3590 S Pennsylvania St, Englewood, CO 80110
To contact a resident: (303) 789-9578
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Terraces on Pennsylvania
Pros
The other residents are good people.
She had made some good friends.
The location is unbeatable, close to everything, with a hospital just one block away.
The apartments are clean and well-maintained, with no pests reported.
The management is caring and attentive to residents.
Cons
The reviewer states that the deposit and the balance of rent have not been refunded since February and that management has ghosted them.
They note ongoing issues with the apartment and that responses from management are unsatisfactory.
The property manager is described as shutting down the large elevator when not on site and leaving a smaller, frequently breaking elevator to operate, which leaves elderly residents stuck.
The property manager allegedly lets herself into all apartments at will, which disturbed residents.
The front door is frequently broken and propped open, making the building less secure, with repairs not prioritized.
The reviewer would not recommend having family stay there due to neglect of elderly residents.
The waiting-list handling is criticized as unprofessional, with the manager only returning calls when contacted through Burgwyn Residential Management Services and failing to follow up.
Review
Terraces on Pennsylvania in Englewood is best suited for seniors who prize a central, walkable location and a warm, neighborly atmosphere, and who can tolerate variability in day-to-day operations. The site offers proximity to hospitals, shops, and services, with apartments that readers describe as clean and well maintained when management is engaged. It can feel like a suitable home for residents who want to stay connected to the community and who are comfortable advocating for their own needs to keep things moving. In short, it works well for residents who can navigate occasional administrative gaps and who rely on a proactive on-site manager to translate good intentions into consistent service.
Those who should consider alternatives are families with a heightened need for reliability and predictability. If security and controlled access are paramount, this community may present more risk than others: reports of doors frequently propped open, elevators being shut down when the manager is off-site, and privacy concerns about staff entering units with keys. For residents who require steady, timely repairs, consistent communication, and clear financial handling, such as dependable deposit refunds and transparent billing, Terraces on Pennsylvania can feel unsettled. In short, the combination of an aging building, management volatility, and mixed experiences with responsiveness makes alternatives more attractive for risk-averse families or those with residents who have higher care or safety needs.
The potential benefits, location, cleanliness, and social warmth, do carry meaningful weight and can offset some drawbacks when the management team is engaged. A favorable on-site manager can elevate the living experience by addressing care-related concerns promptly, maintaining common areas, and supporting neighborly interaction. The absence of pests or recurring infestations, plus generally well-kept interiors, helps reduce daily stress and supports a stable routine. The proximity to essential medical facilities, public transit options, and shopping can streamline the logistics of aging in place, making this option practical for as long as administrative routines stay consistent and responsive.
However, the most serious red flags are not cosmetic. Several residents report that when leadership changes or is absent, life at the Terraces can feel unstable. Security concerns, doors left propped open, elevators offline intermittently, and a sense that maintenance and repairs do not receive timely attention, directly affect daily safety for seniors who rely on mobility aids. Privacy is another concern, with accounts of staff entering apartments without clear, approved procedures. Add in inconsistent communication around deposits, refunds, and waiting lists, and the risk profile shifts from merely inconvenient to potentially costly and emotionally draining for families trying to close a fair settlement after a loved one moves on.
From a decision-making perspective, families should verify several points before committing. Ask for the current on-site management structure, a plain-language policy on entry to resident units, and a concrete plan for elevator and entry system reliability. Request recent maintenance response times and a written schedule for routine repairs, plus a clear, documented policy on deposits, refunds, and any closing balances. Speak with current residents about how repairs are prioritized, how privacy is respected, and how often management follows up on concerns. If the answers point to proactive accountability and transparent processes, Terraces on Pennsylvania becomes a compelling fit; if not, room should be found elsewhere.
The bottom line is that Terraces on Pennsylvania represents a mixed proposition. For families valuing a strong location, clean apartments, supportive neighbors, and a manager who is consistently attentive, the positives can outweigh the negatives, provided management remains engaged and reliable. For those prioritizing security, predictable maintenance, and unambiguous financial handling, alternatives should be on the short list of comparisons. In short order, a candid tour paired with targeted questions will reveal whether this community can deliver the steady, reassuring environment that long-term senior living requires, or if a more consistently reliable option is the prudent choice.







Financing Long-Term Nursing Home Care Through Social Security: A Thorough Exploration
Essential Knowledge on Pneumonia in Older Adults
Exploring Palliative Care in the Home: A Comprehensive Overview