273 Oak Grove Avenue, Fall River, MA 02723
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Crawford Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center Costs & Pricing
Crawford Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation Center offers a semi-private room at a monthly rate of $6,750, which is notably higher than the average cost in Bristol County ($5,997) and across Massachusetts ($5,805). For those considering private accommodations, the center's price of $7,140 also exceeds both local and state averages - Bristol County's private room costs stand at $6,165 while Massachusetts overall averages slightly lower at $6,090. This positioning reflects Crawford's commitment to providing high-quality care and personalized services that may justify the premium pricing compared to its peers in the region.
| Floor plans | Crawford Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center | Bristol County | Massachusetts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $6,750 | $5,997 | $5,805 |
| Private | $7,140 | $6,165 | $6,090 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Grandview Center
$6,600 / month19.8 miles away -
from -$1340 / mo
The Cottages at Dartmouth Village
$5,410 to $6,720 / month10.5 miles away -
from +$1200 / mo
Grand Islander Center
$7,950 / month15.6 miles away -
from +$210 / mo
Hallmark Nursing and Rehabilitation Center
$6,960 to $7,110 / month10.0 miles away -
from +$750 / mo
Sachem Center For Health & Rehabilitation
$7,500 / month24.5 miles away
Overall Review of Crawford Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
Pros
Human beings deserve better than this.- Fall River deserves much better than this.
- The state would do so much better.
- People can feel safe again.
Cons
The facility is a disgusting, disgraceful dump.- The owners should be ashamed.
- The state would do a much better job running it.
- It is a shame that this facility treats people this way.
- It needs to be investigated by the state and federal authorities so people can feel safe again.
- The ownership and upper staff members should be ashamed.
- The lives of people's family members are at stake.
- Fall River deserves much better than this.
Review
This community is best suited for families facing limited options who are prepared to tolerate severe deficiencies in safety, cleanliness, and accountability. The two published reviews paint a stark picture: a facility beset by filth, neglect, and leadership problems that cast serious doubt on the ability to provide reliable, humane care. In Fall River, this center stands out not for warmth or competence, but for a pattern of complaints that place resident welfare at risk and demand immediate scrutiny from families considering placement.
Those who should consider alternatives are basically every family prioritizing basic safety and dignity for a loved one. If any prospect of clean surroundings, responsive caregiving, clear supervision, and a trustworthy management team matters, if a resident’s daily comfort and protection from harm are nonnegotiable, then other facilities deserve priority. The reviews imply a culture where concerns are not just overlooked but explicitly framed as unacceptable; such a climate is incompatible with steady rehabilitation, routine daily needs, or long-term residence. For anyone weighing options, this is a strong signal to look elsewhere and to demand transparent answers from any prospective facility.
The core cons are overwhelming and highly consequential. The reviews describe an environment described as “disgusting” and a facility that fails basic standards of cleanliness and safety, raising urgent questions about maintenance, sanitation, and resident dignity. Allegations about mistreatment and a culture of neglect create a perceived risk to day-to-day wellbeing, including basic activities of daily living and participation in rehabilitation. The statements extend beyond isolated incidents, pointing to systemic leadership failures, ownership and upper staff repeatedly called out, creating an impression that accountability is absent. The insistence that state or federal authorities should intervene underscores fears about resident protection and regulatory noncompliance. In practical terms, these are not minor irritants; they are fundamental barriers to trustworthy care.
There are effectively no credited pros in the supplied assessments to counterbalance these drawbacks. No positive care attributes, no mention of competent therapy teams, no documented moments of compassion or efficient problem resolution. Without demonstrable strengths, such as clean facilities, attentive staff, clear communication, or reliable clinical oversight, the stated cons stand unchallenged. Even routine considerations like timely response to calls or consistent rehabilitation programming appear unverified, and the absence of any favorable data in these two reviews means prospects cannot rely on hidden strengths to offset the risks.
From a decision-making standpoint, families should insist on facilities with verifiable cleanliness, transparent governance, and robust resident safety protocols. Prioritize places with recent inspection results that show compliance, reputational stability, and positive testimonials from current families. Schedule formal tours, ask to meet caregiving staff and management, and request concrete examples of rehabilitation outcomes, housekeeping standards, and incident tracking. Verify staff-to-resident ratios, response times, and the availability of licensed professionals who can supervise therapy and med management. Pull independent references, and weigh any red flags found in state or inspector records against any claimed strengths.
In conclusion, Crawford Skilled Nursing And Rehabilitation Center should be approached with extreme caution and treated as a last resort. The combination of extreme negative feedback, concerns about cleanliness and safety, and leadership criticism strongly argues against placement for any resident with nonnegotiable standards for care. The prudent course is to pursue alternatives that demonstrate consistent quality in environment, staffing, and governance. Families should invest time in comparing several options, prioritizing facilities with transparent operations, demonstrable quality metrics, and a track record of compassionate, competent care, then move decisively away from this center unless and until compelling, independent evidence emerges that a meaningful turnaround has occurred.
112 resident community capacity
Skilled Nursing Facility
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Air-conditioning
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private
Private bathrooms
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Theodore F Green State (15 miles away)
Community operated transportation
12-16 hour nursing
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Concierge services
Planned day trips
In-Depth Look at the VA Aid and Attendance Program
Nurturing Our Loved Ones: A Daughter's Journey in Caring for Her Mother
Nurturing Our Elders: Linda's Journey of Supporting Her Mother