5881 Hillview Park Ave, Valley Glen, CA 91401
To contact a resident: (818) 988-3320
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Shalev Senior Living #1 Costs & Pricing
Shalev Senior Living #1 offers a range of accommodation options with pricing that reflects its premium services and amenities compared to broader regional averages. For private rooms, the monthly cost stands at $4,800, which is notably higher than Los Angeles County's average of $4,197 and California's overall average of $3,939. Similarly, studio apartments at Shalev are priced at $5,500, surpassing the county's average of $4,172 and the state average of $4,145. This pricing strategy suggests an emphasis on quality care and personalized attention that may appeal to families seeking exceptional living conditions for their loved ones in a competitive market.
| Floor plans | Shalev Senior Living #1 | Los Angeles County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $4,800 | $4,197 | $3,939 |
| Studio | $5,500 | $4,172 | $4,145 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$200 / mo
Sweet Home Senior Living #1
$5,000 to $7,500 / month0.1 miles away -
from -$300 / mo
Ardenville Home Care I
$4,500 / month5.3 miles away -
from -$800 / mo
Land of Peace 6
$4,000 to $5,500 / month11.1 miles away -
from +$200 / mo
A Caring Touch Board and Care
$5,000 / month10.0 miles away -
from -$300 / mo
Royal Oaks Inn
$4,500 / month24.3 miles away
Overall Review of Shalev Senior Living #1
Pros
They took care of him very well.- Shalev really seemed to care about their residents.
- The staff organized social activities to stimulate residents’ minds.
- The manager was helpful and spent ample time answering questions.
- The atmosphere was comfortable.
- The staff seemed dedicated.
Cons
The furnishings had all seen better days and some had many stains on them.- Some furnishings were stained.
- They weren’t sure if this type of place was right for their mother-in-law.
- There was a negative reaction, expressed as "Yikes!"
Review
Shalev Senior Living #1 in Valley Glen is best suited for families seeking a warm, person‑centered assisted living where care teams are visibly engaged and daily life includes structured social activities. It works well for a resident who thrives on routine, companionship, and programs designed to stimulate the mind and foster community. The setting reads as a small, home‑like environment rather than a clinical behemoth, with a clearly caring staff presence. Those prioritizing a polished, upscale aesthetic or requiring advanced clinical oversight may want to consider alternatives.
The core strengths here are the care culture and the front‑line responsiveness. In one family’s experience, a manager spent substantial time touring, answering questions, and inviting trust through transparent communication, a sign that questions and concerns are not brushed off. Residents appear to be engaged rather than idle, with social activities woven into the day rather than left to chance. The atmosphere feels comfortable and welcoming, reinforcing a sense that staff are invested in each resident’s well‑being, not just their daily routine.
There are pragmatic drawbacks that color the decision. Furnishings show their age, stains and wear are noticeable, but these cosmetic issues do not reflect on safety or the level of attention residents receive. The overall vibe, a crowd gathered in the living room watching television, staff moving with purpose, and residents interacting, supplies a homey, ordinary life rhythm rather than a gleaming, showroom feel. For some families, cosmetic wear matters; for others, it’s a minor quibble in exchange for reliable, attentive care.
Who might want alternatives? Families seeking a facility with a more modern interior or with a stronger emphasis on clinical sophistication may find Shalev lacking in those areas. The reviews hint at a potential misfit for relatives who aren’t as comfortable with a smaller, more intimate setting or who want more specialized memory care or medical services under one roof. The expressed uncertainty about whether this type of place was right for a specific relative underscores that Shalev isn’t a universal solution; it serves a segment that prioritizes care culture and social vitality over cosmetic polish.
The key pros, dedicated staff, a tangible focus on social engagement, and a transparent, accessible management presence, offset the cons in a meaningful way. For families where peace of mind comes from knowing staff notice and respond to daily needs, and where residents benefit from regular activities and community life, Shalev delivers practical value that beats a clinical, impersonal environment. The care ethos matters more than the superficial ambiance, and in that respect the community earns a credible endorsement for those priorities.
Practical next steps for families considering Shalev are clear. Schedule a tour at different times to observe staff–resident interactions and a sample activity, then ask pointed questions about staffing levels, care plans, and how changes in a resident’s needs are managed. Inquire about room and common‑area upkeep, renovations, and any upcoming improvements to decor. If memory care or higher medical oversight is a must, verify what specialized options exist on campus or nearby, and review guest access, transportation, and respite care policies. With a solid sense of the day‑to‑day rhythm and a clear view of how staff respond in real time, a decision can be made with confidence about whether Shalev aligns with the resident’s values and the family’s expectations.
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Beautician on-site
Indoor common areas
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Swimming pool / hot tub
Wheelchair accessible showers
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena (4 miles away)
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Medication management
Kosher
Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences
