116 North Little Horn, Moorcroft, WY 82721
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Sharon's Home Health
Pros
They have always taken great care of our family.- They helped us do things nobody else was willing to do.
Cons
They are not reliable.- They do not keep promised appointments.
- They often change times and dates at the last minute.
- One star is overrated.
- They are the worst company ever.
- The office staff are the worst the reviewer has dealt with.
Review
Sharon's Home Health in Moorcroft, WY is best suited for families that need in-home, hands-on supportive care and can tolerate some scheduling idiosyncrasies. When a caregiver’s presence and personal attention matter more than perfect calendar precision, this agency can provide a meaningful level of assistance. The staff may be willing to tackle tasks others won’t touch, and that willingness translates into genuine, compassionate care for clients who require daily help with activities of daily living and basic companionship. For families where the human element of care is the priority, Sharon’s can be a valuable resource, so long as reliability is not treated as the sole metric of value.
However, the reviews flag a critical caveat: consistency in scheduling and professional administrative communication are uneven. A pattern of late or last-minute changes to appointments and missed promises can erase the benefits of attentive caregiving. The negative feedback about the office staff underscores a signaling issue: even excellent one-on-one care can be undermined by a lack of structure, accountability, and dependable communication. In short, dependability around visits should not be assumed; it must be actively managed and monitored.
The most compelling pro, the caregiver’s willingness to do more, strongly offsets some difficulties when a client’s needs are modest, flexible, and highly personal. For families that value hands-on assistance and emotional support, this level of dedication can be transformative, especially when other options fall short on empathy or practical help. Yet this strength does not fully offset the main cons if scheduling becomes the routine rather than the exception. When visits are routinely delayed or canceled, risk to safety, medication reminders, and daily routines increases, and the appeal of dedicated caregivers diminishes without reliable structure.
To make a practical decision, potential clients should push for concrete reliability measures up front. Request a fixed caregiver schedule with assigned coverage, insist on written advance notice for any changes, and seek a clear escalation path if a caregiver is unavailable. Ask for a supervisor or administrator to be point person for scheduling and quality checks, and confirm what backup plans exist for days with caregiver shortages. Clarify response times for missed visits and the process for reporting concerns. If these safeguards cannot be documented or guaranteed, alternatives should be explored more seriously.
Alternatives to consider include other local home-health providers with established track records of punctuality and responsive admin teams, or, for clients with higher care needs or a preference for predictable routines, transitioning to an assisted-living arrangement with structured schedules and ongoing oversight. Smaller agencies may offer the same personal touch Sharon’s provides, but without reliable booking, the advantage collapses. For a family weighing long-term stability, the question isn’t only about care quality; it is about whether care can be delivered consistently, on time, and with clear administrator accountability.
Ultimately, Sharon's Home Health offers meaningful, compassionate care delivered by people who clearly invest themselves in their clients. The decisive factor is reliability: when visits can be counted on, the combination of devoted caregivers and practical, in-home support makes a strong case for this provider. When reliability cannot be guaranteed, however, families should pursue alternatives that deliver steadier scheduling, stronger administrative communication, and a more predictable care plan. The choice hinges on whether reliability can be secured through proactive oversight and clear expectations, or whether a different option better aligns with the client’s need for dependable, everyday consistency.
21 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults