St Michael Terrace

Cons

• Brenda is described as insufferable.
• The reviewer claims Brenda raised an elderly tenant's rent beyond what the contract allowed, using "we need a new roof" as justification.
• The board allegedly intervened and Brenda then reduced the rent back to the contracted amount.
• The reviewer suspects Brenda writes two receipts - one for the official books and one for the tenant, pocketing the difference.
• Brenda allegedly harassed the elderly tenant and treated her differently after eviction.
• The eviction notice is alleged to have one reason, but was presented to the magistrate with a different reason.
• Brenda allegedly tried to charge the tenant for items from the initial walk-through for which she wasn't present.
• The reviewer claims Brenda sought nearly $1,000 to remove a mirror that had been hung before the tenant moved in.
• After the eviction case, Brenda allegedly sent several letters banning the tenant from the premises, restricting her access.
• The reviewer asserts Brenda is racist, claiming no person of color lives there and that visitors require approvals from "high ranking officials."
• The reviewer describes Brenda as nosy, racist, possibly pocketing money, lying, and running backgrounds on residents.
• The overall verdict from the reviewer: 10/10 DO NOT RECOMMEND.

Review

A troubling and lurid account emerges from a resident who paints Brenda, the office manager, as a domineering and insufferable figure whose conduct toward an elderly tenant is described as coercive, deceptive, and retaliatory. The account centers on a rent dispute that allegedly spiraled into a broader pattern of misconduct, manipulation, and intimidation. According to the writer, an elderly woman's rent was raised by more than $200 beyond what was stated in her rent agreement, a figure that supposedly could not increase beyond a certain cap for more than a year. When confronted, Brenda allegedly offered a flimsy explanation, claiming the rise was needed "because we need a new roof." Crucially, the writer notes that no other tenant saw their rent increase beyond their contract, suggesting to them a selective and discriminatory pattern along with a possible personal motive.

The reviewer contends that, in the aftermath of the confrontation, Brenda targeted the elderly tenant with harassment and a chilling shift in how she was treated. The situation allegedly escalated to an eviction shortly after the tenant had undergone knee replacement surgery, a detail the writer highlights to illustrate a perceived lack of compassion and fairness. The eviction was described as being based on one reason, yet presented to the magistrate with a completely different rationale, prompting the author to question the integrity of the proceedings. In addition, the writer claims Brenda tried to charge the tenant for issues arising from a move-in walkthrough - expenses that Brenda herself was not present for, but which she insisted the tenant must cover.

Specific charges and financial demands are laid out in vivid detail. The reviewer claims nearly $1,000 was demanded to remove a mirror that was in place before the tenant moved in, along with other items such as stains from nicotine, a carpet described as stained beyond belief, a scratched door, and what was described as a broken promise to paint the outside of the property before the move-in. The list continues with a box, nearly three feet tall and only half full of trash, which the maintenance crew allegedly had to haul to the garbage room, with a cited cost of about $150 to handle the disposal. The implication drawn by the writer is that these expenses were either unfair, inflated, or pretexts used to extract payment from the tenant.

After the eviction process concluded, the account alleges a retaliatory push to cut the tenant off from the community. The tenant reportedly received four letters - addressed improperly or without a valid address - banning her from the premises. The ban allegedly prevented her from visiting friends, catching buses, or transferring between buses at the site, effectively isolating her. The basis for these letters, according to the writer, was that she refused to pay for the mirror, the carpet, the border (likely a miswording for a specific feature or item), or the exterior painting - charges that the tenant argued were the landlord's responsibility or were not the tenant's fault based on the original move-in conditions. The reviewer frames this sequence as retaliation, a punitive tactic aimed at controlling the tenant's access and mobility.

Racism and surveillance are central motifs in the account, with the author asserting that Brenda is racist. The claim goes beyond isolated incidents and paints a picture of a property where no person of color could live comfortably, as the writer asserts there were no tenants of color who could "pass as white." The alleged protocol becomes more punitive: the writer suggests that entry and social access to residents require formal backing from high-ranking city officials, implying a gatekeeping regime that guarantees certain people can visit while others cannot, with a six-month rule on visitors. The tone underscores a belief that bias dictated who could be a tenant and who could not, endowing Brenda with the authority to require "recommendations from high ranking officials in the city" to prove one's status as an "upstanding citizen."

