Cache Valley Assisted Living Costs & Pricing
Cache Valley Assisted Living offers competitive pricing for its residents, with monthly costs reflecting the quality of care and amenities provided. For a studio apartment, the cost is $3,300, which is notably higher than the average price in Cache County at $2,781 but slightly below the state average of $3,206. When considering a one-bedroom option, Cache Valley's rate is $3,500 - again exceeding Cache County's average of $2,943 while remaining close to Utah's overall average of $3,556. These figures suggest that while Cache Valley Assisted Living might come at a premium compared to local averages, it likely delivers distinctive services and a nurturing environment that justify the investment in quality senior living options.
| Floor plans | Cache Valley Assisted Living | Cache County | Utah |
|---|
| Studio | $3,300 | $2,781 | $3,206 |
| 1 Bedroom | $3,500 | $2,943 | $3,556 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from -$550 / mo
Legacy House Of Logan
$2,750 to $4,200 / month
3.1 miles away
-
from -$100 / mo
Beehive Homes of Perry
$3,200 / month
19.0 miles away
-
from -$100 / mo
The Gables Of Brigham City
$3,200 to $3,700 / month
18.8 miles away
Overall Review of Cache Valley Assisted Living
differentiator
5 reviews mention this
Memory care support for dementia
Residents and families describe hands-on support for memory care needs.
Several reviews mention dementia care and the memory ward, with families saying staff helped during difficult moments and worked to address daily needs. One reviewer also praised how the facility explained dementia and provided communication for families. At the same time, a couple of memory-care-focused reviews raise serious concerns about nutrition, dehydration, and supervision, including reports of unattended periods and delayed responses to call buttons. Those mixed accounts suggest memory care experiences can vary and are worth discussing in detail during a visit.
common
12 reviews mention this
Home-like feel and cleanliness
Many reviewers describe a clean, home-like setting.
Multiple residents and visitors describe the building as clean and welcoming, often comparing it to a home rather than an institutional facility. Several reviews specifically highlight cleanliness and a comfortable atmosphere when you walk in. A few negative reviews disagree, describing odor and upkeep problems in the memory care area, which stands out against the broader cleanliness praise. Overall, cleanliness and the āfeels like homeā environment are consistent themes, but itās still smart to verify the specific space your loved one would use.
common
10 reviews mention this
Activities and community outings
Engaging activities and outings show up often in reviews.
Reviews frequently mention scheduled activities, social events, and community gatherings that keep residents engaged. Several people also describe outings around town, scenic drives, and daily activity programming. The communityās activity planning is also reflected in the provided activity and devotional options, along with day trips and resident-run or community-sponsored events. While most comments are positive, one reviewer says a particular resident didnāt always want to participate and that they wished staff would encourage more time outside during activities.
common
8 reviews mention this
Food quality and restaurant-style dining
Dining is described as a strong point, including restaurant-style meals.
Many reviewers praise food and kitchen service, describing meals as delicious or wonderful and noting they see residents being supported at mealtimes. The community also lists restaurant-style dining and room service, and several reviews align with that day-to-day focus on meals. A smaller number of comments are less favorable, including one review saying food could be bland despite accommodating different diets. If food matters to your family, reviews suggest itās worth tasting or asking how meals are adjusted for specific preferences.
common
18 reviews mention this
Caring, responsive staff
Staff kindness and attentiveness are repeatedly mentioned in reviews.
A large share of reviews focus on staff being compassionate, attentive, friendly, and willing to help with day-to-day needs. Several families describe support during transitions, communication when questions come up, and staff treating residents with respect and dignity. Some reviews also mention specific roles, like CNAs and nurse support, in the context of explanations, advocacy, or hospice-related care. The overall pattern is strong, but it isnāt unanimousāthere are also complaints about delays and inconsistent care that point to staffing and supervision concerns.
caveat
4 reviews mention this
Staffing delays and supervision concerns
Some reviews report understaffing, delays, and care gaps.
A few reviews describe understaffing and long wait times for aides after call buttons are pressed, including one account of waiting 1ā2 hours for help. Other negative comments raise concerns about supervision in memory care, with reports of residents being left unattended and delayed responses. There are also allegations involving nutrition and dehydration, along with claims that families felt communication was insufficient before a hospital transfer. Because the positive reviews on staff are common, these complaints are particularly important to probeāask how call response and assistance are handled during peak meal and overnight hours.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.