111 W Long Ave, Du Bois, PA 15801
To contact a resident: (814) 371-1200
For more information about senior living options: (866) 208-4318
Overall Review of St Michael Terrace
Cons
Brenda in the office is insufferable.- She raised an elderly tenant’s rent by more than $200 beyond what the rent agreement allowed.
- Her excuse was “we need a new roof,” yet no one else’s rent increased beyond their contract.
- After the board intervened, she reduced the rent to the contracted amount but then harassed the tenant.
- The reviewer suspects she was pocketing the difference by issuing two receipts.
- She harassed the tenant and treated her differently, leading to eviction after the knee replacement.
- She presented a different eviction reason to the magistrate than the actual reason.
- She tried to bill the tenant for items from the initial walk-through that she wasn’t present for.
- She charged almost $1,000 to remove a mirror that had been hung before the tenant moved in.
- The carpet was stained beyond belief and should have been replaced before move-in.
- The door was scratched and promised to be painted before move-in on the outside.
- A large box of trash was left, costing maintenance about $150 to haul away.
- After eviction, she banned the tenant with four letters sent to the wrong address, restricting visits.
- She is racist, nosy, lies, pockets money, and runs backgrounds on tenants.
- The review ends with a clear verdict: 10/10 DO NOT RECOMMEND.
Review
St Michael Terrace in Du Bois, PA is best suited for seniors who want a straightforward, affordable living option and who have active family involvement to monitor finances and the daily operation. This community appears to serve residents who are largely independent or require light support, but who are prepared to tolerate a management-heavy environment where disputes and administrative friction can become part of the experience. Families with a strong advocate on the ground will fare better here, because the dynamics suggest oversight and advocacy are essential to a smooth stay.
Those weighing alternatives should note who may want to move on. Individuals seeking transparent, predictable billing and consistently respectful treatment by staff should compare other options. Residents who require a higher level of assisted living services or who rely on stable governance and grievance resolution will want to consider communities with documented, independent oversight and clearer resident-rights protections. For anyone with health or cognitive needs, or for families seeking proactive, nonconfrontational management, this site may not be the optimal match.
From the available feedback, the few positives are difficult to parse against the substantial concerns. A solitary 5-star rating hints at a favorable experience for at least one resident, but the lack of detail makes it hard to anchor a constructive takeaway. The overall mix of ratings signals that the practical realities of daily life, billing, communications, and administration, play a large role in resident satisfaction. In a decision-focused view, the tangible drawbacks tend to overshadow the limited, undocumented advantages.
The principal red flags center on management practices and financial interactions. The most explicit allegations describe rent increases beyond the original contract, contested billing, and a perception of misallocation or inappropriate handling of funds. The narrative also details eviction procedures triggered after a medical event, followed by ongoing harassment and communications that feel retaliatory. Additional concerns touch on privacy, access to common spaces, and the legitimacy of notices and visits. Taken together, these issues paint a picture of a climate where resident rights and due process may not be consistently safeguarded.
Pros offsetting the downsides, when they exist, are difficult to pinpoint given the weight of the reported experiences. For families prioritizing calm, predictable routines and a respectful resident-staff dynamic, the current record suggests the risk of abrupt financial or administrative disputes. In practice, the few potential benefits, basic amenities, proximity, or the comfort of a smaller community, seem unlikely to counterbalance decisions driven by rent instability, perceived mistreatment, and possible discrimination narratives. Candidly, more stable governance and transparent operations would be required to tilt the balance toward a positive recommendation.
In concluding, this community warrants a cautious, skeptical approach. If exploring St Michael Terrace, undertake rigorous due diligence: request complete lease terms and rent calculation worksheets, examine any past complaints and resolutions, and seek independent verification of billing practices. Speak with multiple residents about their day-to-day experiences, and insist on clear, sworn policies regarding visitor access, trespass notices, eviction criteria, and resident rights. For families needing assurance of fairness, transparency, and respectful treatment, stronger alternatives with verifiable governance will likely deliver greater peace of mind.
Assisted Living
Activities on-site
Devotional services off-site
Indoor common areas
Ambulatory care
Diabetic care
Meals provided
Extensive nearby amenities and healthcare resources (pharmacies, physicians, hospitals, restaurants, parks).
Understanding the Distinctions: Assisted Living and Memory Care Explained
Guiding Elderly Parents Who Refuse Assisted Living: 6 Practical Steps
Your Comprehensive Guide to Luxury Assisted Living: Elevated Facilities, Amenities, and Costs