5449 County Road K, New Franken, WI 54229
To contact a resident: (920) 866-2903
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Anna's House Costs & Pricing
At Anna's House, the monthly cost for a one-bedroom accommodation is set at $4,000. This figure stands in contrast to the average pricing in Brown County, where similar housing options are available for approximately $3,094 per month, and slightly lower at the state level with an average of $3,412. While Anna's House may represent a higher financial commitment compared to both county and statewide averages, it likely offers unique amenities or services that contribute to this premium cost. Potential residents should weigh these benefits against their budgetary considerations when evaluating their housing options.
| Floor plans | Anna's House | Brown County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Bedroom | $4,000 | $3,094 | $3,412 |
Overall Review of Anna's House
Pros
The facility is nice and clean.
The staff are very attentive to residents and make them feel welcomed.
It has a nice layout and doesn’t have that care facility smell.
It’s located in a nice county location near the shrine.
The onboarding admin staff are extremely welcoming and put residents at ease.
The staff are friendly, and residents are happy.
A kind nurse showed compassion for the residents.
Cons
Amanda Vandrisse was extremely rude and uncaring toward the residents.
Amanda Vandrisse showed a complete lack of respect for the elderly and her coworkers.
Amanda Vandrisse began being very disrespectful and mean toward the nurse who showed compassion to actually do her job.
Because Amanda is employed there, the reviewer would not consider Anna’s House.
Review
Anna's House in New Franken is best suited for seniors who want a clean, welcoming, low-traffic setting with attentive staff and a sensible, easy-to-navigate layout. Families who value a facility that feels more like a county home than a sterile institution, and who appreciate a county-location near the shrine, will find this community a natural fit. The environment supports both ongoing care and shorter-term stays, with respite experiences that many families found reassuring and well-managed, especially at onboarding.
Alternatives should be considered by those who cannot tolerate visible tensions among staff or questions about accountability. One review describes a staff interaction that bordered on rude toward residents, naming a specific employee, and notes a compassionate nurse stepping in to restore dignity. When such episodes occur and are not clearly addressed, they raise concerns about the consistency of care and supervisory oversight. For families where dependable, uniformly respectful interactions are non-negotiable, exploring other communities and asking pointed questions during tours is prudent.
On the positive side, several elements stand out. The facility is described as nice and clean, with a layout that avoids the typical “care facility smell,” contributing to dignity and comfort. Staff are repeatedly praised for attentiveness and for making both residents and families feel welcome, especially during onboarding, which helped a resident settle quickly during a two-week respite. Residents are reported as happy, meals are described as great, and the overall atmosphere is warm and engaging, creating a credible daily life that supports ongoing well-being.
That said, the standout con from the reviews is the risk of inconsistent staff behavior. Such a dynamic can undermine the trust built by the strongest positive signals. The presence of a compassionate nurse who intervened demonstrates that a caring culture can persist, but it also highlights the importance of leadership and accountability in sustaining it. If leadership remains vigilant and problem areas are promptly addressed, the best days, cleanliness, warmth, and reliable service, will often outweigh the tougher moments. Prospective buyers should verify how complaints are handled, what accountability measures are in place, and whether there is a clear path to resolution when concerns arise.
Practically, decisions should hinge on direct observations and candid conversations during a visit. Prospective families should watch how staff interact with residents, inquire about supervision levels, turnover, and escalation procedures for concerns. Speaking with current residents or their families about consistency of care, meal quality, and responsiveness will illuminate what daily life is truly like. Request a fuller picture of staffing patterns across shifts, and consider a short-term stay or extended respite to assess fit before committing long-term.
In sum, Anna's House offers a solid option for seniors seeking a clean, welcoming environment with attentive caregiving and a pleasant social atmosphere. Its strongest appeal lies in the lived experience, clear cleanliness, thoughtful layout, empowering onboarding, and authentic warmth from the staff. The main caveat centers on the potential for inconsistent behavior among individual staffers and the need for robust accountability. For families willing to probe questions, observe interactions closely, and demand clear problem-resolution processes, Anna's House can be a dependable home that delivers trustworthy, compassionate care.




















Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Medicare Coverage for Assisted Living: An In-Depth Exploration
Choosing the Right Senior Care: A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living and Nursing Homes



