Legacy of St Catherine's in Findlay, OH

Pros

• The community is a great place to live.
• It serves residents who are 55 and older or handicapped.
• Rent is based on income, which benefits residents.

Cons

• The community constantly floods.
• Nothing is done to address the flooding.
• The elder community is left homeless while the on-site manager stays comfortable in her apartment.
• Band-aid fixes are applied to flood damage, or repairs are left unfinished, while tenants have no choice but to leave their homes.
• Maintenance excuses are poor, and many residents have no family nearby to fall back on.

Review

Legacy of St Catherine's in Findlay is best suited for seniors aged 55 and older or residents who are handicapped and need income-based rent. The community's core appeal is the affordability tied to income, which can make independent living possible for budget-conscious residents. Those who value a straightforward, age-targeted living environment may find the arrangement predictable and easy to manage month-to-month, with rent that adjusts to income rather than escalating with market rents. In short, it serves as a practical, low-cost entry point into senior housing for the right qualifiers.

But this option is not for everyone. Families and individuals who require consistently reliable maintenance, rapid response to repairs, and robust, proactive management should consider alternatives. The most troubling feedback centers on flood damage that remains unaddressed, leaving residents displaced and disillusioned. A perception runs through the critiques that the on-site leadership prioritizes personal convenience over essential repairs, with band-aid fixes replacing durable solutions. For households with limited support nearby, these failures become even more consequential and difficult to absorb.

Among the clear positives, the age-and-disability restrictions paired with income-based rent create a focused, somewhat predictable community. Residents who fit the eligibility criteria can expect a living environment where costs are stabilized and where neighbors share similar routines and concerns. This can reduce financial anxiety and foster a sense of belonging among residents who value a calm, straightforward housing arrangement tailored to limited incomes. In that sense, the platform is solid for its intended demographic.

Yet the main cons loom large. Persistent flooding, with reports of unfinished repairs and insufficient mitigation, threatens basic safety and daily comfort. The expressed sentiment that maintenance issues are routinely deferred or superficially addressed is a red flag for anyone prioritizing reliable infrastructure and accountable leadership. When the housing environment is compromised by environmental hazards and slow or evasive management responses, the overall living quality can deteriorate quickly, negating the affordability advantage.

The key question for decision-makers is whether the affordability and targeted peer environment outweigh the risk of ongoing maintenance failures and flood-related disruptions. For residents who can tolerate intermittent service gaps, have strong family support, or can relocate quickly if conditions worsen, the place can still function as a workable option. For those who cannot count on steady repairs or predictable flood protection, alternatives with stronger disaster planning, transparent maintenance records, and resident advocacy are worth pursuing. Prospective residents should insist on concrete evidence of flood mitigation improvements, a clear maintenance escalation protocol, and current resident feedback before committing.

In the end, the community fits a niche audience: those drawn to predictable, income-based pricing and a 55+/handicapped living environment who can live with the caveat of potential infrastructure concerns. For families prioritizing safety, prompt repairs, and environmental risk management, alternatives are advisable. Before making a move, request detailed maintenance logs, proof of completed flood-related work, and candid conversations with current residents about responsiveness and stability. The right choice hinges on whether affordability and peer fit can tolerate a history and pattern of unresolved infrastructure challenges.

Restaurants

• Fricker's (0.7 miles)
• Tony's Restaurant (0.9 miles)
• Waffle House (1.2 miles)
• Chipotle Mexican Grill (1.2 miles)
• Bob Evans (1.2 miles)
• Denny's (1.2 miles)
• Cracker Barrel (1.3 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walmart Pharmacy (1 miles)
• Rite Aid (2 miles)
• Rite Aid (2.2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.4 miles)
• Kroger Pharmacy (2.6 miles)
• Scarbrough Pharmacy (2.7 miles)
• Bundes Research Chemicals Shop (3.5 miles)

Physicians

• Plastic Surgery & Aesthetics of Northwest Ohio (1.1 miles)
• ENT & Allergy Specialists of Northwest Ohio (1.1 miles)
• John D. Seng O.D. (1.9 miles)
• Eyes on Main - Findlay (2 miles)
• Cascades Women's Health (2.5 miles)
• Cascades Urology Center (2.5 miles)
• Century Health (2.5 miles)

Places of Worship

• Gateway Church (1.3 miles)
• Saint Michael the Archangel (1.5 miles)
• Connections Church (1.7 miles)
• College First Church of God, Winebrenner Service (1.9 miles)
• Tabernacle Church of Christ (2.5 miles)
• Howard United Methodist Church (3.1 miles)
• St John's Evangelical Luth Church ELCA (3.7 miles)

Parks

• Emory Adams Park (1.4 miles)
• Swale Park (1.6 miles)
• Mound Park (2.1 miles)
• Riverside Park (2.9 miles)
• Firestine Park (3 miles)
• Findlay Recreation Department (3.1 miles)

Theaters

• AMC CLASSIC Findlay 12 (1.6 miles)

Transportation

• U-Haul Neighborhood Dealer (1.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Blanchard Valley Hospital (2 miles)
• Tele-Care (2.8 miles)

Cafes

• We Serve. Coffee (2.1 miles)
• Fern Cafe (2.4 miles)
• Fort Findlay Coffee & Doughnut Shoppe (2.9 miles)