St Marks Garden

Pros

• St. Marks Garden is amazing and well-kept.
• The staff go the extra mile and genuinely care about the residents.
• Residents form friendships and watch out for one another.
• Repairs and maintenance are prompt and efficient.
• The complex is clean, safe, and functions as independent living.
• Becky's team is professional and helpful, going above and beyond (e.g., storing frozen food during a freezer replacement).
• The property is well maintained with snow removal and tidy lawns and trees.

Cons

• One reviewer alleges that St. Marks Garden defrauds HUD by taking funds under false pretenses and not providing the claimed services.
• The reviewer claims that repaving the parking lot forced elderly residents to park at the bottom of a hill, causing health complications for their mother and an emergency room visit.
• They state that there should be criminal charges brought against the owner and advise others not to move there.

Review

St. Marks Garden emerges from these notes as a community that a number of residents and their families view as a valuable option for independent senior living. Across years of residency and care, the prevailing tone is one of gratitude for the support, safety, and social connections that the facility provides. The threads running through the comments highlight a consistent appreciation for responsive maintenance, accessible information about services for seniors, and an atmosphere that fosters neighborliness and personal autonomy.

One family speaks with deep appreciation for a mother who lived at St. Marks Garden for 15 years. They describe a care philosophy that supports both the resident's well-being and the family's peace of mind. According to this account, the staff were not only attentive to practical needs - repair requests were handled promptly and property upkeep was reliable - but also engaged in helping residents access the information and services that older adults often require. The reviewer emphasizes that the combination of prompt maintenance, organized social activities, and practical support for navigating senior services substantially contributed to the mother's ongoing health and happiness, and the family's sense of relief and gratitude. The endorsement is unequivocal: St. Marks Garden is recommended as a place for senior living.

Another voice with a decade-long connection to the community stresses the independent living model and the ongoing quality of the environment. The reviewer notes that the facility is well-kept, clean, and suitable for residents who wish to preserve independence. When issues arise, such as a light bulb burning out or a clogged sink, the response is swift - often a quick phone call or a visit to the office yields fast attention. A vivid episode is recounted in which a freezer malfunction prompted Becky to personally transfer all frozen goods to the office for storage, and then return the items once the new freezer arrived. Beyond maintenance, the property is described as being kept up with snow removal, tidy lawns, and healthy trees, with the staff consistently going the extra mile and demonstrating genuine care for residents. The social fabric is highlighted as well, with residents forming friendships and looking out for one another, and the reviewer's mother is portrayed as thriving in this environment.

A separate reviewer frames their stance by acknowledging sadness at seeing negative reviews about St. Marks, while asserting a strong belief in the community's ability to preserve independence and foster neighborly support. This perspective emphasizes reliable apartment upkeep, twice-yearly inspections, and timely repairs, arguing that there are not many options like this available and expressing a personal willingness to choose St. Marks again in the future. The tone is protective of the community since it presents a balanced view: acknowledging imperfections while underscoring the overall stability and reliability that residents can rely on.

Further praise comes from another family member who describes the staff as awesome, willing to do anything for tenants, and the environment as very clean and safe. They note that their family member feels comfortable, safe, and extremely happy, and they commend Becky and the entire staff for their professionalism, kindness, and readiness to help when needed. The reviewer recalls the transition to a new living arrangement with gratitude for how the staff, especially Becky, facilitated the move and supported the resident through what could have been a stressful process. The overall sentiment is one of strong recommendation based on observed safety, happiness, and the staff's evident dedication to residents.

Against these largely positive narratives sits a starkly different account: a single reviewer accuses St. Marks Garden of defrauding the government by claiming to provide services to residents that are not actually delivered. The reviewer asserts that the facility has been taking money from HUD under false pretenses and alleges a concrete incident where the parking lot was repaved in a way that forced elderly residents to park at the bottom of a hill, creating health complications that led to an emergency room visit for the reviewer's mother. This message is framed as a warning to others, urging social workers not to refer seniors to the location, and calling for criminal charges against the owner. The gravity of these claims stands in stark contrast to the largely positive experiences described by other residents and families, and the reviewer states an intention to file formal reports with HUD and seek an investigation.

