4141 Savannah Drive, De Forest, WI 53532
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Young House
Pros
The facility is described as five-star with a compassionate, family atmosphere.
Management is fantastic and caregivers treat patients with respect.
Fountainhead Homes has been fantastic for over five years, with staff, management, and owners who care deeply for residents.
The care team provides wonderful and compassionate care, with regular communications.
The homes are small and family-like, with eight residents per house, creating security and belonging.
The staff quickly learns each residentās personality, needs, wants, and routines.
The staff becomes like family through ongoing concern, compassion, and excellent communication.
The care provided feels like home, with staff going above and beyond to meet needs.
Fountainhead Homes is family-owned and family-run, allowing it to adapt to changing needs.
Residents can enjoy activities together and outdoor time, fostering a sense of community.
Cons
The staff are described as horrible, with workers sleeping on the job and managers overworked and understaffed, and some managers allegedly donāt even have degrees.
They feel this is not the place you should take your family.
They contend that residents will not be well taken care of.
They accuse management of lying and say that the whole truth is never disclosed.
Review
Young House in De Forest is best suited for families seeking a truly intimate, home-like assisted living experience. The model centers on small, family-run homes where eight residents share a living environment designed to feel more like a private residence than a campus. This structure makes it easier for staff to know each residentās routines, preferences, and medical nuances, enabling highly personalized care and frequent, direct communication with families. It rewards those who value daily warmth, consistent touchpoints, and a pace that supports meaningful social connections. For seniors dealing with dementia or approaching end-of-life care, the intimate setting often reduces anxiety because caregivers learn personalities quickly, tailor activities, and maintain a predictable, comforting rhythm.
Who may want to consider alternatives is clear: a small home setting hinges on a tight team. When staffing is stretched, as some reviews suggest, the quality of care can suffer quickly, with fatigue and turnover amplifying gaps in supervision and attention. Families prioritizing formal credentialing, rigorous oversight, and highly predictable staffing patterns may prefer larger facilities with documented staff-to-resident ratios and dedicated memory-care units. For those needing extensive medical control, robust daily oversight, or highly structured activity programs managed by seasoned administrators, exploring other options with more pronounced systems and accreditation is prudent.
The strongest pros here are unmistakable: a warm, family-like atmosphere and highly individualized care. Residents are seen as people first, not as a census, with staff who often form genuine, long-term relationships. Regular, substantive communication with families is repeatedly noted, helping relatives feel informed and connected even during absences. The small scale supports tailored activities, in-room personalization, and a sense of belonging, qualities that can significantly lift mood and reduce agitation for residents who thrive on familiar routines and close-knit social circles. The affordability mentioned in several reviews also makes it possible to sustain quality care without sacrificing essential comforts or personalized attention.
Yet the drawbacks cannot be ignored. The most common concerns center on staffing reliability and questions about management. Reports of overworked caregivers, sleep neglect, and under-resourced shifts raise legitimate red flags about consistent care quality, especially during busy periods or medical emergencies. A few families allege dishonesty or a lack of transparency from leadership, which erodes trust at a critical moment when families need clear, honest updates about a loved oneās condition. The tension between a small, flexible model and the need for steady, credentialed oversight creates a real risk that experiences may vary from resident to resident depending on who is on shift.
Balancing the positives and negatives, the decision hinges on what a family values most and how much risk they can tolerate. For residents who will flourish in a warm, intimate environment, where caregivers know names and routines and can pivot quickly to changing needs, the pros can comfortably outweigh the cons, provided due diligence is performed upfront. The intimate setting, strong family engagement, and capacity for rapid, personalized adjustments are meaningful advantages for memory-care and end-of-life scenarios, where consistency of attention is paramount. However, if staffing reliability or transparent governance is non-negotiable, this option warrants cautious exploration and comparison with facilities that offer higher staffing stability and more formalized oversight.
In the final assessment, Young House offers a compelling choice for families prioritizing home-like care, personal engagement, and affordability in a small-scale setting. It is less well-suited for those who demand constant credentialing, strict staffing guarantees, or expansive medical management. Prospective families should engage in thorough due diligence: request current staff-to-resident ratios, review care plans in detail, meet multiple caregivers and administrators, and speak with several families about ongoing experiences. When the fit is right, and the care team proves consistently professional and transparent, this community delivers a comforting, family-centered option that can meaningfully improve day-to-day living for the right resident.






Guiding Your Journey: Understanding Power of Attorney for Elderly Parents
22 Remarkable Caregiver Support Groups Available Online and In-Person
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide