4615 West Hampton Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53218
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Hampton Supportive Care Costs & Pricing
Hampton Supportive Care offers competitive pricing for its private room accommodations, with monthly costs set at $3,665. This is notably lower than the average rates in Milwaukee County, which stand at approximately $4,513, and also below the state average of $4,339 in Wisconsin. By providing a more affordable option without compromising on quality care and support services, Hampton Supportive Care positions itself as an attractive choice for individuals seeking supportive living arrangements while managing their financial resources effectively.
| Floor plans | Hampton Supportive Care | Milwaukee County | Wisconsin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Private | $3,665 | $4,513 | $4,339 |
Assisted Living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Hampton Supportive Care
Pros
The reviewer loves the residents.
Cons
The facility is absolutely horrible and unprofessional.
It is nasty, bed-bug infested, and dirty, with mice.
The owner hires nothing but family and drug users who mistreat the residents.
The owner only collects money and does not care about the residents.
She has random men who are not certified changing female residents.
The facility does not feed its residents and is filthy.
The management is very poor and the residents are poorly treated.
The manager lets the third shift sleep on the residents and she blames it on the first and second shifts.
The building is falling apart and in bad disrepair.
Review
Hampton Supportive Care is not a general recommendation for most seniors or adults needing assisted living. If a decision must be made under pressure, this community is best understood as a last-resort option for families with extremely limited choices and a willingness to accept substantial safety, cleanliness, and staffing deficiencies. The consensus in the available feedback is stark: the facility struggles to meet basic standards, and that reality should steer decision-makers toward stronger alternatives first.
Alternatives should be strongly considered for anyone who requires dependable supervision, hygienic conditions, predictable meals, and a consistently safe living environment. Residents with cognitive impairment, significant mobility needs, or a high risk of falls should scrutinize other options with regulatory history and clear performance records. Prospective families should prioritize facilities with verifiable licensing compliance, transparent staffing practices, and a track record of maintaining clean, orderly spaces and respecting residentsā dignity.
There are virtually no discernible pros documented in the reviews that meaningfully offset the core concerns. What might be deemed a social element, the sense of community among residents, appears incidental in the face of persistent pest problems, unclean rooms, and unreliable operations. Any impression of affordability or warmth is overwhelmed by the repeated, vivid allegations of infestations, inadequate meals, and a culture of poor oversight. In practical terms, the downsides far outweigh any vague benefits.
The reported issues form a coherent, troubling pattern. Bed bugs and mice infestations, dirty and deteriorating rooms, and a building that shows visible wear all signal ongoing maintenance failures. Staffing concerns are recurrent: third-shift gaps allegedly allow residents to be left unsupervised to the point of harm, while the manager is described as unempathetic and prone to blaming residents rather than solving problems. The ownership dynamic, claims that the owner hires family and relies on unqualified personnel, further erodes confidence in daily operations and resident safety. There are also troubling insinuations about improper staff conduct and a lack of appropriate supervision for intimate care, all of which must be weighed seriously by families seeking trustworthy care.
For families actively evaluating options, a rigorous due-diligence process is essential. Schedule a formal tour and request recent health and safety inspections, as well as any corrective action plans. Ask about pest control records, housekeeping schedules, and how often rooms are cleaned and sanitized. Inquire about staffing ratios by shift, background checks, and ongoing training, particularly for aides who perform intimate care tasks. Request sample menus and a clear timeline for meals, medications, and daily routines, along with a transparent process for reporting and addressing resident concerns. If the answers reveal ongoing deficiencies or evasiveness, the clear, responsible course is to redirect to facilities with verifiable quality records, or to consider in-home care or community-based services as safer, more reliable options.
Ultimately, Hampton Supportive Care earns a conservative recommendation: pursue other communities first, and reserve this one only for the narrowest of circumstances where no acceptable alternatives exist. Families deserve campuses with clean environments, attentive, properly credentialed staff, and a culture that treats residents with consistent dignity and safety. Until those essential criteria are demonstrably met, this option should be viewed as a pause, not a destination, in the search for appropriate assisted living.








Comprehensive Insights into Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and Their Assessment
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs