Meadow Glen at Skippack

Pros

• Eddie is very efficient and works quickly to get things done.
• Eddie fixed the problem and repaired the running toilet.
• Eddie is definitely a hard worker.
• The place is very clean.

Cons

• The playground is falling apart, moldy, trash-strewn, and has been used for writing inappropriate messages, creating an unsanitary environment for children.
• Repairs are not performed in a timely manner and fixes often fail or break again soon after.
• The running toilet emits a loud ringing sound and barely flushes, requiring constant manual flushing.
• The water heaters provide only a brief warm shower before turning cold, making showers uncomfortable.
• The water lacks a softener, causing eye irritation and a harsh feel to the water.
• Regular inspections and replacements do not occur, even for items that should be updated every six years.
• Blinds are falling apart, air filters are not changed, vents are not cleaned, and removed blinds are not replaced.
• Doors were installed without door handles, creating a significant fire hazard and difficult operation.
• The no-smoking policy is not enforced; marijuana smells and cigarette butts are common.
• Trash collection is infrequent; trash piles up for weeks, causing odors and attracting bees.
• Move-in conditions were dirty, walls and carpets filthy, with pre-existing damage not repaired.
• The reviewer believes a hotel is better than living there.

Review

The reviewer starts by acknowledging a rare positive note in otherwise frustrating conditions: Eddie, a maintenance worker who arrived recently, is praised for his efficiency and quick work. The writer notes that Eddie handled long-standing work orders and not only fixed a persistent problem but also repaired a running toilet, emphasizing that Eddie is a hard worker who gets things done promptly. This compliment sits at the top of a long list of ongoing concerns that paint a picture of a property management experience that awaits real improvement.

Beneath that compliment, the review paints a troubling picture of the on-site environment and its daily hazards. The playground is described as falling apart, with children frequently in proximity to waste and disease risk - poop having been wiped on equipment, mold covering surfaces, and inappropriate messages etched into the equipment. The writer stresses that the area around the playground is unsafe and unsanitary, with the implication that young children are regularly exposed to these conditions. The combination of decay, vandalism, and health hazards forms a recurring theme in the critique of the property.

Maintenance and repair problems are presented as chronic and inadequately resolved. The writer claims that nothing seems to hold up after repairs: a kitchen sink repair broke again on the same day, and the toilets allegedly emit a bothersome ringing noise that lasts for hours, interrupting residents' daily tasks. Water-related issues are described in more severe terms: water heaters allegedly fail quickly, leaving hot showers freezing cold after a couple of minutes, and efforts to soften hard water are described as ineffective or nonexistent. The reviewer contends there is a lack of proper inspections and timely replacements - claims that repairs and upkeep should occur on a regular six-year cycle but apparently do not. Additional interior concerns include blinds that are falling apart, insufficient air filtration and ventilation (air filters not changed, vents not cleaned), and windows left without proper coverings because new blinds were installed or promised but never completed.

Water quality and visibility issues extend into the broader plumbing and indoor-air concerns: the reviewer mentions skin and eye irritation from water, asserting that the water is so harsh or poorly treated that it burns the eyes, and there is a sense of ongoing neglect regarding maintenance of essential systems. The assertion that there is no effective water softening contributes to a broader sense that even basic amenities are not being properly cared for, with consequences for health and comfort. The review also notes a perceived fire hazard stemming from incomplete door hardware work - doors were replaced or altered without the necessary fixtures, leaving residents manual and unsafe to operate doors as needed.

Outdoor and environmental conditions further compound the distress. There is frustration with the apparent mismatch between stated policies and on-the-ground realities: a "no smoking" neighborhood policy is contradicted by pervasive smoke odors and cigarette litter throughout the property. Trash collection is described as irregular and slow, with refuse accumulating for what feels like weeks, creating not only a strong odor but also attracting bees during the warmer months. When the mowing crew does come, the lack of care - grass clippings and debris left around the property - exacerbates asthma concerns for the writer and their family, who have a history of respiratory issues. The overall cleanliness of outdoor spaces is depicted as inconsistent, with debris and pests contributing to a sense of neglect.

