EPOCH Senior Healthcare of Sharon Costs & Pricing
EPOCH Senior Healthcare of Sharon offers semi-private rooms at a monthly cost of $7,500, which reflects the premium level of care and personalized services provided at this facility. When compared to the average costs in Norfolk County and across Massachusetts, where semi-private accommodations are priced at approximately $6,142 and $5,805 respectively, EPOCH's rates are notably higher. This disparity can be attributed to the enhanced amenities and specialized support that EPOCH is known for, ensuring residents receive an exceptional standard of living tailored to their needs. While the pricing may be above the regional averages, it signifies a commitment to quality care and individualized attention that families often seek for their loved ones.
| Floor plans | EPOCH Senior Healthcare of Sharon | Norfolk County | Massachusetts |
|---|
| Semi-Private | $7,500 | $6,142 | $5,805 |
Skilled Nursing Facilities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
One Wingate Way
$7,675 to $10,700 / month
11.1 miles away
-
from -$900 / mo
Grandview Center
$6,600 / month
19.1 miles away
-
from +$800 / mo
The Falls At Cordingly Dam
$8,300 to $9,050 / month
13.0 miles away
-
from -$385 / mo
Soldiers Home In Massachusetts
$7,115 / month
19.9 miles away
-
from +$1050 / mo
Wingate At Norton
$8,550 / month
11.1 miles away
Overall Review of EPOCH Senior Healthcare of Sharon
common
16 reviews mention this
Staff are described as caring
Many residents and families describe the staff as kind, patient, and responsive to concerns.
Across multiple reviews, families describe frequent reassurance, helpful check-ins, and care teams that treat residents with dignity. Several reviewers also call out specific nursing and therapy staff members by name, describing them as attentive and solution-oriented when questions come up. Even in critical reviews, residents are discussing staff attention and how well day-to-day help is delivered.
differentiator
3 reviews mention this
Dementia care gets praise
Residents describe strong nursing and activity support for dementia care.
Multiple reviewers connect the quality of care to memory care and dementia, including praise for the nursing approach and day-to-day support. Families describe the memory care environment as a place where residents stay engaged through structured activities. Reviewers also mention consistent therapy involvement as part of that overall care experience.
common
5 reviews mention this
Activities keep residents engaged
Residents and families mention ongoing activities that help keep people engaged.
Several reviews highlight daily engagement through exercise, crafts, group events, and holiday or birthday celebrations. Families describe activity staff as creative and attentive to residentsâ capabilities, and some mention regular outside guests and therapy dogs. One memory-care reviewer also describes family communication connected to the activities and updates.
caveat
3 reviews mention this
The facility is described as outdated
Some reviews say the building needs updating and that visible wear stands out.
A few reviewers acknowledge that the facility looks older and could use updates like paint or a general makeover. Others also mention day-to-day wear that is noticeable, such as scuffed walls. Even when care is praised, reviewers still point to the physical condition as something they felt needed attention.
caveat
5 reviews mention this
Cleanliness and basic care come into question
Several reviews describe hygiene problems and instances of neglectful basic care.
Multiple critical reviews mention odors, an unhygienic or filthy environment, and residents being left in poor conditions for extended periods. Some reviewers describe shortages that affected care tasks, such as running out of supplies when changes were needed. Together, these accounts point to breakdowns in basic cleanliness and caregiving routines.
caveat
2 reviews mention this
Communication and follow-through are criticized
A couple of reviews criticize communication and medication or administration follow-through.
One review describes repeated problems with meals not matching requests and medication mismanagement, including a lack of clear communication around what was being administered and when. Another critical review says administration did not return calls, while also describing rude interactions and repeated issues. These reports focus less on overall friendliness and more on how well information and responsibilities were handled.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.