Bel Aire Senior Living Costs & Pricing
Bel Aire Senior Living offers competitive pricing for its studio accommodations, with a monthly cost of $2,795. This rate is notably lower than the average costs in both Utah County, which stands at $3,189, and the broader state average of $3,206. By choosing Bel Aire, residents can enjoy a quality living experience while benefiting from significant savings compared to other options in the area. The financial advantage combined with the inviting environment makes Bel Aire Senior Living an appealing choice for those seeking a vibrant community in Utah.
| Floor plans | Bel Aire Senior Living | Utah County | Utah |
|---|
| Studio | $2,795 | $3,189 | $3,206 |
Memory care communities with a similar price nearby
-
from +$205 / mo
BeeHive Homes of Provo I
$3,000 / month
9.9 miles away
-
from +$400 / mo
Highland Glen
$3,195 to $3,895 / month
3.5 miles away
-
from +$455 / mo
Legacy House Assisted Living of Spanish Fork
$3,250 to $4,295 / month
19.4 miles away
-
from -$295 / mo
Cedarwood at Sandy
$2,500 to $3,750 / month
13.8 miles away
-
from +$405 / mo
Beehive Homes of Provo II
$3,200 / month
9.7 miles away
Overall Review of Bel Aire Senior Living
common
44 reviews mention this
Staff are consistently described as caring
Residents and families often describe the staff as attentive and compassionate.
Across many reviews, families describe the staff as kind, caring, and responsive to residentsâ needs. Several people also mention feeling comfortable communicating with administrators or calling for help when questions come up. A number of reviews describe staff treating residents with respect and patience, including during dementia and hospice transitions.
common
16 reviews mention this
Food gets frequent positive feedback
Dining is a regular bright spot, with residents described as enjoying meals.
Many reviews single out the quality of the food, saying it looks good, tastes good, and is plentiful. Some reviewers also mention meal service conveniences like bringing food to residentsâ rooms when mobility limits them. A few reviews temper this by saying the food wasnât impressive or that residents didnât care for it, but positive food mentions show up repeatedly.
common
17 reviews mention this
Activities and outings keep residents engaged
Residents are described as staying busy with activities and group events.
Reviewers commonly mention scheduled activities such as bingo, games, music, book groups, and cooking classes. Some also describe bus trips and outings, and others mention regular opportunities for residents to get fresh air in outdoor spaces. While a few tours and visits note limited socializing or residents seeming bored, the overall tone around activities is positive.
differentiator
8 reviews mention this
Memory care transitions are a theme
Several families describe a smooth shift into memory care as needs changed.
Multiple reviews describe starting in assisted living and later moving into memory care within the same community, including being able to stay in place rather than relocating. Families also mention close attention to dementia needs and patience from staff members. In hospice-related stories, reviewers describe supportive care while end-of-life needs increased.
common
6 reviews mention this
Pricing is described as reasonable
Families frequently describe the pricing as a good value for the care provided.
Some reviewers say they chose the community because it was competitively priced and offered good value compared with other places they looked at. Others mention that pricing felt reasonable and that the overall cost approach was important for budgeting. Pricing support is also reflected in the way the community is positioned as including care and meals in reviews, alongside the listed studio pricing and deltas.
caveat
8 reviews mention this
Space can feel tight for residents
A recurring concern is that rooms and common areas feel small.
Several reviews describe small bedrooms, small bathrooms, and limited common space. Wheelchair users are specifically mentioned as having more difficulty navigating tight hallways or spaces. Even some more positive reviews acknowledge the facility is older or not as spacious as expected, which may be a trade-off for the communityâs size and layout.
caveat
6 reviews mention this
Care responsiveness and staffing show mixed reviews
Some reviews raise concerns about staffing levels and follow-through.
While many reviews are positive about care, a handful describe staffing shortages and slow response after call-button use. There are also mentions of missed assistance needs in specific situations, including showering and oxygen management during respite stays. Other reviews directly contradict these concerns by describing timely communication and support, so experience appears uneven across residents and time periods.
How we summarize
Counts show how many written reviews mention each theme; a review can touch several themes, and only frequently mentioned themes are displayed.