801 Davisson Run Road, Clarksburg, WV 26301
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Clarksburg Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
Pros
The staff there are great, very kind and friendly, and the facility is very clean.
The nursing staff provide great care for residents' rehabilitation.
The facility is an awesome place, with staff who do an awesome job.
Clarksburg Rehab’s staff are friendly and very sweet to residents, and they know what they are doing.
The facility is conveniently located near the hospital and offers a rehab center to support residents’ rehabilitation.
Cons
The facility reportedly withholds water from residents unless it is requested.
Snacks and supplements are not provided for residents, allegedly due to budget constraints.
If residents are hungry or their blood sugar drops, there is nothing available to eat.
The company is described as prioritizing money and bed occupancy over resident care.
The facility is portrayed as discriminatory, with references to racist signage and treatment.
It is described as horrid and unsafe, with alleged threats, violence, and other extreme conditions.
The staff is said to be severely understaffed, with nurses frequently calling off and others left to overwork.
Residents are allegedly neglected, with delays in care and a focus on bingo over medical treatment.
Management and nursing leadership are described as unprofessional and deceptive, with claims that administration lies.
There are serious abuse allegations, including claims of harm to residents and deaths associated with the facility.
The food quality is poor, with meals described as cold or inadequate.
Review
Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center appears best suited for families seeking short-term rehabilitation or transitional care close to a hospital, where initial interactions with staff can feel encouraging and the environment presents as clean and orderly. Several accounts praise the nursing and caregiving staff as kind, attentive, and capable in a rehab setting, and a few reviewers specifically note that the facility is workable for recovering from procedures or strokes when the focus is on therapy and daily oversight. The proximity factor and the ability to coordinate with hospital-based care are real advantages for those prioritizing seamless transitions back home or to a lower level of care.
However, this community demands caution for families managing dementia, long-term chronic conditions, or residents who require reliable, 24/7 skilled nursing supervision. Multiple reviews raise serious concerns about staffing levels, consistency, and timely assistance, with reports of long wait times for call lights and basic requests. The most troubling claims describe inadequate care, neglect, and unsafe conditions, including statements about food, hydration, and overall resident safety. While a few families report positive experiences, the pervasive tenor of the feedback makes it clear that this option warrants thorough due diligence and a conservative assessment of risk for long-term needs.
The strongest pros, the cordial, caring demeanor of some staff and a generally clean facility, do offer real value for residents during rehab episodes and for those who place a premium on personal warmth and a tidy environment. When rehabilitation teams are staffed adequately and responsive, residents can experience meaningful progress and comfortable daily routines. Yet these positives risk being overwhelmed by the more frequently cited negatives: inconsistent staffing, frequent turnover, and repeated anecdotes of inadequate meals, delays in essential services, and insufficient oversight. In short, the care experience can swing dramatically from one shift to the next, which undermines predictability and safety for vulnerable residents.
On balance, the positives may offset the benefits only for short-term rehab goals in a facility that remains stable and well-supervised. For long-term residents or those with dementia, the prevailing concerns about staffing reliability, care consistency, and safety practices create a high threshold for optimism. Families must weigh whether the likelihood of intermittent, uneven care aligns with the resident’s needs and risk tolerance. The facility’s ability to demonstrate sustained staffing consistency, transparent governance, and proactive problem-solving will determine whether the apparent rehab strengths translate into dependable daily care over time.
Families evaluating this center should demand concrete assurances before committing. Ask for current staffing ratios by shift, the cadence of nurse practitioner or physician visits, and the process for responding to call lights. Review the menu and meal service, confirm diabetic-friendly options, and verify hydration practices, snacks, and medication administration schedules. Request current state inspection reports and any corrective action plans, and speak directly with several roommates or their families about day-to-day care experiences. If possible, observe during different times, meals, therapy sessions, and evenings, to gauge consistency and responsiveness.
The bottom line is practical and explicit: use Clarksburg Nursing and Rehabilitation Center as a targeted option for short-term rehab near hospital resources, but proceed with rigorous vetting for any resident requiring steady, high-level skilled care. If staffing stability and proven, attentive care are non-negotiables, alternative facilities with stronger staffing guarantees and clearer governance should be pursued. For families who can tolerate some variability in daily care and who value a clean environment and courteous staff, a disciplined tour and careful questions may reveal a workable fit, but this is not a facility to rely on without safeguards and ongoing oversight.










Understanding Hospice Care at Home: Comprehensive Services, Key Benefits, and Eligibility
Understanding the Full Cost of 24/7 In-Home Care: A Detailed Overview
Exploring the World of Home Health Nurses: Qualifications, Roles, and Hiring Tips