1110 West 11Th Street, Concordia, KS 66901
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Mount Joseph Senior Village
Pros
The facility is amazing.
The facility is clean and staffed by nice people.
The staff are kind, courteous, and caring.
They take very good care of residents.
Mt. Joseph Senior Village is highly recommended for loved ones to be well cared for.
The Pig is a positive asset that helps bring happiness to the elderly.
The rooms are well kept and clean.
The food and food service are very good.
Jazmine Ukens is described as one of the most caring aides.
The nurses are excellent.
Cons
The business is closed and no longer in operation.
The facility is appreciated only by those who tolerate a lack of respect and human decency, and the five-star reviews are claimed to be inauthentic.
There is a high turnover of staff.
Although most aides are respectable, there are reports of frequent phone use, foul language, under-table texting during care, and residents being ignored or hurried without assistance.
It is noted that only a few nurse aides treat residents with respect, implying that the majority do not.
Review
Mount Joseph Senior Village in Concordia, Kansas, is best suited for families seeking a clean, home-like assisted living setting where attentive staff create daily warmth for residents who don’t require high-acuity medical care. The community’s strongest selling point is the predictable, manageable environment: tidy rooms, well-kept common spaces, and a staff presence that generally reads as courteous and approachable. For seniors who prize routine, straightforward support, and a non-clinical atmosphere, Mount Joseph offers a practical, comfort-first option that can feel like a true home away from home.
However, serious caveats exist. Prospective residents who need stable, consistently respectful staffing over time may want to consider alternatives. Reports of high turnover and uneven behavior among some aides raise questions about continuity of care. Additionally, one review explicitly claims the business is closed, signaling a viability risk that could devastate arrangements for a loved one who depends on ongoing services. The mixed signal about current operation status means vigilance is essential before any commitment.
On the plus side, the facility earns frequent praise for cleanliness and the general caring demeanor of staff. Families describe rooms and common areas as well kept, and nurses are praised as excellent. In several accounts, aides who engage with residents in a personal, compassionate way, such as Jazmine Ukens, have made a meaningful difference, and the activities environment is highlighted by mentions of light-hearted touches like a therapy pig helping happiness among residents. These elements create a sense of warmth and daily quality that many families value deeply.
Yet there are well-documented tensions behind the glossy surface. Even among a majority of respectful aides, others note heavy phone use, profanity, and inappropriate chatter during meals and caregiving tasks. Instances of residents being rushed or ignored, rather than assisted, surface in some reviews, underscoring a risk that call-light responsiveness can vary by shift or staff member. High turnover compounds these concerns, limiting consistency in everyday routines and the sense of familiarity residents rely on for comfort and safety.
Where the pros land against these cons depends on what matters most to the family. If cleanliness, a genuine, personable staff, and dependable dining are non-negotiables, Mount Joseph delivers, at least in the experiences of many residents and families. The care quality described by several reviewers, particularly when the nursing team is praised, can offset moderate friction in daily operations. The central tension remains: stability and long-term viability must be verified, and the possibility of leadership or program disruption could erode the benefits if not carefully managed.
For families seriously evaluating Mount Joseph, the prudent path is a thorough visit and explicit diligence: confirm current operating status and licensing, ask about staff retention and on-shift supervisor oversight, request to meet multiple caregivers, and speak with several residents or family contacts about the consistency of care. In practical terms, this community can be a strong fit for seniors who value a clean, homey environment with compassionate interactions and good meals, provided the operation is currently ongoing and stability is achievable. If long-term viability or uniform staff discipline is a priority, alternatives with more consistent staffing and proven continuity are worth a close look.











Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences




