looking for a convenient and vibrant community. With several restaurants, cafes, pharmacies, places of worship, physicians, hospitals, and transportation options within a few miles radius, residents have easy access to essential services. The presence of the Chandler Crossroads 12 and Chandler Fashion 20 theaters offer entertainment options for those interested in movies. Additionally, Layton Lakes Park provides a nearby outdoor space for leisurely walks or picnics. The area also boasts the presence of reputable healthcare facilities like the Chandler Regional Medical Center and Mercy Gilbert Medical Center for any medical needs. Overall, this part of Chandler presents a well-rounded environment with diverse opportunities for seniors to enjoy a comfortable and fulfilling lifestyle.

Restaurants

• McDonald's (1.1 miles)
• McDonald's (1.4 miles)
• Tom Ryan's (1.9 miles)
• Si Senor (1.9 miles)
• Wendy's (2.1 miles)
• Wendy's (2.4 miles)
• Sidewinder Subs (2.6 miles)

Cafes

• Peixoto Coffee Roasters (1.1 miles)
• Starbucks (3.1 miles)
• Dutch Bros Coffee (4.1 miles)
• Starbucks (4.4 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (2.8 miles)
• Walgreens (2.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3 miles)

Places of Worship

• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (1.8 miles)
• First United Methodist Church of Gilbert (2.5 miles)
• Cornerstone Christian Fellowship (2.7 miles)
• Compass Christian Church (2.9 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (3.6 miles)

Physicians

• Chandler Eyecare (1.9 miles)
• East Valley Center For Pulmonary & Sleep Disorders (1.9 miles)
• Oasis Behavioral Health Hospital (2.3 miles)
• Arizona State Urological Institute (2.3 miles)
• East Valley Family Physicians (2.4 miles)
• Banner Surgery Center - Chandler (2.4 miles)
• Arizona Sun Family Medicine (2.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Banner Health Ocotillo (2.6 miles)
• Chandler Regional Medical Center (3 miles)
• Mercy Gilbert Medical Center (4.6 miles)
• Phoenix ER & Medical Hospital (4.8 miles)

Transportation

• Chandler Municipal Airport (CHD) (2.8 miles)

Theaters

• Chandler Crossroads 12 (3.1 miles)
• Chandler Fashion 20 (4.3 miles)

Parks

• Layton Lakes Park (4.3 miles)