22816 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98020
To contact a resident: (425) 771-5633
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Avalon Retirement Living Costs & Pricing
Avalon Retirement Living offers competitive pricing for its residents compared to the broader market in Snohomish County and the state of Washington. For a studio, the monthly cost at Avalon is $1,480, significantly lower than the county average of $4,443 and the state average of $4,126. Similarly, a one-bedroom apartment at Avalon is priced at $2,100, whereas comparable accommodations in Snohomish County reach approximately $5,080 and statewide at around $4,632. Interestingly, for two-bedroom units, while Avalon charges $2,450 - higher than its own studio and one-bedroom options - it still remains more affordable than the county average of $3,924 and the state figure of $4,301. Overall, Avalon Retirement Living provides a favorable financial option for those seeking quality retirement living without breaking the bank.
| Floor plans | Avalon Retirement Living | Snohomish County | Washington |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,480 | $4,443 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,100 | $5,080 | $4,634 |
| 2 Bedrooms | $2,450 | $3,924 | $4,301 |
Independent Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Avalon Retirement Living
Pros
Edmonds Village Senior Living is exceptional.
The building is beautiful with modern and elegant spaces that feel welcoming and uplifting.
The team is kind and caring, dedicated to residents' comfort, happiness, and well-being every day.
The dining at Compass Rose is delicious and offers a restaurant-style experience with plenty of choices.
The café serves fresh, in-house muffins, adding to a wonderful dining experience.
Residents are friendly and welcoming, fostering a genuine sense of community and connection.
For luxury independent senior living in Edmonds, the community delivers on style, warmth, great dining, and caring people.
The staff goes above and beyond every day, being friendly, attentive, and genuinely caring about making residents feel at home.
The variety of activities and social events keeps everyone engaged and connected.
Itâs a place where people thrive, build friendships, and enjoy independence with support when needed.
Cons
Wendy ruined the reviewerâs experience with this company.
There was no response from Wendy Kleppe, indicating poor communication.
The rooms in the building are not ADA compliant, and the ownership is aware of this.
Members of the ownership group were reportedly aware of the deficiencies and suggested itâs only an issue if someone files a lawsuit.
The reviewer claimed that the ownership is putting loved ones at risk for profit.
Review
Avalon Retirement Living in Edmonds fits best for seniors who want a luxury, independent living environment with a vibrant social calendar, restaurant-style dining, and a campus feel that supports autonomy with visible care when needed. The spaces are described as modern and welcoming, with a design that signals comfort and a sense of occasion. This community rewards residents who value frequent engagement, beautifully appointed common areas, and opportunities to connect with peers through planned activities, outings, and on-site dining experiences. In short, it targets those who want resort-like amenities and a polished atmosphere while preserving the freedom to manage daily living largely on their own terms.
That said, alternatives should be on the radar for anyone whose top priorities include rock-solid management responsiveness, guaranteed accessibility in every unit, or a stricter budget. Several reviewers flagged inconsistent communication from leadership, with specifically named contacts delivering uneven experiences. When a potential resident needs timely updates, rapid issue resolution, or a consistently proactive point person, these experiences matter. For families seeking a straightforward, reliable line of communication, consider other communities with blemish-free management track records or with a policy of direct, predictable follow-through. Accessibility and prompt responsiveness are not optional features here; theyâre a decision driver.
The strongest positives center on the buildingâs aesthetics and the programmatic core. The campus atmosphere is described as warm and inviting, with a deck that features a pizza oven and a grill that encourages casual social moments. The Compass Rose restaurant-style dining and an in-house cafe contribute to a sense of occasion that many families want for daily life. Staff are repeatedly characterized as kind, attentive, and deeply invested in residentsâ comfort, happiness, and well-being. A robust slate of activities, social events, and outings provides meaningful engagement and opportunities to form real connections, which can translate into enhanced quality of life and greater independence for residents who thrive in a lively, well-supported setting.
However, several critical caveats temper the enthusiasm. The most disquieting concerns involve management communication and accountability. Reports of little to no response from a named administrator create a risk for families seeking predictable service levels, especially when questions arise about finances, maintenance requests, or move-in logistics. Also raised are serious allegations about accessibility: a former maintenance director claimed rooms are not ADA compliant and that noncompliance stems from profit motives. These claims are significant because they touch safety, daily usability, and long-term planning for residents with mobility needs. While other reviews celebrate transformation under new leadership and praise staff dedication, potential residents must weigh these volatility signals against the otherwise strong program.
That tension between strong observable pros and heavy caveats means the decision hinges on practical thresholds. For families prioritizing a refined environment, abundant social life, and dining that feels special, the pros can offset some concerns, provided management quality can be stabilized and accessibility verified. Prospective residents should demand a clear plan for ongoing maintenance, a responsive point of contact, and written confirmation of accessible accommodations before signing. In addition, direct conversations with current residents about daily responsiveness and issue resolution will illuminate whether the present operations meet family expectations. The upside is tangible if communication gaps are bridged and accessibility is verified; the downside is nontrivial if those elements remain uncertain.
Ultimately, Avalon Edmonds presents a compelling option for those who want luxury senior living with a strong sense of community and a high standard of living, delivered in a modern, aesthetically pleasing setting. The notable dining program, engaging activities, and caring staff are not abstract advantages, they translate into real-day benefits for residents who embrace social engagement and independence. Yet the weight of management communication concerns and the serious ADA allegations cannot be ignored. For families where those factors are deal-breakers, exploring comparable communities with proven responsiveness and verified accessibility would be prudent. For others, a disciplined tour with targeted questions can determine whether Avalonâs strengths will comfortably outweigh the risks.














Understanding the Nuances of Palliative Care and Hospice: A Comprehensive Exploration
Fecal Incontinence in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Guide
Recognizing the Journey: Understanding and Navigating Anticipatory Grief