Marble Street Apartments

Pros

• The high rise is really nice.
• The location is very quiet.
• The street is quiet with no problems or issues.
• A resident has lived there for 20 years.

Cons

• The facility is cockroach ridden and not much seems to be being done about it.
• The facility preys upon the souls who need to live there.
• It deserves to be rated zero stars.
• The apartments across the street are really nasty.

Review

Residents describe a facility where conditions vary wildly from one block to the next, and where deep concerns about pest problems and care coexist with pockets of comfort and quiet. The loudest takeaway is not a single praise or a simple complaint, but a tangled portrait of a place that some tenants want to see improved immediately while others still find solace in quieter corners and in buildings that feel a step above in certain respects. The voices capture a sense that more attention and accountability are needed to protect people who cannot always look after themselves, even as other parts of the area appear more inviting.

One reviewer paints a stark and urgent picture: a facility that is "cockroach ridden" and where "not much seems to be being done about it." The language is blunt and distressing, underscoring a conviction that residents are being neglected. The same voice emphasizes vulnerability - people who "need to live there" and whose well-being should come first. The appeal is not only for better pest control but for a stronger commitment to those residents who may be most susceptible to neglect. The reviewer even goes so far as to say the place "deserves to be rated zero stars," a pointed expression of anger and disappointment that management is not meeting basic standards of safety, cleanliness, and care. Taken together, these statements convey a sense of ongoing struggle with conditions that feel unaddressed and a system that fails to prioritize vulnerable tenants.

In contrast to this bleak portrayal, another reviewer shifts the lens to the neighboring environment, drawing a line between two realities that share the same street but feel very different in practice. The high-rise is described as "really nice," suggesting decent upkeep, modern conveniences, or at least an appearance of quality that makes it feel preferable to the adjacent properties. Yet across the street, the review raises a sharp critique: "the apartments across the street ? It's really nasty." The mention of "Marble Street Apartments" (as guessed from the phrasing) points to a specific comparative judgment - one block of housing that feels acceptable or even appealing to some, while the opposite block lands as dirty, neglected, or otherwise undesirable. The contrast is jarring, implying not only differing physical conditions but also the uneven experiences of those who live in close proximity to each other. It's a reminder that neighborhood character can shift dramatically from one building to the next, shaping residents' daily reality in very concrete ways.

A third voice adds a gentler, more placid note to the mix. This reviewer emphasizes quiet and stability, describing the location as "very quit" (quiet) and noting that it sits on a "very quiet street" with "no problems no issues." The statement that they have been living there for 20 years adds weight - an older, long-term familiarity with the area that carries a kind of trust in the place, even if others have harsher experiences. The sentiment here is less about systemic failings and more about the serenity and reliability of daily life in a particular part of the neighborhood. It presents a counterbalance to the harsher critiques and invites readers to acknowledge that the same area can feel safe and peaceful to some while still falling short for others.

Taken together, the reviews sketch a complex mosaic of impressions: a facility that some see as unsanitary and exploitative, a high-rise nearby that offers comfort, a set of adjacent apartments that elicit strong dissatisfaction, and a section of the street that feels quiet and familiar to a long-standing resident. The juxtaposition raises questions about consistency in maintenance, management accountability, and the distribution of resources across buildings that share a street address. The most pressing thread is the sense that vulnerable residents deserve better protection and more proactive care, especially in environments where pests, cleanliness, and safety concerns can directly affect health and dignity.

What could improve this picture is a clear commitment to addressing pest control and basic maintenance across all buildings on the same block, paired with transparent, responsive communication from property managers. The strongest critique - about neglect toward residents who may struggle to advocate for themselves - speaks to a need for stronger advocacy, oversight, and reform. The optimistic note from the quiet-street resident hints at what is possible when conditions surrounding a location are well managed: consistency, a sense of safety, and an environment where long-term tenants feel valued and heard. The overall message is not merely about different opinions on a few features; it is a call for meaningful action to ensure that every resident, regardless of circumstance, can live with dignity and security.

In the end, the narrative reflects a neighborhood with pockets of quality and pockets of neglect, where experiences can diverge drastically within a few steps. The call remains clear: address the cockroach infestation and other maintenance gaps, protect those who cannot always advocate for themselves, and strive for a level of consistency that makes even the quieter streets feel safe and welcoming for all who call them home. The hope is that a more attentive, comprehensive approach can turn the negative experiences into a shared standard of care, so that the entire block - both the high-rise and its neighboring apartments - can earn trust and a more favorable reputation.

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.1 miles)
• Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen (0.3 miles)
• Wendy's (1 miles)
• Nancy Chang (1 miles)
• Coney Island Lunch (1.4 miles)
• 110 Grill (1.8 miles)
• The Boynton (1.9 miles)

Places of Worship

• St Andrew the Apostle Mission (0.3 miles)
• St Spyridon Cathedral Special Events Committee (1.4 miles)

Transportation

• Webster Square Station (0.4 miles)

Physicians

• Family Health Center of Worcester (0.7 miles)
• Fallon May Street (0.9 miles)
• Courtland Yard Pediatrics (1 miles)
• Eyes on Worcester (1.1 miles)
• Chandler Pediatrics (1.2 miles)
• Haelen medical Dr Zamansky (1.2 miles)
• Crompton Park Professional Building (1.3 miles)

Parks

• Beaver Brook Park (0.9 miles)
• Hadwen Park (1.1 miles)
• Elm Park (1.6 miles)
• Green Hill Park (3.2 miles)
• Lake Park (3.8 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (1.1 miles)
• Orachrom (1.2 miles)
• Walgreens (2 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (2.5 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.1 miles)
• AbbVie Bioresearch Center (3.5 miles)

Cafes

• NU Cafe (1 miles)
• Fuel America (1.8 miles)
• Starbucks (2.2 miles)
• Fuel America (2.4 miles)
• Bean Counter (2.6 miles)
• In House Coffee (2.6 miles)
• Redemption Rock Brewing (2.9 miles)

Hospitals

• St Vincent Hospital (2 miles)
• Saint Vincent Hospital (2 miles)
• Nahtm (2.5 miles)
• UMass Interventional Radiology (2.5 miles)
• Worcester Recovery Center And Hospital (3.7 miles)
• UMass ACC (3.8 miles)
• U Mass Hospital (4.1 miles)