16825 Ash Drive, Fontana, CA 92337
To contact a resident: (909) 684-0108
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Annie's Haven Costs & Pricing
At Annie's Haven, the costs for various room types are notably competitive compared to both San Bernardino County and the broader California market. For a semi-private room, residents can enjoy a monthly fee of $2,200, which is significantly lower than the county average of $2,958 and the state average of $3,333. Similarly, the one-bedroom accommodations at Annie's Haven are priced at $3,000, offering a favorable alternative to the county's rate of $3,548 and California's higher statewide average of $4,340. Furthermore, private rooms at Annie's Haven also maintain an attractive price point at $3,000 - just below the county's cost of $3,561 and favorably positioned against the state average of $3,939. These pricing strategies reflect Annie's commitment to providing quality care while ensuring affordability for its residents.
| Floor plans | Annie's Haven | San Bernardino County | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,200 | $2,958 | $3,333 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,000 | $3,548 | $4,340 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,561 | $3,939 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Annie's Haven
Pros
Annie’s Haven has many nice reviews.
A very nice lady welcomed visitors at the door.
The reviews reflect a positive impression of Annie’s Haven.
Cons
They felt they were judged by the color of their skin.
Ana did not accept applications because the company was closing.
The reviewer’s family was not given a chance.
Review
Annie’s Haven in Fontana is best suited for families seeking a dementia-focused, small-scale setting that presents a warm, welcoming stance at the door, but with the clear caveat that the facility’s operation appears in a state of flux. The handling at the front desk is described as courteous and friendly, which matters for first impressions and initial trust. However, the administrator stated that no new applications are being accepted because the company is closing. That combination, a pleasant, homey vibe paired with an admissions bottleneck and an uncertain future, means this community is not a practical choice for families needing immediate placement, stable availability, or long-term continuity.
Those considering alternatives should include other Fontana-area options with active admissions and clearly defined timelines. Families with an urgent need to place a loved one, especially someone with dementia requiring ongoing, dependable care, should prioritize communities that can guarantee intake and continuity. Additionally, the report raises a warning flag for anyone who expects equitable, non-discriminatory treatment during the inquiry process. The sense that skin color factored into the interaction is a serious concern and should prompt families to scrutinize providers more carefully and seek options with transparent, inclusive policies.
The positive elements, principally the courtesy of staff and the lure of a favorable prior reputation, do not meaningfully offset the core drawbacks. A kind front-desk experience and the hope of a well-regarded past do not compensate for a facility that is not accepting new residents or committing to a future opening. In senior care, stability and predictability are non-negotiable; without admissions, there is no viable path for care, transition planning, or financial arrangements. Prospective families must weigh the warmth of initial contact against the reality that the community cannot currently fulfill the fundamental purpose of a senior living option.
From a risk perspective, the main red flags are concrete and worth heeding. The stated closing status implies potential disruption, sudden changes in availability, and uncertainty around staffing and operations. The admission pause prevents any realistic path to placement, care planning, or coordination with family members and medical professionals. On top of that, the reported perception of bias in the early contact adds a nontrivial quality-of-care risk: when residents or families feel unfairly judged, the likelihood of a comfortable, trusting caregiver–resident relationship declines, reducing overall care quality and satisfaction even if a place reopens later.
In practical terms, families should act decisively now. Confirm the facility’s current status in writing and request a formal update on any plans to reopen admissions, including a projected timeline and contingency options. If considering Annie’s Haven as a temporary hold or potential future option, insist on written commitments and a clear transfer plan to another community if circumstances change. In parallel, compare multiple nearby communities with active admissions, licensing histories, and verifiable references from current families. Schedule in-person visits to observe resident interactions, food and activity programs, safety measures, and how staff handle questions about care plans and transitions.
The bottom line is clear: Annie’s Haven offers a compassionate facade and a respectful initial encounter, but those strengths are overshadowed by a closing status and a blocking admissions policy. For families needing reliable placement in Fontana, this is not the practical choice today. Consider other dementia-focused communities with open admissions, transparent timelines, and a demonstrated commitment to equitable care. If curiosity about Annie’s Haven persists, approach with strict expectations for written confirmations, a concrete reopening plan, and leverage this as a contingent option only after all solid alternatives have been exhausted.






























Comprehending Evening Confusion in Dementia: Causes, Manifestations, and Support
Delirium and Dementia: Unraveling the Key Differences
Are Dementia and Alzheimer's Disease Lethal? A Comprehensive Exploration








