412 Pee Dee Church Road, Dillon, SC 29536
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of B & B Assisted Living
Pros
The reviewer expresses deep concern for residents’ welfare and safety.- The reviewer plans to report concerns to the Division of Aging and Disabled to protect residents.
- The reviewer prays for the well-being of residents and for decisive action by health authorities.
- The reviewer asserts integrity, stating they do not lie.
- The reviewer urges others to be cautious and seek accountability to prevent harm.
Cons
The facility is described as serving residents expired food, with mold on bread and cakes.- They allegedly stretch one dozen eggs with powdered milk to feed 33 people.
- The owner is accused of washing raw expired chicken in a sink with bleach to kill the smell before cooking and serving it.
- They reportedly take residents’ entire checks and give them only $30 a month.
- The writer prays the board of health shuts down all these facilities to prevent residents from becoming more ill.
- The staff are accused of doping the residents to control them and their finances.
- A relative’s father ended up not recognizing family after being there, having been given enough medicine to kill a horse.
Review
B & B Assisted Living in Dillon, SC is best viewed as an option only for very budget-conscious families willing to accept substantial risk and limited oversight. The community appears most suited to residents who require minimal hands-on assistance and who do not have pressing needs for reliable medical management, consistent supervision, or robust dining and safety standards. In practical terms, this is not a good match for seniors who rely on routine help with medications, daily Personal Care, or ongoing monitoring. The verdict is clear: affordability cannot compensate for the level of safety and quality concerns that emerge in the surrounding feedback.
Families should explicitly consider alternatives if any of the following are priorities: transparent staffing, consistent meal quality and safety, rigorous oversight, and clear financial practices. The reviews signal that risk tolerance needs to be low here, particularly for individuals with cognitive or physical frailty, or for those who rely on caregivers to advocate and intervene regularly. Those who expect well-documented care plans, timely assistance, and dignified daily living should look elsewhere. Prospective residents with loved ones who have complex medical needs or who require strong protection against neglect or exploitation will want to pursue other licensed communities with verifiable safety records.
The limited positives that might be imagined, such as a lower-cost option or a small, local setting, do little to offset the core downsides. The most consequential concerns cited are not cosmetic: reports of food safety lapses, questionable meal preparation practices, and a pattern of controlling or mishandling resident finances. When trust is eroded around basic sustenance and the integrity of care, any nominal affordability loses its appeal. In other words, the potential savings are dwarfed by the risk of deteriorating health, unsafe food, and possible financial exploitation. The balance sheet simply does not tip in favor of the community when weighed against these fundamental risks.
From a practical standpoint, the red flags are specific enough to demand immediate due diligence. Prospective families should demand full, up-to-date health inspections and licensing records, and they should insist on direct conversations with staff about meal sourcing, food safety practices, and how medications and finances are managed and supervised. It is essential to verify whether there have been any enforcement actions, consumer complaints, or corrective plans filed with state authorities. Incident reporting policies, staff training on elder care basics, and mechanisms for resident advocacy should be requested in writing. Before any commitment, visit unannounced, observe dining areas, and speak with current residents and families about daily routines, responsiveness, and perceived safety.
In the end, this community presents a high-stakes choice. The dominant impression from the reviews is that safety and quality concerns substantially eclipse any potential cost savings. Families weighing options in Dillon should treat B & B Assisted Living as a last-resort consideration. If the budget is a hard constraint, allocate time to explore other local facilities with stronger oversight, transparent operations, and verifiable outcomes. For those who cannot or will not compromise on basic safety, the prudent path is clear: redirect to higher-rated options, conduct thorough due diligence, and secure commitments that address medication management, staffing adequacy, meal safety, and financial transparency before any enrollment.
30 resident community capacity
Assisted Living
Beauty salon
Cable or satellite TV
Dining room
Fully furnished
Garden
Housekeeping services
Kitchenette
Move-in coordination
Outdoor space
Restaurant-style dining
Small library
Telephone
Wi-Fi/high-speed internet available
24-hour call system
Activities of daily living assistance
Assistance with bathing
Assistance with dressing
Assistance with transfers
Diabetes diet
Medication management
Mental wellness program
Special dietary restrictions
Understanding Medicaid Coverage for Assisted Living: A Comprehensive Guide
How and When Medicaid May Cover Assisted Living Costs
A Detailed Exploration of Assisted Living Medicaid Waivers Across the United States