Taken together, the collection of reviews paints a multi-faceted picture of St. Marks Garden. The overwhelmingly positive experiences center on independence, practical and quick maintenance, a tidy and safe living environment, and a community where residents look out for one another. The role of staff - especially individuals like Becky, who appear repeatedly in anecdotes as proactive, caring, and dependable - is a recurring source of praise and reassurance for families navigating the care needs of aging relatives. The sense of community, opportunities for social connection, and the reassurance that residents can maintain a degree of autonomy while receiving helpful support are highlighted as core strengths.

Yet, the set is not without contention. The negative account raises questions about governance, financial practices, and liability, pointing to serious concerns about how services are billed and the impact of facility decisions on residents' health and safety. The accusation is framed as a warning rather than a mere complaint, and it explicitly calls for regulatory scrutiny and accountability. While this account stands apart in its severity and scope, it underscores the importance for prospective residents and their families to consider a range of experiences and to seek thorough information about services, protections, and oversight when evaluating St. Marks Garden.

In the end, these reviews collectively present a landscape of strong endorsements tempered by a single, grave concern. For many families, St. Marks Garden represents a dependable option for independent living in a well-maintained environment, with staff who are responsive, compassionate, and committed to residents' well-being. The positive testimonies emphasize personal dignity, community support, and practical care that aligns with what aging adults and their loved ones often seek in a housing arrangement. At the same time, the alarming allegations remind readers that accountability and due diligence are essential, and they highlight the ongoing need for transparency in how services are delivered and funded in senior living communities.

This part of Kaysville, Utah offers convenient access to essential services such as pharmacies, physicians, and hospitals within a short distance. The area also features a variety of dining options ranging from fast food chains to local Mexican cuisine. Nearby parks provide opportunities for outdoor recreation and enjoyment of nature. For those interested in entertainment, there are several theaters just a few miles away. Additionally, places of worship are easily accessible for spiritual fulfillment. Overall, this neighborhood provides a well-rounded environment with amenities that cater to the needs of seniors looking for a comfortable and convenient living location.

Pharmacies

• Bowman's Market (0.1 miles)
• Walgreens (0.4 miles)
• Smith's Food & Drug (1.2 miles)
• Smith's Layton Distribution (2.8 miles)
• Shopko Layton Pharmacy (3.2 miles)
• Smith's Food & Drug (3.4 miles)
• Walgreens (3.9 miles)

Physicians

• Cassity D Kim DMD MS (0.2 miles)
• Layton Visual Center (2.6 miles)
• Utah Imaging Associates : Billing & Business Office (3.1 miles)
• Austin B Imus DO Mental Health (3.2 miles)
• Farmington Family Medicine (3.2 miles)
• We Speak Speech Therapy (3.2 miles)
• AGB Speech Therapy (3.2 miles)

Restaurants

• McDonald's (0.3 miles)
• Arby's (0.4 miles)
• Wendy's (0.4 miles)
• Dylan's Drive-Inn (0.4 miles)
• Orlando's Mexican Restaurant (0.4 miles)
• Taco Time (0.4 miles)
• Little Caesars Pizza (1.2 miles)

Parks

• Heritage Park (0.4 miles)
• Layton Commons Park (1.9 miles)
• Andy Adams Park (2.3 miles)
• Farmington Pond Park (4.6 miles)
• Greyhawk Park (4.8 miles)

Theaters

• Kaysville Theatre (0.6 miles)
• Tinseltown USA (3.1 miles)
• Cinemark Farmington At Station Park And Xd (4.6 miles)

Hospitals

• HCA Farr West and Mountain Division (1 miles)
• Layton Hospital Emergency Services (1.5 miles)
• Intermountain Layton Hospital (1.5 miles)
• Tanner Clinic (4.4 miles)

Places of Worship

• LDS Church (1.2 miles)
• Country Lane Ward (1.3 miles)
• LDS Church (1.6 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (1.6 miles)
• Mountain Road Church (2.4 miles)
• Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (3.5 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (3.6 miles)
• Starbucks (4.3 miles)