Oak Haven Inc in Houston, TX

Pros

• The friend prioritizes her daughter's health by addressing the cigarette odor.
• They actively report the issue to management in the hope of a resolution.
• The family stays resilient and continues to seek a safer living environment.
• The community cares about elderly residents by raising safety concerns and seeking improvements.

Cons

• The apartment always smells like cigarettes.
• They are dismissed when reporting the smell, with officials saying they don't smell anything.
• A 7-month-old baby sleeps in the room with the strongest cigarette smell.
• The friend gets headaches from the cigarette smell.
• The elderly mother lived in a roach-infested community for three years.
• Roach infestations are a persistent problem in the community.
• The hot water boiler is set too low on weekends.
• The maintenance person is not a licensed boiler operator.
• The facility treats elderly residents poorly.

Review

Oak Haven Inc in Houston is not a broad-appeal option. It is best suited for a very narrow slice of families who must choose among scarce, lower-cost housing options and are willing to tolerate ongoing comfort and safety trade-offs. In practice, this community serves only those who can endure persistent odor issues and maintenance gaps with little expectation of timely, substantive remediation. For most seniors and families seeking reliable air quality, consistent utilities, and proactive on-site management, Oak Haven represents a high-risk choice rather than a viable baseline.

Anyone who prioritizes clean living conditions and dependable day-to-day operations should look elsewhere. Potential residents and their families with infants, respiratory sensitivities, or mobility- and health-related needs should treat this as a red-flag facility. Alternatives that document transparent track records for pest control, odor management, and licensed, on-site maintenance staff will almost always outperform Oak Haven. Where safety, predictable comfort, and responsive service are nonnegotiable, other communities clearly outpace this one.

In terms of what finite advantages may exist, there is little evidence of meaningful pros in the current reviews. The absence of concrete, verifiable strengths means there is no real offset for the most serious drawbacks described. Without visible advantages - such as reliable utilities, proactive maintenance, or effective pest management - the negatives dominate the decision calculus. This is not a scenario where minor conveniences or unknown price points redeem the overall risk.

The most immediate, repeatedly documented concern is a persistent cigarette odor in one unit that residents rely on visitors to corroborate. The smell has real health implications - headaches and potential respiratory irritation - especially when a child sleeps in the same room. Attempts to address the issue through complaints to the office are described as ineffective or inconsistent, with responses that appear to shift responsibility between units. This pattern signals a troubling lack of accountability and a failure to create a breathable, comfortable living environment.

A second, equally troubling thread is a roach infestation paired with a boiler reliability problem. The hot water boiler is reportedly set to a low temperature on weekends, affecting comfort and safety, while an on-site maintenance person lacks a licensed boiler operator credential. These issues point to systemic maintenance and regulatory concerns that put elderly residents at risk and undermine daily quality of life. The combination of pest exposure and inadequate boiler operation constitutes a serious red flag for families evaluating safety, health protections, and compliance with basic care standards.

Given these realities, the decision to pursue Oak Haven should be made with clear, concrete steps. Families considering this community should demand recent pest-control logs, a documented plan for odor mitigation, and verifiable evidence of licensed technician involvement for any boiler or heating systems. On-site management should provide written timelines for remediation and a commitment to ongoing oversight rather than episodic fixes. When touring facilities, insist on direct conversations with maintenance leadership and questions about weekend coverage, emergency response, and third-party inspections. If these assurances cannot be obtained, or if historical patterns persist, alternatives with demonstrated track records for clean environments, properly licensed maintenance staff, and reliable utilities deserve priority.

Physicians

• Campbell Family Practice (0.2 miles)
• Amir Ghebranious Amir Ghebranious MD (0.2 miles)
• Texas Children's Health Center (2.9 miles)
• Pearland Pediatrics, PA (3.6 miles)
• Yerramadha Muralidhar MD PCP Associates of Pasadena (4.3 miles)
• Nag Clinics (4.5 miles)
• Friendswood Medical Arts Clinic (4.5 miles)

Pharmacies

• Walgreens (1.9 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3 miles)
• Walgreens (3.1 miles)
• Walgreens (3.2 miles)
• Good Neighbor Pharmacy (3.5 miles)
• Walgreens (3.8 miles)

Parks

• Sagemeadow Park (2.2 miles)
• Bay Knoll Park (3.7 miles)
• Crenshaw Park (3.7 miles)
• Bay Pointe Neighborhood Park (3.8 miles)
• Challenger 7 Memorial Park (4.4 miles)

Restaurants

• Chick-Fil-A (3.1 miles)
• Good Vibes (3.2 miles)
• First Watch (3.7 miles)
• Gringos Mexican Cafe (3.7 miles)
• McDonald's (3.8 miles)
• Whataburger (3.9 miles)
• Sonic Drive-In (4 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (3.6 miles)
• Panera Bread (4 miles)
• Starbucks (4.1 miles)
• Starbucks (4.9 miles)
• Black Rock Coffee Bar (5.3 miles)
• Starbucks (5.5 miles)
• Starbucks (5.6 miles)

Places of Worship

• First Presbyterian Church (4.3 miles)
• St Bernadette Catholic Church (4.6 miles)
• Memorial Baptist Church SBC of Pasadena (6.1 miles)

Hospitals

• St. Luke's Health - Patients Medical Center - Pasadena, TX (4.5 miles)
• UTMB Health Clear Lake Campus (5.7 miles)
• Clear Lake Regional Heart Tower (5.9 miles)

Transportation

• Pearland Regional Airport (LVJ) (5.3 miles)