Mountain View Mobile Park

Pros

• The neighbors are good with each other.
• The park is safe and quiet, and the manager is good.
• The new management is slowly cleaning up the park.
• The park offers very reasonable prices for vacationers.
• The park has a pool and looks nicer with new roads.
• The pool area and spa are clean and the place is well maintained.
• The managers are effective at keeping things under control and maintaining cleanliness.
• Some residents have had a great experience living there since 2013.
• The grounds were kept up and the pool area was the gem of the park.

Cons

• The park is dilapidated and neglected beyond belief.
• The grounds are not well maintained and the pool and spa are dirty most of the time.
• The entrance is treacherous because it sits at the base of a high-speed road.
• There is no pool, no spa, and no park bathrooms or showers.
• The new management is worse than the old management.
• The park is described as run-down, ghetto, and not maintained.
• There is no on-site manager, and residents rarely get a callback.
• The dumpster area needs an upgrade and is in bad shape.
• The place used to be lovely but has gotten worse and is no longer the same.

Review

This collection of impressions paints a complex, often contradictory picture of a trailer park that some remember with nostalgia and others denounce with frustration. On one hand, a few residents praise affordability, quiet surroundings, dog-friendly spaces, and neighbors who look out for one another. On the other hand, a chorus of reviewers describe a property that is run-down, poorly maintained, and sometimes unsafe, with management that can feel distant, capricious, or even hostile at times. The result is a place that evokes different experiences depending on when you visit, who manages it, and what you're hoping to get out of it.

Several accounts emphasize the physical and logistical downsides. The park is described as dilapidated and in need of attention: potholes in the roads, degraded common areas, and a general sense that upkeep has been neglected for years. In the harsher reviews, amenities that might be expected in a community setting - such as a pool, spa, park bathrooms, or even on-site laundry facilities - are either unavailable or not well maintained. One reviewer notes that the entrance sits at the base of a high-speed road, making ingress and egress treacherous, while another laments flooding when it rains and the absence of reliable restrooms or showers. A few who visit or drive through mention that the pool area appears torn up, and that basic conveniences like laundry have been restricted or removed, contributing to a sense that the park is not well-equipped to handle everyday living.

Management and governance emerge as a central point of contention. Opinions split along lines of personality and effectiveness. Some reviewers recount a period of "new management" that is in the slow process of cleaning things up and keeping things under control, with some residents feeling that the on-site managers do a decent job at maintaining order and preventing disorder. Others portray a much darker picture: a park overseen by a manager who is "insane," "psycho," or merely ineffective and unresponsive. There are mentions of no on-site manager, little to no return calls, and a perception that current leadership fails to treat residents with respect. The tension between different eras of management is palpable in the text, suggesting a transition that has left residents uncertain about what to expect from week to week, month to month.

The social fabric of the park is another recurring theme. A few reviews convey warmth and community: neighbors are described as good, and the park is labeled safe and quiet in certain contexts. One writer calls it a "diamond in the rough" with the potential to truly shine if someone invested a bit of money and elbow grease. There are mentions of dog-friendly policies and the sense that, when managed well, the space can be a reasonable home for families and seniors alike, especially given "basic and cheap" pricing and the appeal of living off the beaten path. Nostalgia also threads through several comments, with former owners recalling the grounds as well-kept, the pool as a gem, and the overall feel of the place during a more vibrant era. A long-ago owner even shares memories of nearby landmarks and experiences that echo how the park used to be part of a livelier, more memorable landscape.

Yet the negative experiences cannot be dismissed. Several reviewers insist the property is not fit for guests or residents who expect a standard of cleanliness and maintenance. Phrases like "scary scary ugly," "not maintained," and "the place is ghetto" recur, underscoring a sense of neglect that runs through the grounds, buildings, and amenities. There are explicit complaints about the management's approach to residents, accusations of careless practices, and worries about safety, particularly when the park is described as being run down or when the manager's behavior is characterized as unstable. The tension between past pride and present decline is a running thread, with some former residents noting a sharp decline since they lived there, and others acknowledging that current conditions can vary dramatically from one visit to the next.

Pricing and practical options also show up in the discourse. A few reviewers frame the park as a reasonable choice for vacationers or budget-conscious renters, highlighting a price point (around ten dollars a day in one account) that might be attractive for short stays or temporary arrangements. Still, many of the same voices quickly remind readers that cost is overshadowed by the broader concerns: the quality of the accommodations, the state of the infrastructure, and the reliability of the management. The park's identity seems to hinge on a trade-off between affordability and the quality of the living environment, a trade-off that shifts depending on management and maintenance cycles.

In the end, the place comes across as a property in flux, steeped in memory for some and in disappointment for others. For those who value low cost and a quiet, off-the-beaten-path setting, there is still appeal - especially when a park makes even modest improvements, maintains a reasonable guard against unruliness, and presents a clean, hospitable exterior. For others, the risks associated with aging infrastructure, inconsistent service, and safety concerns outweigh the savings or the potential for a simple, affordable home. The current narrative is not uniform; it ebbs and flows with the people who run it, the residents who live there, and the occasional investment that can lift the grounds from neglected to respectable.

Cafes

• Starbucks (1.5 miles)
• Starbucks (7.1 miles)
• 4 Paws Coffee Co. (7.3 miles)
• Cartel Coffee Lab (7.7 miles)
• Ernest Coffee (8.1 miles)
• Cafe La Jefa (8.3 miles)
• Palm Springs Koffi (8.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.5 miles)
• Hot Springs Pharmacy (1.7 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.8 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (6.4 miles)
• Albertsons Pharmacy (7 miles)
• Walgreens (7.1 miles)
• Walgreens (7.2 miles)

Restaurants

• Taco Bell (1.8 miles)
• Casa Blanca Restaurant (2.2 miles)
• Jack In The Box (4.7 miles)
• Escena Grill at Escena Golf Club (7 miles)
• Loco Charlie's Mexican Grill (7.1 miles)
• McDonald's (7.1 miles)
• Boozehounds (7.4 miles)

Physicians

• Family Care Urgent Care Medical Clinic (1.9 miles)
• Borrego Health - Desert Hot Springs Community Health Center (2 miles)
• Mission Lakes Market Place (3.9 miles)
• Colonic Center (6.7 miles)
• Dr. William J. Grimm, DO (7.7 miles)
• Capily Institute (7.9 miles)
• Premier Surgical Associates (7.9 miles)

Hospitals

• Desert Regional Medical Center (7.9 miles)
• DOHC Infusion Clinic (8 miles)
• Eisenhower Labtechniques Palm Springs (8.6 miles)

Parks

• Ruth Hardy Park (8 miles)
• Palm Springs Dog Park (8.4 miles)
• Demuth Park (9.2 miles)

Transportation

• Palm Springs International Airport (PSP) (8.2 miles)

Theaters

• Regal Palm Springs (8.8 miles)

Places of Worship

• Bloom In The Desert Ministries (9 miles)