174 Cliff Mitchell Rd - N Bldg, Picayune, MS 39466
To contact a resident: (601) 749-5555
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Serenity Manor of Picayune Costs & Pricing
Serenity Manor of Picayune offers competitive pricing for its accommodations compared to the broader market in Pearl River County and throughout Mississippi. For a semi-private room, residents can expect to pay $1,750 per month, which is notably lower than the county average of $1,875 and significantly more affordable than the statewide average of $3,189. Likewise, for a one-bedroom option, Serenity Manor's rate stands at $1,950, again undercutting both Pearl River County's average of $2,467 and Mississippi's overall average of $3,416. This makes Serenity Manor an appealing choice for those seeking quality care along with financial value in their living arrangements.
| Floor plans | Serenity Manor of Picayune | Pearl River County | Mississippi |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $1,750 | $1,875 | $3,189 |
| 1 Bedroom | $1,950 | $2,467 | $3,416 |
Independent Living communities with a similar price nearby
-
About the same
Whispering Pines of Picayune
$1,750 to $1,950 / month0.1 miles away
Overall Review of Serenity Manor of Picayune
Pros
The owner truly cares about the residents.- Residents are happy to live here.
- Everything is taken care of.
- The staff and owners demonstrate a hands-on approach and genuine care for the residents.
Cons
David Myers is described as a scam artist who, with Janie/Jaine Johnson, skipped town in Conroe, leaving residents wondering what happened.- Janie/Jaine Johnson is depicted as clueless and unfit to run a senior facility, with her best being pouting like a three-year-old.
- One reviewer warns that once people discover them, they will threaten you with the law.
- The neglect at the facility is described as ridiculous, and the owner is confused about whether it is an assisted living or an independent retirement center.
- The facility may be cheap, but it is not worth the anguish that families or friends will go through there.
- The owners are described as from Picayune and moved back from Texas, with neglect going on there.
Review
This community is best suited for families seeking an intimate, hands-on environment where the owners and direct caregivers are visible and engaged with residents on a daily basis. The most compelling signal here is the reported level of personal involvement: owners who are described as “hands-on” and genuinely invested in residents’ well-being, with anecdotes that life feels cared for and predictable because staff know the individuals in their care. For families prioritizing a close-knit setting over a clinical, large-scale operation, Serenity Manor can feel like a home where staff regularly respond to needs and concerns.
That said, several types of families may want to consider alternatives. Those requiring highly structured, consistently delivered care with formal oversight, robust regulatory transparency, and predictable staffing ratios may find the experience here uneven. Families who cannot tolerate rumors or documented concerns about governance, leadership stability, or potential mismanagement should proceed with extreme caution. If the decision hinges on long-term security, clear licensing status, and a clean track record, a facility with more standardized processes and external accountability may be a safer fit.
The strongest positives, personal attention, owner involvement, and residents feeling that “everything is taken care of”, do create meaningful value in daily life. They can offset some anxiety about routine care and companionship, especially for residents who thrive on direct contact with leadership and a smaller, more home-like setting. However, these strengths do not fully counterbalance the more troubling signals raised in the reviews: reports of neglect, questions about the owner’s leadership capabilities, and serious concerns about long-term stability and governance. In practical terms, the care feel may be real for some residents, but the reliability and safety net families expect from a senior-living community require more consistent corroboration.
The negative feedback dial spikes around questions of management integrity and consistency. Multiple reviewers describe experiences that touch on improvised leadership, unclear distinctions between assisted living and other senior settings, and episodes that imply neglect or miscommunication. One line of commentary ties the facility to a broader pattern alleged to involve scam behavior by individuals previously connected to other properties. While these are third-party accounts, they create a risk signal that families cannot ignore: potential turnover in decision-making that disrupts care plans, staffing, and accountability. The confluence of alleged misdirection, licensing ambiguity, and cross-state ownership activity should prompt families to demand transparent disclosures and recent regulatory findings before making a commitment.
For a family evaluating this choice, a practical due-diligence path is essential. Visit multiple times at different hours; meet direct care staff and the person who holds operational responsibility; request up-to-date licensing information and any state survey results; verify who actually runs the facility now and who signs contracts and billing statements. Ask for written care plans, medication management protocols, and a clear escalation path for concerns. Speak with current residents and families at length to gauge consistency between promises and everyday experiences. Finally, compare with nearby peers that offer a similar level of care but with stronger external oversight and documented accountability.
In the end, Serenity Manor of Picayune stands out for residents who prize immediate, personal attention and a small-community feel, accepting the risk that governance and consistency may not be as robust as they would wish. Families with tighter thresholds for oversight, clear regulatory histories, and long-term stability should consider alternatives that demonstrate a steadier track record and transparent leadership. If pursuing this option, enter with concrete, written commitments about ownership, accountability, and a plan to verify ongoing quality, then monitor closely, with regular, candid check-ins and a clear exit strategy if that accountability falters.
Independent Living
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Medication management
Meals provided
Exploring Nonmedical Home Care: Understanding Services, Costs, and Financial Approaches
Engaging Brain Games and Innovative Apps to Keep Senior Minds Active
Effective Strategies for Keeping Seniors' Minds Active: A Deep Dive into Brain Games and Apps