Redmond Heights Senior Living Costs & Pricing
Redmond Heights Senior Living offers competitive pricing in comparison to the broader market within King County and the state of Washington. For instance, their studio apartments are priced at $2,550 per month, which is significantly lower than the county average of $4,464 and the state average of $4,126. Similarly, their one-bedroom units are available for $3,950 a month, compared to $5,127 in King County and $4,632 statewide. This pricing structure not only reflects a commitment to affordability but also underscores Redmond Heights' appeal as an attractive option for seniors seeking quality living arrangements without compromising on value.
| Floor plans | Redmond Heights Senior Living | King County | Washington |
|---|
| Studio | $2,550 | $4,464 | $4,128 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,950 | $5,127 | $4,634 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$450 / mo
Caring Adult Family Home #1
$3,000 / month
6.8 miles away
-
from +$450 / mo
Home Care in Kent Inc.
$3,000 to $3,500 / month
20.1 miles away
-
About the same
Freedom Care
$2,500 to $3,000 / month
16.1 miles away
-
About the same
Silver Pond AFH
$2,500 to $3,500 / month
16.0 miles away
-
from +$450 / mo
Fairwood Gardens AFH
$3,000 to $6,500 / month
16.1 miles away
Overall Review of Redmond Heights Senior Living
common
52 reviews mention this
Staff care is a mixed theme
Residents frequently describe staff as caring and supportive, while a smaller set of reviews report serious breakdowns in responsiveness.
Many reviews praise the people who work there, describing nurses and support staff as kind, attentive, and helpful with daily needs, plus staff who communicate well and follow up. Some also say the current leadership has improved the day-to-day experience. A minority of residents and family members report problems such as long waits for help, staff turnover, and difficulty getting through to the front desk or getting issues addressed. Overall, the tone is positive most often, but the negative accounts are specific about responsiveness and care consistency.
common
14 reviews mention this
Dining quality varies by review
Dining is both a standout and a complaint, with residents split on how good the food is.
Several residents and families praise meals as tasty and plentiful, with menus residents can review and a dining room that feels restaurant-style. Others describe the food as terrible or horrible, saying little money goes into it or meals donāt match what they were expecting. There are also mentions of special diets and accommodating preferences during visits. Residents who had short-term stays for rehab also point to the meals and kitchen staff as part of their recovery experience.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities help residents stay engaged
Residents and families mention regular activities and social options, though some note gaps during COVID periods.
Multiple reviews describe an active routine with scheduled daily activities, outings, games, and entertainers, plus resident-run or community-sponsored events. Some families specifically mention interests like gardening and menās club-style social time. Others say activities were limited when they visited or that residents werenāt as engaged during COVID. Even with those gaps, the overall emphasis in reviews is that thereās more to do than a quiet, institutional routine.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Communication issues can derail plans
Some families report that the office and front desk can be difficult to reach when they need answers.
A few reviews describe situations where calls and messages were not answered for long stretches, including after a procedure when someone expected coordination for aftercare. Other reviewers report office staff lacking communication, such as confusion around billing timing or responsibilities. There are also accounts of delays fixing problems (like cable, water, or an elevator) that increased stress during recovery or limited mobility. On the flip side, other reviews say leadership is communicative and responsive, suggesting the experience can depend on timing and management.
caveat
9 reviews mention this
Repairs, cleanliness, and upkeep draw criticism
Residents describe both ongoing improvements and real frustrations with cleanliness, odors, and maintenance delays.
Some reviews praise cleanliness and a well-kept environment, along with housekeeping that supports residents day to day. Others describe smells, dirty conditions, and problems that took weeks to resolve, such as broken water or cable, elevator downtime, or issues tied to remodeling and building conditions. A few accounts also describe residents being overlooked or not getting timely assistance, which worsens the impact of maintenance problems. At the same time, multiple reviews also mention that the facility is being renovated and leadership has made changes, which may explain why experiences differ from review to review.
differentiator
3 reviews mention this
Catholic services are a clear draw
On-site Catholic services and weekly communion appear to be a reason families choose this community.
Several families highlight faith-based programming, including weekly Catholic communion and mass. One review also points to the importance of chapel access when choosing a community, tying it to ongoing spiritual needs. This theme aligns with the community offering Catholic services as part of its programming, and it shows up in choices made by families rather than just general tour impressions.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.