The Firs Costs & Pricing
The Firs offers competitive pricing for its living arrangements in comparison to both Thurston County and the broader state of Washington. For a studio apartment, residents can expect to pay $3,125, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,131 and the state average of $4,126. Similarly, the one-bedroom unit at The Firs is priced at $3,725, undercutting both Thurston County's average of $4,085 and Washington's statewide average of $4,632. Interestingly, when it comes to two-bedroom options, The Firs stands out with a rate of $5,115; however, this figure surpasses Thurston County's average of $3,092 but remains competitive against the state average of $4,301. Overall, residents can find appealing value at The Firs across different room types while enjoying quality amenities and community features.
| Floor plans | The Firs | Thurston County | Washington |
|---|
| Studio | $3,125 | $4,131 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,725 | $4,085 | $4,634 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $5,115 | $3,092 | $4,301 |
Independent Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$125 / mo
Revel Lacey
$3,250 to $4,495 / month
4.1 miles away
-
from -$575 / mo
Sound Vista Village
$2,550 to $3,150 / month
22.0 miles away
-
from -$215 / mo
Weatherly Inn-Tacoma
$2,910 to $5,940 / month
21.0 miles away
-
from -$500 / mo
Rosedale Village, LLC
$2,625 / month
19.6 miles away
-
from -$140 / mo
Brookdale Allenmore IL
$2,985 to $4,240 / month
21.2 miles away
Overall Review of The Firs
common
85 reviews mention this
Caring staff shows up daily
Residents and visitors consistently describe staff as caring, professional, and attentive.
Across many reviews, people emphasize that staff members are kind and responsive, and that they help residents feel known and supported. Several reviewers mention specific moments like checking in on residents, knowing names, or making sure people are okay around meals. Families also describe confidence in the community’s safety and support once someone moves in, including when needs change. Even in more mixed reviews, the friendliness and helpfulness of staff still come through.
differentiator
48 reviews mention this
Dining feels restaurant-style
Dining is repeatedly described as restaurant-style with flexible meal access.
Many reviews talk about the dining room experience as more than cafeteria-style food, including praise for meals, variety, and presentation. Residents and families also describe being able to eat at different times during open hours, which matches the community’s restaurant-style dining approach. Several mentions connect dining to chef attention and menu changes, with some reviewers highlighting dietary options and substitutions when preferences differ. A few reviewers rate the food as only “okay,” but still cite alternatives and choices.
common
45 reviews mention this
Activities and outings keep busy
Activities are a major part of daily life, with frequent programs and outings.
Reviews frequently describe a steady schedule of activities, including group exercise, crafts, classes, and regular events. People also mention outings like trips to stores, scenic drives, and community-style gatherings. Several reviewers point out that residents can choose how involved they want to be, from quiet time to joining in. Taken together, the reviews portray activities as a consistent reason residents stay engaged.
common
24 reviews mention this
Location and nearby care access
The community’s location is repeatedly praised for convenience to medical offices.
Multiple reviewers bring up convenience to healthcare, including being close to a hospital and medical providers, which makes visiting and appointments easier. Families also mention the practicality of this access when someone is getting treatment or needs frequent follow-up. In addition to medical proximity, some reviews highlight nearby walking options and the feel of the grounds. Overall, the location shows up as a recurring practical advantage in how people experience visits and day-to-day logistics.
caveat
9 reviews mention this
Not fully assisted, independence focus
Some reviewers caution that care support may not match needs that require more help.
While many people report feeling well-supported, a subset of reviews warns that the community is positioned for independent living rather than higher-support care. One reviewer describes moving someone out when more assistance was needed elsewhere, and another notes a limitation related to accessibility or functional support needs. A different reviewer also raises a question about fall-related authority on-site. These comments suggest fit depends on the level of assistance a person truly needs.
caveat
12 reviews mention this
Pricing can be a deciding factor
Affordability comes up as a frequent deciding factor in reviews.
Several reviewers mention budget and whether the community feels like good value, especially when comparing pricing to what’s included. Some families describe affordability as strong, while others say it was outside their budget or only affordable with specific timing or offers. There are also comments linking costs to apartment size and plans, reinforcing that the “right fit” often depends on what unit type and services are most important. Overall, cost appears as a meaningful part of the decision for both choosing and passing on the community.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.