360 Chestnut Street, Passaic, NJ 07055
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Chestnut Hill Conv Center
Pros
The facility is a great place to rehabilitate loved ones.- Her grandmother received awesome care.
- The staff were very attentive, especially in therapy services.
- They would recommend the facility.
- Chestnut Hill was nice, clean and a bit modern.
- The staff there were great and very attentive.
- The administrator was very nice.
- The place was big, spacious, and airy.
- The dining room was big, airy, and bright.
- All the staff were extremely attentive and visible, always smiling and cordial.
- There is no better feeling for a daughter than to see her mother well taken care of.
- The nurses seemed on point with vitals, dressings and medications.
Cons
The staff is neglectful and inept.- There is poor communication among the staff and to families.
- They have lost patients’ clothes, dentures, and wigs.
- The mother sustained unexplained bruises and a broken thumb that were discovered by the family.
- Administrators do not return calls or emails.
- The food is inedible and the equipment is antiquated.
Review
Chestnut Hill Conv Center in Passaic is best suited for families seeking short-term, therapy-forward rehabilitation where visible, attentive staff can drive practical recovery outcomes. The facility appears to deliver strong therapy services and hands-on care for residents undergoing post-acute rehabilitation, with multiple accounts praising therapists and daily caregivers who stay engaged with patients. For families prioritizing tangible progress in mobility, strength, and daily functioning, this center can be a workable, reachable option, especially when a nearby location and a straightforward rehab pathway are valued over bells and whistles.
Those for whom this community may not be ideal include families with a heavy emphasis on memory care activities, safety, and consistently proactive administration. Several reviews describe a memory care unit with minimal programming and poor oversight, including lost personal items, unexplained injuries, and a breakdown in communication between staff and families. Administrators who do not return calls or emails further undermine trust in the care team. In short, if reliable, structured memory care and transparent, responsive administration are nonnegotiables, alternatives should be pursued.
The strongest positives, attentive staff during therapy and a generally clean environment, do substantial work to offset certain downsides, but only in narrow, goal-specific ways. When the aim is rehab, therapy-driven progress with supportive staff can outweigh the otherwise dated surroundings. Even reviewers who praise the facility concede that the building and amenities lag behind modern expectations, and they warn that care quality can vary by unit and shift. The flip side is that for long-term memory care or for families seeking a consistently seamless experience across departments (nursing, dietary, housekeeping, social work), the gaps become harder to ignore.
On the operational front, the ongoing tension between commendable frontline care and systemic communication failures is the central contest. Several testimonials emphasize that nurses and aides are hardworking, and some residents or families report satisfaction with cleanliness and the dining experience. Yet the same voices also point to overworked staff, inconsistent communication about patient status, and a social worker focused largely on financials rather than care planning. The result is a facility that can function well for structured rehab and day-to-day well-being, but struggles to deliver the cohesive, safety-forward governance expected in a high-demand memory or long-term setting.
Prospective movers should push for specifics before deciding: what is the current management structure, and how stable is it? What is the actual activity calendar and staffing levels in the memory care unit? Can a family member be granted regular, real-time updates and direct access to the care team? How are safety incidents documented, reviewed, and addressed, and who is responsible for follow-up? A thorough tour should include conversations with direct caregivers, a review of room conditions, and verification of equipment maintenance. If possible, request to observe a routine day in both the rehab wing and the memory care unit to see whether the daily reality aligns with the positive anecdotes and the troubling warnings.
In the end, Chestnut Hill Conv Center emerges as a practical, no-nonsense choice for short-term rehabilitation where the promise of engaged therapy and visibly present staff can translate into real recovery gains. It is less compelling for families whose top priorities are rich memory-care programming, airtight safety oversight, and consistently proactive administration. If the decision hinges on the balance between rehab effectiveness and overall experience, this community earns merit for the former but invites scrutiny for the latter. Alternatives should be considered for those who cannot compromise on safety, communication, and a consistently high standard of long-term care.
111 resident community capacity
Skilled Nursing Facility
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Newark International (12 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
Comprehensive Exploration of Living Wills and Other Advance Directives
A Detailed Exploration of Living Wills and Advance Directives
Comprehensive Guide to Medicare Coverage for Hospice Care
