739 S Parker Dr, Florence, SC 29501
To contact a resident: (843) 661-6655
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Carriage House Senior Lvg Costs & Pricing
Carriage House Senior Living offers competitive pricing for its residents, particularly when compared to the broader market in Florence County and the state of South Carolina. The monthly cost for a studio apartment at Carriage House is $1,750, significantly lower than the county average of $3,256 and the statewide average of $3,649. Similarly, their one-bedroom units are priced at $2,400, which again presents a notable savings relative to Florence County's average of $3,123 and South Carolina's average of $3,806. This makes Carriage House an appealing option for seniors seeking quality living arrangements that provide both comfort and value in a supportive community environment.
| Floor plans | Carriage House Senior Lvg | Florence County | South Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Studio | $1,750 | $3,256 | $3,649 |
| 1 Bedroom | $2,400 | $3,123 | $3,806 |
Overall Review of Carriage House Senior Lvg
Cons
The facility smells terrible.
It is claimed that the brother has had no bed linens on his bed all weekend, the room is filthy, and there is pee in the trash can.
The reviewer says they will be reporting these conditions.
A huge bed bug infestation was reported to affect the entire facility.
It is alleged that the administrator knew about the infestation and did nothing.
The facility was still accepting residents without informing them about the bed bug problem.
The staff reportedly walked out.
The review states that the place should be shut down.
Review
Carriage House Senior Living in Florence, SC is best suited for families and residents who prioritize affordability above all else and are prepared to actively supervise care. The reviews paint a clear picture: low cost may come at the expense of basic cleanliness, reliable staffing, and responsive management. For anyone who expects a steady, hygienic environment, predictable routines, and transparent communication from leadership, this community is not a good match. The facility’s current overall rating (2.7) and the surge of serious concerns strongly suggest that cost savings should not be pursued at the expense of essential quality of life and safety.
Those who should consider alternatives are families with loved ones who depend on clean rooms, timely housekeeping, and competent, available staff. If the priority is a safe, well-maintained environment with consistent attention to resident needs, this community raises red flags that merit comparing other options. Prospective residents should pursue facilities with proven housekeeping standards, pest control discipline, and staff stability, along with administrators who respond decisively to problems rather than appearing to overlook them. In short, the bar for acceptable risk is high, and several reviews indicate it is not met here.
The few positive reviews that exist do not counterbalance the dominant negatives. Reported strengths are unclear in detail, and they are far outweighed by pervasive concerns about sanitation and management. The most alarming issues, rooms left without fresh linens over weekends, urine in trash receptacles, and rooms described as filthy, signal a pattern of neglect that undermines daily comfort and dignity. When such issues recur, they undercut any potential benefits like location convenience or basic amenities, leaving families with legitimate doubts about consistency of care.
The management and safety concerns are central. A bed bug infestation reportedly went unaddressed by leadership, with residents potentially exposed to health risks while still being admitted, and staff reportedly walking out in response to conditions. These claims point to a breakdown in accountability and a fragile staffing model, which in turn jeopardizes routine care, timely housekeeping, and prompt response to resident needs. In a setting where health and comfort hinge on clean environments and reliable caregivers, these conditions should trigger immediate corrective action and transparent communication, neither of which seem reliably present in the accounts provided.
Visit planning should focus on concrete, verifiable assurances. Request recent health, sanitation, and pest control records; review housekeeping schedules and incident logs; speak directly with frontline staff about day-to-day routines and turnover; and ask about staffing levels during various shifts. Look for a clear chain of accountability, a documented remediation plan for any past issues, and a commitment to resident comfort that includes timely linen service, clean laundry, and spotless rooms. Check state inspection results and talk to current residents or families to gauge whether problems have been resolved or merely managed.
Bottom line: given the documented concerns about cleanliness, safety, and leadership responsiveness, this community is unlikely to meet the needs of families insisting on reliable care. Alternatives with stable staffing, transparent operations, and verifiable cleanliness standards should be prioritized. If choosing to explore Carriage House, enter with tightly defined expectations and enforceable conditions, short-term contracts, quarterly reviews, and explicit consequences for missed standards. Otherwise, steer toward facilities with proven track records in housekeeping, pest control, and proactive administration to safeguard dignity, health, and peace of mind for residents and their families.









Assisted Living Support for Veterans: A Complete and Detailed Overview
Exploring the Contrasts Between Assisted Living and Skilled Nursing
8 Key Indicators That Suggest It May Be Time to Transition from Assisted Living to Skilled Nursing Care