Pristine Senior Living of Oxford

Pros

• The cleanliness of Pristine - Oxford was commendable, with rooms regularly cleaned and facilities maintained well.
• The nurses at Pristine were knowledgeable, kind, and friendly, providing great care to residents.
• STNAs showed exceptional dedication, offering care with dignity and making the experience better for residents.
• Pristine exceeded the expectations of families seeking quality care for their loved ones.
• The staff made efforts to ensure a smooth transition for new residents, prioritizing their comfort and enjoyment in the facility.

Cons

• The management at Pristine Oxford is lacking significantly and often seems disconnected from the needs of residents.
• There were instances of nurses and STNAs being short-staffed, resulting in long wait times for care.
• Residents felt that they were not given enough time during physical and occupational therapy sessions to meet their goals.
• Communication from management was often seen as insincere, with staff giving answers they thought residents wanted to hear instead of addressing concerns truthfully.
• The food provided was criticized for having too many carbohydrates and not enough protein, leaving some residents dissatisfied with their meal options.

Review

Pristine Senior Living and Post-Acute Care of Oxford has garnered mixed reviews from residents and their families, highlighting both commendable aspects and significant areas for improvement. A former resident who stayed at Pristine from March to July 2017 provides a multifaceted perspective on the care received, particularly pertaining to wound care due to Calciphylaxis and Physical and Occupational Therapy. This individual’s experience reflects a blend of positive interactions with staff alongside considerable frustration regarding management practices and staffing issues.

When evaluating cleanliness, the resident rated it a satisfactory 4 out of 5. Rooms were cleaned regularly, but not necessarily every day, which left room for improvement. Nevertheless, other shared spaces were also noted as being clean, suggesting that overall hygiene standards could be consistently maintained across the facility. Such attention to cleanliness is crucial in health facilities—especially those dealing with vulnerable populations—where the risk of infection can significantly impact patient recovery.

The food provided was described as average, scoring a 3 out of 5. While the meals were neither terrible nor outstanding, there seemed to be an excessive emphasis on carbohydrates at the expense of proteins. However, it’s worth noting that staff members responded positively when requests for additional eggs at breakfast were made. This willingness to accommodate dietary preferences demonstrates an understanding of residents’ nutritional needs, even if broader menu options might require reevaluation to promote better health outcomes.

Nursing staff received high marks in this review—scoring a solid 4 out of 5—for their excellence in providing care. They were characterized as knowledgeable, kind, and friendly, all critical attributes in nursing roles where emotional support is just as important as physical care. The State Tested Nursing Assistants (STNAs) achieved an impressive score of 5 out of 5. Their dedication to patient dignity and personalized care enhanced the overall experience for this resident significantly compared to experiences in other facilities.

Conversely, Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) services received a lower rating of 3 due to time constraints in therapy sessions. The former resident expressed frustrations about insufficient therapy time allocated daily to meet rehabilitation goals adequately while also indicating that they faced pushback when seeking explanations about the activities they were expected to perform during sessions. For individuals needing clarity during their recovery processes—like this reviewer—the lack of communication can hinder trust in therapeutic strategies that are critical for successful rehabilitation.

Management practices drew sharp criticism with a stark rating of 1 out of 5 due to perceived inadequacies in addressing residents' needs effectively or authentically communicating with them. The dissatisfaction here hints at systemic issues within administrative operations where managerial disconnects may lead to staff feeling unsupported or overwhelmed in demanding working conditions while compromising patient care quality. Staffing levels further exacerbated these problems; often short-staffed nurses and STNAs managed high patient loads leading to extended wait times for necessary assistance despite delivering high-quality care when present.

Despite these critiques from one resident's perspective reflecting challenges faced by Pristine Oxford's operational components, both family reviews emphasized positive experiences with staff facilitating enjoyable transitions into senior living arrangements for their loved ones. Families appreciated how employees made efforts towards accommodating individual emotional needs amid fears surrounding adjustment challenges elderly residents might face relocating into assisted living environments—a beneficial insight into some strengths still prevailing amidst reported shortcomings within certain service areas at Pristine Senior Living and Post-Acute Care facility.

In conclusion, while many individuals report varying levels of satisfaction based on distinct experiences within Pristine Oxford’s framework—from frontline caregivers taking great pride in exemplary service delivery—to significant management oversight failures hindering operational success—the overarching narrative primarily underscores an industry-wide call for improvements across service delivery systems emphasizing clearer communication protocols amongst therapists/patients alike along with necessary structural changes aimed at bolstering administrative efficacy resonating with both residents’ comfortability factors as well as healthcare personnel morale going forward into future endeavors within skilled nursing settings nationwide.

Parks

• Oxford Parks & Recreation (0.1 miles)
• Oxford Dog Park (1 miles)
• Hueston Woods State Park (5.2 miles)
• Whitewater State Park (12.3 miles)
• Marcum Park (12.7 miles)

Physicians

• Smile Creations (0.2 miles)
• Piper's Therapeutic Massage (0.6 miles)
• Oxford Internal Medicine (0.7 miles)
• Terry G Hunt (0.7 miles)
• Student Health Center (0.9 miles)
• Midwest Eye Center: A Division of TriState Centers for Sight (0.9 miles)
• Tri-State Centers For Sight (0.9 miles)

Pharmacies

• Kroger Pharmacy (0.2 miles)
• Walgreens (0.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (1.9 miles)
• Camden Village Pharmacy (10.1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (10.7 miles)
• Walgreens (12 miles)

Restaurants

• Arby's (0.3 miles)
• Little Caesars Pizza (0.3 miles)
• El Burrito Loco (0.3 miles)
• McDonald's (0.4 miles)
• Bob Evans (0.5 miles)
• Gaslight Brewhouse (0.6 miles)
• Wendy's (0.6 miles)

Cafes

• Patterson's Cafe (0.6 miles)
• Kofenya (0.7 miles)
• Starbucks (0.8 miles)
• Ainsley's Cafe (12.1 miles)
• True West Coffee (12.2 miles)
• Ainsley's Cafe on Brookville Lake (12.9 miles)

Hospitals

• McCullough Hyde Memorial Hospital (0.8 miles)
• Fort Hamilton Hospital (11.1 miles)
• Fort Hamilton Hospital (11.6 miles)
• Mccullough Hyde Ross Medical (12 miles)

Places of Worship

• College Corner United Methodist Church (5.2 miles)
• Fairhaven Community Church (9.3 miles)
• St Mary Church (10.7 miles)
• Macedonia Christian Church (11.2 miles)
• First Church Of God Northside (11.5 miles)
• Maple Grove Baptist Church (12.4 miles)
• St Bridget's Catholic Church (12.5 miles)

Theaters

• Holiday Auto Theatre (8.8 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Moving & Storage (13.5 miles)