4302 Highway 1, Raceland, LA 70394
To contact a resident: (985) 537-3569
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of South Lafourche Nursing & Rehab
Pros
The place is described as nice.- The dad receives weekly showers.
Cons
It was described as Hell when it was Raceland Manor.- Extreme negligence by owner Bob Dean, Jr. is alleged, with a warning not to let loved ones end up there.
- Residents are fed poorly, with a claim that people in jail get better food.
- The staff are described as lazy and unwilling to do their jobs.
- It is labeled a horrible place.
- The staff are accused of not doing their jobs.
- It is described as nice but with lazy workers.
Review
South Lafourche Nursing & Rehab in Raceland, LA is best suited for families in the immediate area who must stay local and are prepared to be highly involved in daily oversight. It is not a fit for a loved one who requires reliable, high-quality daily nursing support, consistent hygiene, or steady, attentive staffing. The review history makes clear that a resident with ongoing care needs will need a vigilant family advocate who can move decisively if conditions don’t improve. In short, this community should be considered only as a temporary, highly supervised option when there are few alternatives, and only with a concrete plan to transition to a higher‑quality setting.
Those who should seriously consider alternatives include families prioritizing dependable staffing, prompt responsiveness, and respectful administration. If memory care, constant assistance with bathing and dressing, or timely medication management are nonnegotiable, this facility is unlikely to meet those expectations based on repeated concerns about understaffing, irregular care, and disengaged workers. Prospective residents with options elsewhere will gain far more long-term security by choosing a setting with a demonstrated commitment to consistent care, transparent leadership, and reliable daily routines.
The few positives that might be perceived, such as a facility that presents as pleasant in appearance and a few staff members who put in effort, do not meaningfully offset the chronic downsides. Reports consistently describe extreme negligence and unresponsive leadership as the underlying problem, with residents receiving insufficient showering, substandard meals, and care that feels perfunctory at best. The association with an owner whose other facilities are cited in strongly negative terms compounds the risk, suggesting a pattern rather than isolated incidents. The overall care climate here tends to undermine trust, even when some staff members show genuine dedication on certain days.
To decide with confidence, families should insist on a rigorous, objective set of guardrails before committing. Require a detailed, written care plan with explicit, measurable goals and timelines, and demand regular progress reviews. Institute frequent, in-person check-ins by a trusted advocate, and obtain the most recent state surveys, staffing data, and any corrective action plans. Consider supplementing with an independent home health aide or a temporary caregiving arrangement during peak times to bridge gaps in care. Maintain a clear escalation path for any delay in response or lapse in basic services, and be prepared to transition promptly if expectations are not met.
Tours and conversations should focus on practical realities: observe meal service, talk with current residents about daily routines, and watch how staff handle call bells and urgent needs. Ask to see the most recent inspection results and ask about staffing ratios across shifts, turnover rates, and the administrator’s responsiveness to concerns. Look for consistent, visible leadership on the floor, a track record of addressing complaints, and evidence of clean, safe environments. Red flags to flag now include high staff turnover, delayed or missing care tasks, and vague or evasive answers about problem resolution.
Bottom line: this community is not a default choice for families seeking stable, high-quality skilled care. For those with limited options, it can function as a stopgap only if a strict oversight framework is in place and a clear exit plan is ready. In practice, the prudent course is to compare alternatives with hard data on staffing, care quality, and resident satisfaction, and prefer facilities where care delivery and leadership are transparent, dependable, and consistently responsive. If stronger options exist, prioritize them; if not, pursue a tightly managed, time-limited arrangement with a concrete plan to transition to a higher standard of care.
Skilled Nursing Facility
Activities off-site
Beautician on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Supportive Employee Benefits That Help Caregivers Attain Better Work-Life Harmony
Top Cars for Senior Drivers and Essential Safety Innovations
A Closer Look at Private Pay Home Care