The interior layout of the dwelling and its logistical challenges receive substantial critique as well. The writer describes a layout that makes everyday tasks - like bringing groceries into the home - difficult due to stairs blocking doors and awkward entryways that complicate both arrival and movement within the unit. They recount a specific moving-day scenario where two couches could not be moved through the doorway without extraordinary effort. The overall odor and condition upon moving in are described as unacceptable - wall surfaces dirty, carpets filthy, and visible damage left unrepaired. The homeowner argues that the landlord should have addressed these issues before occupancy, including repainting and cleaning, but claims that none of this occurred.

Disturbances and safety concerns within the living environment are described in vivid terms, including frequent yelling, loud music, and confrontations that the writer attributes to ongoing conflicts among residents. The reviewer relays a particularly distressing anecdote about an apparent violent incident - a Black woman reportedly stomping in a man's car window, with broken glass left on the floor and a child who later came into contact with it. The passage is explicit about racialized commentary, noting a belief that such incidents reflect broader neighborhood conditions and quality of life. This portion of the review communicates not just physical hazards but a sense of fear and unease that pervades daily life in the complex.

Lease, paperwork, and housing-policy issues stand out as entrenched administrative failures in the reviewer's account. The writer claims that the management repeatedly refused to add family members to the lease for more than two years and denied placement on a wait-list for a larger unit, despite having four children sharing a single room. There are allegations of mismanagement involving financial documentation, including claims that the management claimed not to have received documents containing their Social Security numbers, which the writer says they had dropped off in a secure location. The reviewer frames these issues as evidence of a broader pattern of miscommunication and neglect, contributing to a sense of instability and insecurity in housing arrangements. The narrative also includes a personal note about long family ties to Apt. 83 and an assertion that the author has since become the Asset Manager for the Housing Authority City of Yuma, lending a sense of personal history and credibility to the perspective, albeit in a way that underscores the depth of frustration with current conditions.

In conclusion, the writer insists that, despite the occasional positive touch from a capable staff member like Eddie, the overall experience of living in this property is unacceptable. The tone suggests that the complex represents a pattern of unresolved maintenance, safety hazards, poor environmental management, and administrative shortcomings that undermine the comfort, health, and safety of residents. The author juxtaposes the negative realities with a final, emphatic sentiment: a hotel, in their view, offers a far better living experience than what they describe here. The review closes with a strong intent to move out and a firm stance that timely repairs, proper upkeep, and transparent, responsible management are urgently needed to restore any sense of stability or dignity for the residents who continue to endure these conditions.

Restaurants

• Bay Pony Inn (1.6 miles)
• Duck Inn Taproom (2 miles)
• McDonald's (3.1 miles)
• McDonald's (4.3 miles)
• Thai Basil Bistro (4.7 miles)
• The Collegeville Italian Bakery (4.7 miles)
• CJ's Doghouse (5 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (1.6 miles)
• Rann Pharmacy (3.3 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (3.4 miles)
• Landis Supermarket (3.7 miles)
• Walgreens (4.3 miles)
• Rite Aid (4.4 miles)
• CVS Pharmacy (4.8 miles)

Physicians

• Lederach Family Medicine (1.7 miles)
• Pennridge Pediatrics (3.1 miles)
• Harleysville Medical Associates (3.3 miles)
• Dr Weber Foot and Ankle Specialist (4 miles)
• Collegeville Eye Physicians & Surgeons (4.1 miles)
• Pma Medical Specialists (6.3 miles)
• Trivalley Primary Care (6.7 miles)

Parks

• Upper Salford Park (2.2 miles)
• Green Lane Park (6.6 miles)
• Upper Schuylkill Valley Park (7.2 miles)
• Stony Creek Sports Park (8 miles)
• School Road Park (8.4 miles)
• Valley Forge National Historical Park (10 miles)

Cafes

• Starbucks (4.4 miles)
• Starbucks (6.3 miles)
• Starbucks (6.3 miles)
• Starbucks (7.9 miles)
• Starbucks (9.5 miles)

Hospitals

• Einstein Collegeville (6.1 miles)
• Physicians Care Surgical Hospital (6.9 miles)
• Jefferson Lansdale Hospital (8.3 miles)
• Phoenixville Hospital (9.6 miles)
• Pottstown Memorial Medical Center (9.7 miles)

Places of Worship

• Royersford Baptist Church (6.6 miles)
• Luthern Home (8.3 miles)
• Hope Community Church (9.1 miles)