59 Meadow Street, Rutland, VT 05701
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of Loretto Home
Pros
The nursing staff are engaged, caring, and knowledgeable. - The food is excellent and the laundry and housekeeping staff are very helpful.
- The director is loving and empathetic, with a clear commitment to good care.
- Residents enjoy a variety of activities, including card games and organized outings.
- The facility is clean, bright, and home-like, with private rooms.
- Meals are delicious and varied.
- Transportation to medical appointments is available and a city bus stop is nearby.
Cons
The facility is described as a bad place, with admission becoming hard if a loved one is bruised or disoriented.- There is no easy way to reach staff; there are only answering machines and the staffing is not great.
- The administrator is uncaring and disinterested in residents’ concerns.
- Hand hygiene is not performed between rooms, risking the spread of illness.
- The facility is severely understaffed, with as few as two staff on duty for six floors at night.
- Rooms are tiny and residents are largely confined to their rooms with limited activities.
- The administrative assistant is lazy and rarely available to help.
- The building is old, with peeling paint and stained ceiling tiles.
- Other facilities mentioned by the reviewer were truly awful, smelling of urine and overcrowded.
- There are safety concerns, including residents wandering outdoors and at least one assault occurring.
Review
Loretto Home in Rutland is best suited for families seeking a warm, home-like setting where meals, social activity, and a sense of community are central to daily life. The place tends to work well for residents who value cleanliness, private rooms with accessible shared baths, and a schedule that includes organized outings and transportation to medical appointments. For those who want a quiet, personable atmosphere and are comfortable with an older building, Loretto can feel like a welcoming, small-town home. However, this suitability hinges on consistent staffing and steady administrative engagement, because without reliable oversight the day-to-day experience can swing noticeably.
A clear strength consistently cited is the environment itself: the residence is described as cleaner than many peers, with a homey feel in common spaces and a courtyard that lends residents a sense of place. Meals receive frequent praise for variety and quality, and housekeeping, laundry, and kitchen staff are noted as cheerful and helpful. The presence of private rooms, coupled with a central activities program, crafts, and regular outings, plus practical touches like a snack cart and a coffee area, helps maintain social connection and comfort. Transportation arrangements and even flexible considerations (such as cat companionship) add practical value for families weighing daily life factors.
Yet the positive picture is tempered by significant cautions. Administrative leadership and staff accessibility emerge as recurring fragility points. Several reviewers report difficulty reaching administrators or nursing leadership, and claims of inconsistent or unfriendly responses when questions arise, especially about medications or care plans. Understaffing is another pervasive concern: reported gaps at night and on busy shifts leave residents more reliant on luck than on predictable supervision. Safety incidents, wandering residents and at least one assault, underscore real risks when supervision is inconsistent. The physical plant itself is aging, with notes of peeling paint and small rooms, which can compound challenges for residents who require closer monitoring or more intensive support.
These positives and negatives do not cancel each other out; they interact in meaningful ways. The strongest offset to staffing and leadership concerns lies in the quality of nursing care and the daytime programming when staff are present. When the nursing team is described as engaged, knowledgeable, and compassionate, residents receive attentive medical oversight and personal warmth that can meaningfully enhance quality of life. The robust activity schedule and the facility’s willingness to facilitate outings and social engagement can preserve dignity and purpose, mitigating some daily frustrations that come with aging in place. The new administrator and director of nursing, when present and energetic, have the potential to elevate operations and resident satisfaction, suggesting that outcomes may improve with stable leadership.
Families who should strongly consider alternatives are those for whom safety, predictability, and constant responsive care are non-negotiable. If a loved one requires near-constant supervision, rapid access to licensed staff, or stringent infection-control practices, the reported gaps in hands-on care and the ability to reach leadership quickly become material risks. If the campus’s aging infrastructure and small private rooms present ongoing friction, or if meaningful, consistent engagement from management remains elusive, exploring other communities with stronger 24/7 coverage, newer facilities, or clearer family-facing administration would be prudent. Potential residents with heightened dementia risks or behavioral concerns may also benefit from settings with higher staff-to-resident ratios and broader safety protocols.
Practical steps for families considering Loretto include a diligent in-person visit focused on real-time staffing. Schedule observed interactions with nurses, aides, and the activities team; ask to speak with current residents about daily routines, call lights, and response times. Request detailed information on medication management, incident reporting, and the process for escalating concerns to administration. Inquire about current occupancy, staff turnover, and any recent renovations, plus verify which floors or wings have dedicated memory-care support and higher supervision. Finally, compare with nearby options offering transparent staffing metrics, consistently accessible leadership, and a track record of reliable, safe operations. If these criteria align with priorities, Loretto can deliver a comforting, social, and reasonably well-rounded home, otherwise, alternatives with steadier leadership and stronger daily oversight deserve serious consideration.
57 resident community capacity
1-bedroom apartments
Condos / townhomes
Detached homes
Assisted Living
Air-conditioning
Beautician on-site
Cable or satellite TV
Computer center
Dining room
Financial aid
Fitness room
Fully furnished
Gaming room
Garden
Hiking trails
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Laundry
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Private bathrooms
Respite or short term stays offered
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wellness center
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Community operated transportation
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Hospice care
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Arts and crafts
Concierge services
Games
Live musical performances
Planned day trips
Religious services
English
Vibrant Senior Living: A Comprehensive Guide for Active Older Adults
When to Transition from Assisted Living to Memory Care: Key Indicators, Steps, and Finding the Right Community
Assisted Living and Memory Care: Understanding Their Core Differences