739 South Parker Drive, Florence, SC 29501
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Carriage House Senior Living Of Florence Costs & Pricing
Carriage House Senior Living of Florence offers competitive pricing for its senior living accommodations when compared to both Florence County and the broader context of South Carolina. For those opting for semi-private rooms, the monthly cost stands at $3,000, which is notably higher than the county average of $2,661 but slightly lower than the state average of $3,243. In terms of private rooms, residents can expect to pay $4,000 per month, which exceeds the county's average rate of $3,933 while remaining below the state average of $4,246. This positioning suggests that Carriage House provides a range of services and amenities that justify its pricing structure in relation to local and state standards.
| Floor plans | Carriage House Senior Living Of Florence | Florence County | South Carolina |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,000 | $2,661 | $3,243 |
| Private | $4,000 | $3,933 | $4,246 |
Overall Review of Carriage House Senior Living Of Florence
Cons
The facility smells terrible.
His brother hasnât had any bed linens on his bed all weekend.
There is pee in the trash can and the room is filthy.
A news article reported a huge bed bug infestation throughout the facility, and the administrator knew about it but did nothing.
The staff walked out, leaving residents without being informed about the bed bug problem.
The facility should be shut down.
Review
This community is best suited for families that can exercise close, ongoing oversight and accept limited assurances around cleanliness and consistent staff response. In practical terms, Carriage House Senior Living Of Florence may work only for residents whose care needs are basic, and whose families are prepared to intervene frequently to monitor hygiene, room upkeep, and daily operations. It is not a good fit for seniors who depend on reliable housekeeping, prompt assistance, and a consistently staffed environment. In short, those seeking a hands-off, hands-free experience should look elsewhere.
For anyone weighing alternatives, this property is unlikely to satisfy families who prioritize sanitary conditions, transparent management, and stable, responsive caregiving. The reviews signal a pattern of significant red flags: persistent odor and dirty conditions, neglected linens, and rooms that feel neglected or improperly maintained. When a facility combines reports of bed linen neglect with complaints about cleanliness in resident rooms, the baseline expectation of daily housekeeping and upkeep is not being met. The presence of these issues, paired with alleged administrative inaction on a widespread bed bug problem and a history of staff departures, points decisively toward seeking other options unless a family has compelling reasons to stay local and budget-conscious.
The debated pros, if any are noted in a few positive reviews, do not meaningfully offset the dominant concerns. The weight of the negative experiences, especially around sanitation and maintenance, and the serious claims about bed bug infestations and leadership response, overwhelms any potential upside. In practical terms, reliability and safety are the core attributes families must measure, and those metrics appear compromised. Positive anecdotes, where they exist, do not demonstrate a track record of consistent cleanliness or dependable staffing, which are essential for confidence in ongoing care.
Families evaluating this community should insist on a rigorous, objective tour with specific, probing questions. Demand a current, comprehensive housekeeping schedule and evidence of routine room turnover, linen changes, and trash removal practices. Inquire about pest control history and containment measures, and request documentation from recent state inspections. Speak directly with current residents and their families to gauge day-to-day responsiveness, including whether staff check on call lights promptly and whether rooms are attended to with regular cleanliness. Request a current administrator or directorâs contact information to assess transparency and accountability over time. A clear, documented plan for addressing any cleanliness or safety concerns is non-negotiable.
If alternatives are on the table, prioritize facilities with established reputations for cleanliness, stable staffing, and proactive management. Seek communities with transparent reporting, higher star ratings, and consistent positive feedback from residents and families. Look for environments that demonstrate strong housekeeping protocols, reliable response times, and robust pest-control practices, backed by accessible records and on-site leadership that remains accountable. For seniors needing more structured medical or memory care, ensure the chosen place can deliver those services without sacrificing hygiene or staffing stability.
Bottom line: Carriage House Florence represents a high-risk choice for families whose loved ones require dependable cleanliness, proactive care, and stable staff. The prevailing experiences shared by most reviewers point to serious deficiencies that undermine daily quality of life and safety. Alternatives should be prioritized for those who can choose, especially for residents with higher care needs or those who cannot afford ongoing oversight to compensate for gaps. If staying within this community becomes unavoidable, pair the decision with a formal, continuous oversight plan, regular visits, documented housekeepings and maintenance checks, and a clear line of administrative accountability, to mitigate the substantial downsides reflected in the reviews.










A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States
Comprehensive Residential Support and Assisted Living Solutions for Individuals with Disabilities
Comprehensive Supportive Living Arrangements for Adults with Disabilities