489 Kenya Street, Cedar Hill, TX 75104
To contact a resident: (210) 886-0094
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Passionate Living Costs & Pricing
Passionate Living offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader market in Ellis County and across Texas. For semi-private rooms, Passionate Living is available at $2,000 per month, significantly lower than the county average of $3,343 and the state average of $3,680. Similarly, private rooms at Passionate Living are priced at $3,000 monthly, which remains below both the county's average of $3,222 and Texas' average of $4,096. These favorable rates not only highlight Passionate Living's commitment to affordability but also reflect a dedication to providing quality care without compromising on comfort or accessibility.
| Floor plans | Passionate Living | Ellis County | Texas |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $2,000 | $3,343 | $3,680 |
| Private | $3,000 | $3,222 | $4,096 |
Overall Review of Passionate Living
Cons
The floor plan was laid out poorly.- It was not good for constant supervision.
- Night supervision was questionable.
- A roach was seen on the wall.
Review
Passionate Living in Cedar Hill is best suited for seniors who are largely independent and for families that can supply close, ongoing oversight. The sole firsthand account suggests caution for anyone who requires reliable daily support or predictable overnight safety. For residents who depend on 24/7 staff supervision or who need a consistently pest-free, well-ordered environment, this community does not appear to meet those essential needs. In practical terms, the match is strongest only when a resident can maintain a high degree of self-sufficiency, with family members ready to step in for supervision during the day and, crucially, at night.
The visit highlighted clear red flags that shape the decision. The floor plan was described as poorly laid out, which undermines visibility and supervision across common areas and rooms. That limitation compounds safety concerns for residents who wander, require assistance with mobility, or need quick access to staff when help is needed. Night supervision was labeled questionable, creating a risk for emergencies after-hours. The presence of a roach on the wall signals not just an isolated sanitation issue but potentially deeper maintenance and housekeeping gaps that can erode residents’ comfort and trust in daily care routines.
Given these fundamental shortcomings, many families should seriously weigh alternatives. Communities with understandable, intuitive layouts, transparent and consistent nighttime staffing, and proven pest and sanitation protocols will typically outperform this option for residents who require ongoing assistance or a high level of safety assurance. If the priority is dependable overnight coverage and meticulous upkeep, other Cedar Hill options are likely to deliver more predictable outcomes and greater peace of mind.
On the upside, one could infer a smaller, perhaps more intimate setting might appeal to residents who value a tight-knit, low-traffic atmosphere and who can tolerate imperfect supervision while remaining largely self-directed. However, such potential advantages are not substantiated by the available information, and they do not meaningfully offset the glaring concerns flagged in the visit. Pest sightings, questionable night staffing, and a flawed layout collectively overwhelm any marginal benefits of a cozier footprint or lower operating pace.
Practical next steps are clear for families evaluating Passionate Living. Conduct a disciplined on-site assessment focused on safety and flow: observe at multiple times of day, verify the floor plan in person, and watch how staff respond to a resident needing help. Demand copies of pest control schedules, housekeeping protocols, and recent sanitation audits. Probe the night-shift coverage, how many staff are present after dark, and what contingencies exist for emergencies. Compare these findings against several other Cedar Hill communities that offer clearer layouts, firmer staffing guarantees, and demonstrable pest-control records. If those benchmarks cannot be met, move decisively toward alternatives that place resident safety and reliable supervision at the forefront.
10 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Board and Care Home
Respite Care
Activities off-site
Bath tubs
Cable or satellite TV
Devotional services off-site
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Indoor common areas
Move-in coordination
Outdoor common areas
Private
Private bathrooms
Telephone
Wheelchair accessible showers
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
Dallas Love (19 miles away)
24-hour supervision
Ambulatory care
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Diabetic care
High acuity care
Incontinence care
Meal preparation and service
Medication management
Special dietary restrictions
Transportation arrangement (medical)
Transportation to doctors appointments
Christian services
Some full-time staff show genuine care; good meals and pleasant grounds.
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities