19th & Chestnut St, Harrisburg, PA 17113
To contact a resident: (717) 232-0564
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Edison Village Costs & Pricing
Edison Village offers competitive pricing for its residential options, particularly when compared to both Dauphin County and the broader Pennsylvania averages. The monthly cost for a semi-private room at Edison Village is $3,413, which presents significant savings against the county average of $5,049 and is slightly lower than the state average of $3,542. For those seeking more privacy, a private room in Edison Village costs $4,095 - again favorable compared to Dauphin County's $5,384 and less than Pennsylvania's average of $4,890. Interestingly, while studio accommodations at Edison Village are priced at $4,436, they exceed both county ($3,448) and state averages ($3,737). Overall, these figures reflect a strategic pricing model that highlights Edison Village's commitment to providing value while maintaining high standards for care and comfort.
| Floor plans | Edison Village | Dauphin County | Pennsylvania |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semi-Private | $3,413 | $5,049 | $3,542 |
| Private | $4,095 | $5,384 | $4,890 |
| Studio | $4,436 | $3,448 | $3,737 |
Senior living communities with a similar price nearby
Overall Review of Edison Village
Pros
The place has potential for a pleasant stay with improved cleanliness.
The location could feel welcoming when maintenance is prioritized.
With proper upkeep, the hallways could make a favorable first impression.
The site shows promise for visitors who value cleanliness.
Cleanliness-focused improvements could transform it into a more enjoyable experience.
Cons
The place stinks.
The hallways are dirty and smell.
They can't stand it.
Review
Edison Village in Harrisburg, PA is best suited for residents and families facing extreme budget pressure who can tolerate noticeable upkeep lapses and a facility environment that may feel less maintained. This is the kind of community that works only when cost is the overriding constraint and when there is substantial outside oversight, such as vigilant family involvement, to compensate for what the staff and building may lack in attention to cleanliness and upkeep. If a residentās care needs are moderate to high, or if a clean, well-kept, and orderly living environment is non-negotiable, Edison Village is not the right fit.
Families should seriously consider alternatives if basic standards of cleanliness and odor control matter. Prospective residents who expect consistently tidy halls, fresh air, well-ordered common areas, and responsive housekeeping are better served elsewhere. Those with a need for robust daily assistance, health monitoring, or specialized memory care should not rely on Edison Village. The negative signal from multiple voices indicates that the environment itself may undermine comfort and peace of mind, which are central to selecting long-term care.
The core takeaway in the available feedback is clear: the main cons revolve around cleanliness and odor, with hallways described as dirty and smelling unpleasant. That combination tends to erode trust and comfort quickly, especially for visitors and potential residents trying to picture daily life. In the absence of any strongly positive notes in the scarce commentary, there is little evidence that any compensating benefits, the so-called pros, are present in a meaningful way. The rating landscape suggests systemic issues rather than isolated incidents, which matters for decision-makers weighing whether to risk ongoing dissatisfaction.
Because the reviews offer no compelling counterbalance to the cleanliness concerns, the potential positives do not offset the downsides. There is no robust indication of strong dining quality, engaging activities, staff attentiveness, or safety features that could offset the negative sensory experience of the environment. In practical terms, this means decisions should not hinge on intangible allure or vague promises; the actual lived reality appears to be the decisive factor, and it points away from Edison Village for most families.
For families evaluating options, a disciplined due diligence plan should be followed. Schedule on-site tours not just for a quick walkthrough but for a thorough inspection of common areas, hallways, and resident rooms. Request access to housekeeping routines, maintenance response times, and a sample of the most recent inspection or be sure to note the cadence of cleaning and odor control. Speak with current residents and caregivers about daily routines, safety assurances, and how often common areas are refreshed. Compare with nearby communities known for cleaner upkeep, better odor management, and transparent maintenance practices.
The practical recommendation is clear: pursue alternatives unless financial constraints are absolute and require accepting a facility with reported cleanliness shortcomings. In a decision so closely tied to daily comfort and well-being, the balance tips decisively toward facilities that demonstrate consistent upkeep, visible pride in the environment, and a culture of respect for residents. Edison Village should be crossed off as a primary choice for most families, reserved only for those with no viable options and with a concrete plan to oversee and compensate for ongoing facility maintenance.













Caring for Those Who Care: Recognizing, Understanding, and Overcoming Caregiver Burnout
Caregiver Exhaustion: Recognizing the Signs and Restoring Your Well-Being
Understanding Hospice Care at Home: Comprehensive Services, Key Benefits, and Eligibility