Beyond accusations of racism, the review paints Brenda as nosy, overbearing, and potentially dishonest, casting doubt on whether her office is a fair, transparent operation. The writer speculates about financial malfeasance - an impression of "pocketing money" - and accuses Brenda of conducting personal background checks on residents she chooses to approve or deny. The overall portrait is of a person who wields disproportionate control over tenants, uses administrative tools to surveil and penalize, and then leverages those powers in what the reviewer characterizes as retaliation rather than legitimate management.

In closing, the reviewer delivers a stark verdict: a strong, emphatic warning to others with a final judgment of 10 out of 10 for not recommending Brenda or her office. The narrative leaves little room for a balanced, procedural explanation, instead presenting a single, vehement perspective rooted in experiences of financial manipulation, harassment, eviction, and discriminatory practices. The account ends as a denunciation of Brenda's conduct, urging others to steer clear of what it calls a classically problematic management style that blends financial overreach, intimidation, and discriminatory behavior with the authority of property management.

This part of Du Bois, Pennsylvania, offers a range of amenities and services that cater to senior living needs. With several places of worship nearby, including Saint Peter's Ucc and Trinity United Methodist Church, residents have easy access to spiritual support. The proximity of various restaurants such as Logans' Quick Lunch and Luigi's Ristorante provides convenient dining options. Additionally, there are multiple healthcare facilities in the area, including Dubois Hospital and Women's Health Center Of Dubois, ensuring access to quality medical care. DuBois City Memorial Park offers a peaceful outdoor space for leisure activities, while transportation options like The Auto Lender and Ryder provide convenient travel opportunities. Overall, this neighborhood provides a well-rounded community with essential services for seniors looking to settle down in Du Bois.

Places of Worship

• Saint Peter's Ucc (0.1 miles)
• Trinity United Methodist Church (0.2 miles)
• St Catherine of Siena (0.3 miles)
• Holy Family (0.6 miles)
• Nativity of the Mother of God Byzantine Catholic Church (0.7 miles)
• Jehovah's Witnesses (0.8 miles)
• Dubois Church of Christ (1 miles)

Restaurants

• Logans' Quick Lunch (0.1 miles)
• Coyote Joe's (0.1 miles)
• Luigi's Ristorante (0.1 miles)
• Senor Al's (0.2 miles)
• Domino's Pizza (0.3 miles)
• Subway (0.4 miles)
• China One (0.4 miles)

Cafes

• Soul Platter Cafe (0.1 miles)
• Gateway Cafe (1.6 miles)

Physicians

• Life's Journey OBGYN, PC (0.2 miles)
• Dubois Nephrology Assc PC (0.2 miles)
• Life's Journey OBGYN Doctor (0.2 miles)
• Clearfield Jefferson Primary Care Associates (0.7 miles)
• Clearfield Jefferson Medical Associates (0.7 miles)
• Women's Care of Western Pennsylvania (0.7 miles)
• George M Fatula (0.7 miles)

Parks

• DuBois City Memorial Park (0.2 miles)
• Renlow Park Authority (6.7 miles)
• Reynlow Park (7.9 miles)

Transportation

• The Auto Lender (0.4 miles)
• Ryder (1.7 miles)
• Animal & Habitat Artistry (5.6 miles)
• DuBois Regional Airport (8 miles)

Pharmacies

• CVS Pharmacy (0.6 miles)
• Walmart Pharmacy (1.5 miles)
• Rite Aid (1.6 miles)
• Guardian Long Term Care Pharmacy (5.3 miles)
• McCabe's Drug Store (6.7 miles)

Hospitals

• Dubois Hospital (0.7 miles)
• Women's Health Center Of Dubois (0.7 miles)
• Wound Center of DRMC (0.7 miles)
• Dubois Regional Medical Center (0.7 miles)
• DRMC Behavioral Health Center (0.7 miles)
• Dubois Regional Cardiology Associates (0.8 miles)
• Drmc-e (0.8 miles)