2212 Trower Ave, Napa, CA 94558
To contact a resident: (707) 280-3608
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Celebrity Haven II Costs & Pricing
At Celebrity Haven II, the monthly costs for accommodations reflect a premium experience that aligns with the high standards of care and amenities provided. For semi-private rooms, residents can expect to pay $4,500, which is notably higher than both Sonoma County's average of $4,052 and California's overall average of $3,333. Private rooms come at a monthly rate of $5,500, again surpassing local and state averages - Sonoma County charges approximately $4,225 while California averages around $3,939. The most significant investment is in the studio apartments at Celebrity Haven II, priced at $6,000 per month compared to Sonoma County's average of $4,340 and California's average of $4,145. This pricing structure indicates that Celebrity Haven II offers an elevated level of care and service tailored for those seeking an exceptional living environment.
| Floor plans | Celebrity Haven II | Sonoma County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $4,500 | $4,052 | $3,333 |
| Private | $5,500 | $4,225 | $3,939 |
| Studio | $6,000 | $4,340 | $4,145 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Assisted Living Napa Valley II
$4,500 / month0.9 miles away -
from -$505 / mo
The Watermark at Napa Valley
$3,995 to $6,795 / month0.4 miles away -
from -$850 / mo
Good Neighbor Care Vacaville
$3,650 to $4,150 / month20.1 miles away -
from -$800 / mo
Silva Board And Care
$3,700 to $5,367 / month22.8 miles away -
from -$250 / mo
Vista Prado
$4,250 to $6,250 / month14.3 miles away
Overall Review of Celebrity Haven II
Pros
The staff were very nice.
Cons
The house needed some sprucing up, especially on the inside.- The furniture was quite worn, with sheets thrown over.
- The location is too far away from town.
Review
Celebrity Haven II in Napa is best suited for seniors who prize personal, attentive caregiving over the polish of a showroom. The staff’s warmth and steady availability create a reassuring daily rhythm for residents who need help with routine tasks and desire a calm, low-stress environment. That care focus matters most when daily support and predictable schedules are the priority. However, the interior and campus presentation lag behind the level expected in many Napa communities, signaling an older, more modest model. For families who insist on contemporary decor or abundant on-site amenities, this residence will feel behind the curve from the moment of entry.
Alternatives should be considered by anyone who cannot tolerate distance from town or who wants interiors that feel refreshed and inviting. The location is notably distant from downtown Napa, which complicates errands, appointments, and casual visits with family. The lack of recent sprucing is evident in common areas and rooms, contributing to a mood that is more tired than homey. In short, for those who expect frequent access to shops, restaurants, or easy highway access, other communities will serve better.
On the upside, the staff’s evident kindness translates into meaningful daily support; residents likely experience consistent help with activities of daily living and a feeling of being seen. This emotional and practical engagement can offset certain inconveniences, especially for seniors who thrive on stable routines and person-centered attention. Still, warmth cannot fully compensate for a dated ambiance or a far-from-town location, and those factors ultimately shape overall satisfaction and decisions about long-term placement.
The core drawbacks are material and logistical: the house needed sprucing up, with interiors showing wear; furniture was worn, and sheets were draped over, signaling a need for refreshment and maintenance attention. These signs of aging can affect comfort, dignity, and perceived safety, particularly for residents who spend much time in common spaces or in private rooms. The combination of an aged aesthetic and limited nearby conveniences compounds the risk that daily life will feel unstimulating or claustrophobic over time.
Thus, while the staff is a clear strength, the cons tilt the balance toward seeking alternatives unless the priority is immediate, dependable companionship and low drama in a simpler setting. For families valuing a polished atmosphere, easy access to services, and well-maintained interiors, Celebrity Haven II likely falls short. If the choice hinges on cost or the belief that care quality will compensate for other weaknesses, proceed with caution and arrange multiple visits to see if improvements or better days are visible.
Practical next steps: arrange a tour focused on timing of routines, maintenance responsiveness, and the condition of bedrooms and shared spaces. Ask whether there are ongoing or planned sprucing projects and what the renovation timeline looks like. Inquire about how frequently furnishings are refreshed and whether the dining and activity spaces meet current usability standards. Compare with other Napa options that emphasize modern interiors and closer proximity to town, and verify with staff about trial stays or temporary visits to gauge day-to-day life. The bottom line: Celebrity Haven II offers genuine caregiver warmth, but the combination of aging interiors and a remote location makes it essential to verify that this arrangement will meet the resident’s long-range needs.
Board and Care Home
Memory Care
Cats allowed
Dogs allowed
Private
Incontinence care
Memory Care Pathways: A Holistic Guide to Dementia Support
Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences